From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, jdamato@fastly.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: protect napi->irq with netdev_lock()
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:51:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250114035118.110297-10-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250114035118.110297-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Take netdev_lock() in netif_napi_set_irq(). All NAPI "control fields"
are now protected by that lock (most of the other ones are set during
napi add/del). The napi_hash_node is fully protected by the hash
spin lock, but close enough for the kdoc...
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 10 +++++++++-
net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 75c30404657b..03eeeac7dbdf 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ struct napi_struct {
unsigned long gro_flush_timeout;
unsigned long irq_suspend_timeout;
u32 defer_hard_irqs;
+ /* all fields past this point are write-protected by netdev_lock */
/* control-path-only fields follow */
struct list_head dev_list;
struct hlist_node napi_hash_node;
@@ -2705,11 +2706,18 @@ static inline void netdev_assert_locked_or_invisible(struct net_device *dev)
netdev_assert_locked(dev);
}
-static inline void netif_napi_set_irq(struct napi_struct *napi, int irq)
+static inline void netif_napi_set_irq_locked(struct napi_struct *napi, int irq)
{
napi->irq = irq;
}
+static inline void netif_napi_set_irq(struct napi_struct *napi, int irq)
+{
+ netdev_lock(napi->dev);
+ netif_napi_set_irq_locked(napi, irq);
+ netdev_unlock(napi->dev);
+}
+
/* Default NAPI poll() weight
* Device drivers are strongly advised to not use bigger value
*/
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 5872f0797cc3..df2a8b54a9f2 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6956,7 +6956,7 @@ void netif_napi_add_weight_locked(struct net_device *dev,
*/
if (dev->threaded && napi_kthread_create(napi))
dev->threaded = false;
- netif_napi_set_irq(napi, -1);
+ netif_napi_set_irq_locked(napi, -1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_napi_add_weight_locked);
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-14 3:51 [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: use netdev->lock to protect NAPI Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] net: add netdev_lock() / netdev_unlock() helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 12:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 22:45 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: add helpers for lookup and walking netdevs under netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 14:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 22:53 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 23:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] net: make netdev_lock() protect netdev->reg_state Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 22:57 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: add netdev->up protected by netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:09 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] net: protect netdev->napi_list with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:10 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] net: protect NAPI enablement " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:00 ` Francois Romieu
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] net: make netdev netlink ops hold netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] net: protect threaded status of NAPI with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 3:51 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-01-14 13:20 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: protect napi->irq " Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:19 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] net: protect NAPI config fields " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:20 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] netdev-genl: remove rtnl_lock protection from NAPI ops Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:21 ` Joe Damato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250114035118.110297-10-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.