* [chao:wip 19/20] fs/f2fs/segment.c:2891:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'reset_curseg_fields'; did you mean 'reset_curseg'?
@ 2024-12-16 18:55 kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-12-16 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chao Yu, Chao Yu; +Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Chao Yu, Chao Yu
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chao/linux.git wip
head: 99c1b937f7efd14347261f99e40036e481c6cbc0
commit: adf3b6b31460b800b74602a535414e50d1e761c5 [19/20] f2fs: fix to avoid panic once fallocation fails for pinfile
config: arm-randconfig-002-20241217 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241217/202412170256.GSAInfkZ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241217/202412170256.GSAInfkZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412170256.GSAInfkZ-lkp@intel.com/
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
fs/f2fs/segment.c: In function 'new_curseg':
>> fs/f2fs/segment.c:2891:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'reset_curseg_fields'; did you mean 'reset_curseg'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
2891 | reset_curseg_fields(curseg);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| reset_curseg
fs/f2fs/segment.c: At top level:
>> fs/f2fs/segment.c:3671:13: warning: conflicting types for 'reset_curseg_fields'; have 'void(struct curseg_info *)'
3671 | static void reset_curseg_fields(struct curseg_info *curseg)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> fs/f2fs/segment.c:3671:13: error: static declaration of 'reset_curseg_fields' follows non-static declaration
fs/f2fs/segment.c:2891:25: note: previous implicit declaration of 'reset_curseg_fields' with type 'void(struct curseg_info *)'
2891 | reset_curseg_fields(curseg);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +2891 fs/f2fs/segment.c
2872
2873 /*
2874 * Allocate a current working segment.
2875 * This function always allocates a free segment in LFS manner.
2876 */
2877 static int new_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type, bool new_sec)
2878 {
2879 struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type);
2880 unsigned int segno = curseg->segno;
2881 bool pinning = type == CURSEG_COLD_DATA_PINNED;
2882 int ret;
2883
2884 if (curseg->inited)
2885 write_sum_page(sbi, curseg->sum_blk, GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, segno));
2886
2887 segno = __get_next_segno(sbi, type);
2888 ret = get_new_segment(sbi, &segno, new_sec, pinning);
2889 if (ret) {
2890 if (ret == -ENOSPC)
> 2891 reset_curseg_fields(curseg);
2892 return ret;
2893 }
2894
2895 curseg->next_segno = segno;
2896 reset_curseg(sbi, type, 1);
2897 curseg->alloc_type = LFS;
2898 if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode == FS_MODE_FRAGMENT_BLK)
2899 curseg->fragment_remained_chunk =
2900 get_random_u32_inclusive(1, sbi->max_fragment_chunk);
2901 return 0;
2902 }
2903
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-12-16 18:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-12-16 18:55 [chao:wip 19/20] fs/f2fs/segment.c:2891:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'reset_curseg_fields'; did you mean 'reset_curseg'? kernel test robot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.