[openeuler:OLK-6.6 1474/1474] fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c:102:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xfs_ag_fixup_aside' was not declared. Should it be static?

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 1474/1474] fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c:102:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xfs_ag_fixup_aside' was not declared. Should it be static?

[kernel test robot]

tree:   https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6
head:   df4c334beecb4cf58e4e8d63b491aa5ac0a84f46
commit: 8c6e9756375dff2e96d3b598992b2f0e8b3682ee [1474/1474] xfs: fix xfs shutdown since we reserve more blocks in agfl fixup
config: x86_64-randconfig-121-20241118 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241202/202412020323.jAdcem7b-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241202/202412020323.jAdcem7b-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412020323.jAdcem7b-lkp@intel.com/

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c:102:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xfs_ag_fixup_aside' was not declared. Should it be static?

vim +/xfs_ag_fixup_aside +102 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c

    94	
    95	/*
    96	 * Twice fixup for the same ag may happen within exact one tp, and the consume
    97	 * of agfl after first fixup may trigger second fixup's failure, then xfs will
    98	 * shutdown. To avoid that, we reserve blocks which can satisfy the second
    99	 * fixup.
   100	 */
   101	xfs_extlen_t
 > 102	xfs_ag_fixup_aside(
   103			struct xfs_mount	*mp)
   104	{
   105		xfs_extlen_t ret;
   106	
   107		ret = 2 * mp->m_alloc_maxlevels;
   108		if (xfs_has_rmapbt(mp))
   109			ret += mp->m_rmap_maxlevels;
   110	
   111		return ret;
   112	}
   113	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 1474/1474] fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c:102:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xfs_ag_fixup_aside' was not declared. Should it be static?

[kernel test robot]

tree:   https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6
head:   3813640a1336726a6c72428c2f66c8824486e915
commit: 8c6e9756375dff2e96d3b598992b2f0e8b3682ee [1474/1474] xfs: fix xfs shutdown since we reserve more blocks in agfl fixup
config: x86_64-randconfig-121-20241118 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241119/202411191408.XqYzs7Ck-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241119/202411191408.XqYzs7Ck-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411191408.XqYzs7Ck-lkp@intel.com/

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c:102:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'xfs_ag_fixup_aside' was not declared. Should it be static?

vim +/xfs_ag_fixup_aside +102 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c

    94	
    95	/*
    96	 * Twice fixup for the same ag may happen within exact one tp, and the consume
    97	 * of agfl after first fixup may trigger second fixup's failure, then xfs will
    98	 * shutdown. To avoid that, we reserve blocks which can satisfy the second
    99	 * fixup.
   100	 */
   101	xfs_extlen_t
 > 102	xfs_ag_fixup_aside(
   103			struct xfs_mount	*mp)
   104	{
   105		xfs_extlen_t ret;
   106	
   107		ret = 2 * mp->m_alloc_maxlevels;
   108		if (xfs_has_rmapbt(mp))
   109			ret += mp->m_rmap_maxlevels;
   110	
   111		return ret;
   112	}
   113	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki