All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: "Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Anthony PERARD" <anthony.perard@vates.tech>,
	"Michal Orzel" <michal.orzel@amd.com>,
	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v7 2/7] xen/events: don't allow binding a global virq from any domain
Date: Thu,  9 Jan 2025 11:59:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250109105935.23585-3-jgross@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250109105935.23585-1-jgross@suse.com>

Today Xen will happily allow binding a global virq by a domain which
isn't configured to receive it. This won't result in any bad actions,
but the bind will appear to have succeeded with no event ever being
received by that event channel.

Instead of allowing the bind, error out if the domain isn't set to
handle that virq. Note that this check is inside the write_lock() on
purpose, as a future patch will put a related check into
set_global_virq_handler() with the addition of using the same lock.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
V6:
- new patch
V7:
- move handling domain check inside locked region (Jan Beulich)
- style fix (Jan Beulich)
---
 xen/common/event_channel.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/common/event_channel.c b/xen/common/event_channel.c
index 46281b16ce..cd6f5a1211 100644
--- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
+++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c
@@ -120,6 +120,13 @@ static uint8_t get_xen_consumer(xen_event_channel_notification_t fn)
 /* Get the notification function for a given Xen-bound event channel. */
 #define xen_notification_fn(e) (xen_consumers[(e)->xen_consumer-1])
 
+static struct domain *__read_mostly global_virq_handlers[NR_VIRQS];
+
+static struct domain *get_global_virq_handler(unsigned int virq)
+{
+    return global_virq_handlers[virq] ?: hardware_domain;
+}
+
 static bool virq_is_global(unsigned int virq)
 {
     switch ( virq )
@@ -469,6 +476,7 @@ int evtchn_bind_virq(evtchn_bind_virq_t *bind, evtchn_port_t port)
     struct domain *d = current->domain;
     int            virq = bind->virq, vcpu = bind->vcpu;
     int            rc = 0;
+    bool           is_global;
 
     if ( (virq < 0) || (virq >= ARRAY_SIZE(v->virq_to_evtchn)) )
         return -EINVAL;
@@ -478,8 +486,9 @@ int evtchn_bind_virq(evtchn_bind_virq_t *bind, evtchn_port_t port)
     * speculative execution.
     */
     virq = array_index_nospec(virq, ARRAY_SIZE(v->virq_to_evtchn));
+    is_global = virq_is_global(virq);
 
-    if ( virq_is_global(virq) && (vcpu != 0) )
+    if ( is_global && vcpu != 0 )
         return -EINVAL;
 
     if ( (v = domain_vcpu(d, vcpu)) == NULL )
@@ -487,6 +496,12 @@ int evtchn_bind_virq(evtchn_bind_virq_t *bind, evtchn_port_t port)
 
     write_lock(&d->event_lock);
 
+    if ( is_global && get_global_virq_handler(virq) != d )
+    {
+        rc = -EBUSY;
+        goto out;
+    }
+
     if ( read_atomic(&v->virq_to_evtchn[virq]) )
     {
         rc = -EEXIST;
@@ -965,15 +980,13 @@ void send_guest_pirq(struct domain *d, const struct pirq *pirq)
     }
 }
 
-static struct domain *global_virq_handlers[NR_VIRQS] __read_mostly;
-
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(global_virq_handlers_lock);
 
 void send_global_virq(uint32_t virq)
 {
     ASSERT(virq_is_global(virq));
 
-    send_guest_global_virq(global_virq_handlers[virq] ?: hardware_domain, virq);
+    send_guest_global_virq(get_global_virq_handler(virq), virq);
 }
 
 int set_global_virq_handler(struct domain *d, uint32_t virq)
-- 
2.43.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-09 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-09 10:59 [PATCH v7 0/7] remove libxenctrl usage from xenstored Juergen Gross
2025-01-09 10:59 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] xen/events: fix race with set_global_virq_handler() Juergen Gross
2025-01-09 15:46   ` Jan Beulich
2025-01-09 10:59 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2025-01-09 10:59 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] xen/events: allow setting of global virq handler only for unbound virqs Juergen Gross
2025-01-09 10:59 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] xen: add bitmap to indicate per-domain state changes Juergen Gross
2025-01-09 15:49   ` Jan Beulich
2025-01-09 10:59 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] xen: add new domctl get_changed_domain Juergen Gross
2025-01-09 15:50   ` Jan Beulich
2025-01-09 10:59 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] tools/libs: add a new libxenmanage library Juergen Gross
2025-01-09 10:59 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] tools/xenstored: use new stable interface instead of libxenctrl Juergen Gross
2025-01-16 13:44   ` Anthony PERARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250109105935.23585-3-jgross@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@vates.tech \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=michal.orzel@amd.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.