All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, acme@kernel.org,
	eranian@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	santosh.shukla@amd.com, ananth.narayan@amd.com,
	sandipan.das@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] perf/amd/ibs: Remove pointless sample period check
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 14:35:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241218133533.GD2354@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241210093449.1662-3-ravi.bangoria@amd.com>

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:34:41AM +0000, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> Valid perf event sample period value for IBS PMUs (Fetch and Op both)
> is limited to multiple of 0x10. perf_ibs_init() has this check:
> 
>   if (!event->attr.sample_freq && hwc->sample_period & 0x0f)
>           return -EINVAL;
> 
> But it's broken since hwc->sample_period will always be 0 when
> event->attr.sample_freq is 0 (irrespective of event->attr.freq value.)
> 
> One option to fix this is to change the condition:
> 
>   - if (!event->attr.sample_freq && hwc->sample_period & 0x0f)
>   + if (!event->attr.freq && hwc->sample_period & 0x0f)
> 
> However, that will break all userspace tools which have been using IBS
> event with sample_period not multiple of 0x10.
> 
> Another option is to remove the condition altogether and mask lower
> nibble _silently_, same as what current code is inadvertently doing.
> I'm preferring this approach as it keeps the existing behavior.

Urgh... :/

> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c | 9 ++-------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c
> index 4ca8006d2221..bd8919e7c3b1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c
> @@ -307,13 +307,8 @@ static int perf_ibs_init(struct perf_event *event)
>  		if (config & perf_ibs->cnt_mask)
>  			/* raw max_cnt may not be set */
>  			return -EINVAL;
> -		if (!event->attr.sample_freq && hwc->sample_period & 0x0f)
> -			/*
> -			 * lower 4 bits can not be set in ibs max cnt,
> -			 * but allowing it in case we adjust the
> -			 * sample period to set a frequency.
> -			 */
> -			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		/* Silently mask off lower nibble. IBS hw mandates it. */
>  		hwc->sample_period &= ~0x0FULL;
>  		if (!hwc->sample_period)
>  			hwc->sample_period = 0x10;
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-18 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-10  9:34 [PATCH v3 00/10] perf/amd/ibs: Fix sample period computations Ravi Bangoria
2024-12-10  9:34 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] perf/amd/ibs: Remove IBS_{FETCH|OP}_CONFIG_MASK macros Ravi Bangoria
2024-12-10  9:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] perf/amd/ibs: Remove pointless sample period check Ravi Bangoria
2024-12-18 13:35   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2024-12-10  9:34 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] perf/amd/ibs: Fix ->config to sample period calculation for OP PMU Ravi Bangoria
2024-12-10  9:34 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] perf/amd/ibs: Fix perf_ibs_op.cnt_mask for CurCnt Ravi Bangoria
2024-12-10  9:34 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] perf/amd/ibs: Don't allow freq mode event creation through ->config interface Ravi Bangoria
2024-12-10  9:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] perf/amd/ibs: Add PMU specific minimum period Ravi Bangoria
2024-12-10  9:34 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] perf/amd/ibs: Add ->check_period() callback Ravi Bangoria
2024-12-10  9:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] perf/core: Introduce pmu->adjust_period() callback Ravi Bangoria
2024-12-18 13:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-08 11:16     ` Ravi Bangoria
2024-12-10  9:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] perf test: Introduce DEFINE_SUITE_EXCLUSIVE() Ravi Bangoria
2024-12-13 19:55   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-12-10  9:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] perf test amd ibs: Add sample period unit test Ravi Bangoria
2024-12-16  6:42 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] perf/amd/ibs: Fix sample period computations Ravi Bangoria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241218133533.GD2354@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.