From: Cristian Prundeanu <cpru@amazon.com>
To: <cpru@amazon.com>
Cc: <abuehaze@amazon.com>, <alisaidi@amazon.com>,
<benh@kernel.crashing.org>, <blakgeof@amazon.com>,
<csabac@amazon.com>, <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
<doebel@amazon.com>, <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
<joseph.salisbury@oracle.com>, <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [tip: sched/core] sched: Disable PLACE_LAG and RUN_TO_PARITY and move them to sysctl
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 04:32:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241128103236.22777-1-cpru@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241125113535.88583-1-cpru@amazon.com>
On 2024-11-26, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Would it be possible to use the perf-tool built there to collect
> the scheduling stats for MySQL benchmark runs on both v6.5 and v6.8 and
> share the output of "perf sched stats diff" and the two perf.data files
> recorded?
I'll add this to the list of my next tests. Thank you for mentioning it!
On 2024-11-26, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> SUT kernel arm64 (mysql-8.4.0)
> (2) 6.12.0-rc4 -12.9%
> (3) 6.12.0-rc4 NO_PLACE_LAG +6.4%
> (4) v6.12-rc4 SCHED_BATCH +10.8%
This is very interesting; our setups are close, yet I have not seen any
feature or policy combination that performs above the 6.5 CFS baseline.
I look forward to seeing your results with the repro when it's ready.
Did you only use NO_PLACE_LAG or was it together with NO_RUN_TO_PARITY?
Was SCHED_BATCH used with the default feature set (all enabled)?
Which distro/version did you use for the SUT?
> Maybe a difference in our test setup can explain the different test results:
>
> I use:
>
> HammerDB Load Generator <-> MySQL SUT
> 192 VCPUs <-> 16 VCPUs
>
> Virtual users: 256
> Warehouse count: 64
> 3 min rampup
> 10 min test run time
> performance data: NOPM (New Operations Per Minute)
>
> So I have 256 'connection' tasks running on the 16 SUT VCPUS.
My setup:
SUT - 16 vCPUs, 32 GB RAM
Loadgen - 64 vCPU, 128 GB RAM (anything large enough to not be a
bottleneck should work)
Virtual users: 4 x vCPUs = 64
Warehouses: 24
Rampup: 5 min
Test runtime: 20 min x 10 times, each on 4 different SUT/Loadgen pairs
Value recorded: geometric_mean(NOPM)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-28 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 5:19 [PATCH 0/2] [tip: sched/core] sched: Disable PLACE_LAG and RUN_TO_PARITY and move them to sysctl Cristian Prundeanu
2024-10-17 5:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] [tip: sched/core] sched: Disable PLACE_LAG and RUN_TO_PARITY Cristian Prundeanu
2024-10-17 5:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] [tip: sched/core] sched: Move PLACE_LAG and RUN_TO_PARITY to sysctl Cristian Prundeanu
2024-10-17 9:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] [tip: sched/core] sched: Disable PLACE_LAG and RUN_TO_PARITY and move them " Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-17 18:19 ` Prundeanu, Cristian
2024-10-18 7:07 ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-10-18 9:54 ` Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem
2024-11-14 20:10 ` Joseph Salisbury
2024-11-19 10:29 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-11-25 11:35 ` Cristian Prundeanu
2024-11-26 3:58 ` K Prateek Nayak
2024-11-26 15:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-11-28 10:32 ` Cristian Prundeanu [this message]
2024-11-29 10:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-19 2:30 Prundeanu, Cristian
2024-10-24 8:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2024-10-25 14:43 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-29 4:57 ` Cristian Prundeanu
2024-10-30 10:21 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2024-11-01 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-04 10:19 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-04 10:34 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-01-19 11:04 [GIT PULL] sched/urgent for v6.13 Borislav Petkov
2025-01-28 23:09 [PATCH 0/2] [tip: sched/core] sched: Disable PLACE_LAG and RUN_TO_PARITY and move them to sysctl Cristian Prundeanu
2025-02-11 3:27 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-02-12 5:41 ` Cristian Prundeanu
2025-02-12 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241128103236.22777-1-cpru@amazon.com \
--to=cpru@amazon.com \
--cc=abuehaze@amazon.com \
--cc=alisaidi@amazon.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=blakgeof@amazon.com \
--cc=csabac@amazon.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=doebel@amazon.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=joseph.salisbury@oracle.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.