All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: imbalance in flowtable binding
Date: Thu,  2 Jan 2025 16:44:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250102154443.2252675-1-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)

All these cases cause imbalance between BIND and UNBIND calls:

- Delete an interface from a flowtable with multiple interfaces

- Add a (device to a) flowtable with --check flag

- Delete a netns containing a flowtable

- In an interactive nft session, create a table with owner flag and
  flowtable inside, then quit.

Fix it by calling FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND when unregistering hooks, then
remove late FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND call when destroying flowtable.

Fixes: ff4bf2f42a40 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add nft_unregister_flowtable_hook()")
Reported-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 0b9f1e8dfe49..c4af283356e7 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -8822,6 +8822,7 @@ static void nft_unregister_flowtable_hook(struct net *net,
 }
 
 static void __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(struct net *net,
+						 struct nft_flowtable *flowtable,
 						 struct list_head *hook_list,
 					         bool release_netdev)
 {
@@ -8829,6 +8830,8 @@ static void __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(struct net *net,
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(hook, next, hook_list, list) {
 		nf_unregister_net_hook(net, &hook->ops);
+		flowtable->data.type->setup(&flowtable->data, hook->ops.dev,
+					    FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND);
 		if (release_netdev) {
 			list_del(&hook->list);
 			kfree_rcu(hook, rcu);
@@ -8837,9 +8840,10 @@ static void __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(struct net *net,
 }
 
 static void nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(struct net *net,
+					       struct nft_flowtable *flowtable,
 					       struct list_head *hook_list)
 {
-	__nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net, hook_list, false);
+	__nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net, flowtable, hook_list, false);
 }
 
 static int nft_register_flowtable_net_hooks(struct net *net,
@@ -9481,8 +9485,6 @@ static void nf_tables_flowtable_destroy(struct nft_flowtable *flowtable)
 
 	flowtable->data.type->free(&flowtable->data);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(hook, next, &flowtable->hook_list, list) {
-		flowtable->data.type->setup(&flowtable->data, hook->ops.dev,
-					    FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND);
 		list_del_rcu(&hook->list);
 		kfree_rcu(hook, rcu);
 	}
@@ -10870,6 +10872,7 @@ static int nf_tables_commit(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb)
 							   &nft_trans_flowtable_hooks(trans),
 							   trans->msg_type);
 				nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net,
+								   nft_trans_flowtable(trans),
 								   &nft_trans_flowtable_hooks(trans));
 			} else {
 				list_del_rcu(&nft_trans_flowtable(trans)->list);
@@ -10878,6 +10881,7 @@ static int nf_tables_commit(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb)
 							   NULL,
 							   trans->msg_type);
 				nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net,
+						nft_trans_flowtable(trans),
 						&nft_trans_flowtable(trans)->hook_list);
 			}
 			break;
@@ -11140,11 +11144,13 @@ static int __nf_tables_abort(struct net *net, enum nfnl_abort_action action)
 		case NFT_MSG_NEWFLOWTABLE:
 			if (nft_trans_flowtable_update(trans)) {
 				nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net,
+						nft_trans_flowtable(trans),
 						&nft_trans_flowtable_hooks(trans));
 			} else {
 				nft_use_dec_restore(&table->use);
 				list_del_rcu(&nft_trans_flowtable(trans)->list);
 				nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net,
+						nft_trans_flowtable(trans),
 						&nft_trans_flowtable(trans)->hook_list);
 			}
 			break;
@@ -11737,7 +11743,8 @@ static void __nft_release_hook(struct net *net, struct nft_table *table)
 	list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list)
 		__nf_tables_unregister_hook(net, table, chain, true);
 	list_for_each_entry(flowtable, &table->flowtables, list)
-		__nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net, &flowtable->hook_list,
+		__nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks(net, flowtable,
+						     &flowtable->hook_list,
 						     true);
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2


             reply	other threads:[~2025-01-02 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-02 15:44 Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2025-01-03 17:37 ` [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: imbalance in flowtable binding Phil Sutter
2025-01-03 17:39   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250102154443.2252675-1-pablo@netfilter.org \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.