From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@marvell.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<hgani@marvell.com>, <sedara@marvell.com>, <vimleshk@marvell.com>,
<thaller@redhat.com>, <wizhao@redhat.com>, <kheib@redhat.com>,
<egallen@redhat.com>, <konguyen@redhat.com>, <horms@kernel.org>,
<einstein.xue@synaxg.com>,
Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@marvell.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 RESEND] octeon_ep: add ndo ops for VFs in PF driver
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 18:33:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241203183318.16f378d1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241202183219.2312114-1-srasheed@marvell.com>
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 10:32:18 -0800 Shinas Rasheed wrote:
> These APIs are needed to support applications that use netlink to get VF
> information from a PF driver.
> + ivi->vf = vf;
> + ether_addr_copy(ivi->mac, oct->vf_info[vf].mac_addr);
> + ivi->spoofchk = true;
> + ivi->linkstate = IFLA_VF_LINK_STATE_ENABLE;
> + ivi->trusted = oct->vf_info[vf].trusted;
> + ivi->max_tx_rate = 10000;
I still feel like this is using the rate limiting API to report fixed
link speed, which is tangential to rate limiting..
Unless the user can set the max_tx_rate why would they want to know
what the limit is at? Ideally reporting rate limit would be done
in a patch set which supports setting it.
> + ivi->min_tx_rate = 0;
No need to set this to 0, AFAIR core initializes to 0.
> /**
> @@ -1560,9 +1601,12 @@ static void octep_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> static int octep_sriov_enable(struct octep_device *oct, int num_vfs)
> {
> struct pci_dev *pdev = oct->pdev;
> - int err;
> + int i, err;
>
> CFG_GET_ACTIVE_VFS(oct->conf) = num_vfs;
> + for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++)
> + oct->vf_info[i].trusted = false;
I don't see it ever getting set to true, why track it if it's always
false?
> err = pci_enable_sriov(pdev, num_vfs);
> if (err) {
> dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable SRIOV err=%d\n", err);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-04 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 18:32 [PATCH net-next v3 RESEND] octeon_ep: add ndo ops for VFs in PF driver Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-04 2:33 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-12-05 15:47 ` [EXTERNAL] " Shinas Rasheed
2024-12-06 0:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241203183318.16f378d1@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=egallen@redhat.com \
--cc=einstein.xue@synaxg.com \
--cc=hgani@marvell.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kheib@redhat.com \
--cc=konguyen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sedara@marvell.com \
--cc=srasheed@marvell.com \
--cc=thaller@redhat.com \
--cc=vburru@marvell.com \
--cc=vimleshk@marvell.com \
--cc=wizhao@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.