From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, jdamato@fastly.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
leitao@debian.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 08/11] net: protect threaded status of NAPI with netdev_lock()
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:51:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250114035118.110297-9-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250114035118.110297-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Now that NAPI instances can't come and go without holding
netdev->lock we can trivially switch from rtnl_lock() to
netdev_lock() for setting netdev->threaded via sysfs.
Note that since we do not lock netdev_lock around sysfs
calls in the core we don't have to "trylock" like we do
with rtnl_lock.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: leitao@debian.org
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 13 +++++++++++--
net/core/dev.c | 2 ++
net/core/net-sysfs.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index d3108a12e562..75c30404657b 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ struct napi_struct {
int rx_count; /* length of rx_list */
unsigned int napi_id; /* protected by netdev_lock */
struct hrtimer timer;
- struct task_struct *thread;
+ struct task_struct *thread; /* protected by netdev_lock */
unsigned long gro_flush_timeout;
unsigned long irq_suspend_timeout;
u32 defer_hard_irqs;
@@ -2451,10 +2451,12 @@ struct net_device {
* Drivers are free to use it for other protection.
*
* Protects:
- * @napi_list, @net_shaper_hierarchy, @reg_state
+ * @napi_list, @net_shaper_hierarchy, @reg_state, @threaded
* Partially protects (readers hold either @lock or rtnl_lock,
* writers must hold both for registered devices):
* @up
+ * Also protects some fields in struct napi_struct.
+ *
* Ordering: take after rtnl_lock.
*/
struct mutex lock;
@@ -2696,6 +2698,13 @@ static inline void netdev_assert_locked(struct net_device *dev)
lockdep_assert_held(&dev->lock);
}
+static inline void netdev_assert_locked_or_invisible(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ if (dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED ||
+ dev->reg_state == NETREG_UNREGISTERING)
+ netdev_assert_locked(dev);
+}
+
static inline void netif_napi_set_irq(struct napi_struct *napi, int irq)
{
napi->irq = irq;
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 1151baaedf4d..5872f0797cc3 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6784,6 +6784,8 @@ int dev_set_threaded(struct net_device *dev, bool threaded)
struct napi_struct *napi;
int err = 0;
+ netdev_assert_locked_or_invisible(dev);
+
if (dev->threaded == threaded)
return 0;
diff --git a/net/core/net-sysfs.c b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
index 2d9afc6e2161..5602a3c12e9a 100644
--- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c
+++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
@@ -108,6 +108,36 @@ static ssize_t netdev_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
return ret;
}
+/* Same as netdev_store() but takes netdev_lock() instead of rtnl_lock() */
+static ssize_t
+netdev_lock_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf, size_t len,
+ int (*set)(struct net_device *, unsigned long))
+{
+ struct net_device *netdev = to_net_dev(dev);
+ struct net *net = dev_net(netdev);
+ unsigned long new;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+ return -EPERM;
+
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &new);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ netdev_lock(netdev);
+
+ if (dev_isalive(netdev)) {
+ ret = (*set)(netdev, new);
+ if (ret == 0)
+ ret = len;
+ }
+ netdev_unlock(netdev);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
NETDEVICE_SHOW_RO(dev_id, fmt_hex);
NETDEVICE_SHOW_RO(dev_port, fmt_dec);
NETDEVICE_SHOW_RO(addr_assign_type, fmt_dec);
@@ -638,7 +668,7 @@ static ssize_t threaded_store(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t len)
{
- return netdev_store(dev, attr, buf, len, modify_napi_threaded);
+ return netdev_lock_store(dev, attr, buf, len, modify_napi_threaded);
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(threaded);
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-14 3:51 [PATCH net-next 00/11] net: use netdev->lock to protect NAPI Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] net: add netdev_lock() / netdev_unlock() helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 12:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 22:45 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] net: add helpers for lookup and walking netdevs under netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 14:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 22:53 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 23:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] net: make netdev_lock() protect netdev->reg_state Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 22:57 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] net: add netdev->up protected by netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:09 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] net: protect netdev->napi_list with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:10 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] net: protect NAPI enablement " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:00 ` Francois Romieu
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] net: make netdev netlink ops hold netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 3:51 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-01-14 13:19 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] net: protect threaded status of NAPI with netdev_lock() Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: protect napi->irq " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:19 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] net: protect NAPI config fields " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:20 ` Joe Damato
2025-01-14 3:51 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] netdev-genl: remove rtnl_lock protection from NAPI ops Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-14 13:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-14 23:21 ` Joe Damato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250114035118.110297-9-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.