From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, jdamato@fastly.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: add helpers for lookup and walking netdevs under netdev_lock()
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:53:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250115035319.559603-4-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250115035319.559603-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Add helpers for accessing netdevs under netdev_lock().
There's some careful handling needed to find the device and lock it
safely, without it getting unregistered, and without taking rtnl_lock
(the latter being the whole point of the new locking, after all).
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
v2:
- add missing READ_ONCE() when under RCU
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20250114035118.110297-3-kuba@kernel.org
---
net/core/dev.h | 16 +++++++
net/core/dev.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.h b/net/core/dev.h
index d8966847794c..25ae732c0775 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.h
+++ b/net/core/dev.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#ifndef _NET_CORE_DEV_H
#define _NET_CORE_DEV_H
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
@@ -23,8 +24,23 @@ struct sd_flow_limit {
extern int netdev_flow_limit_table_len;
struct napi_struct *netdev_napi_by_id(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id);
+struct napi_struct *
+netdev_napi_by_id_lock(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id);
struct net_device *dev_get_by_napi_id(unsigned int napi_id);
+struct net_device *netdev_get_by_index_lock(struct net *net, int ifindex);
+struct net_device *__netdev_put_lock(struct net_device *dev);
+struct net_device *
+netdev_xa_find_lock(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
+ unsigned long *index);
+
+DEFINE_FREE(netdev_unlock, struct net_device *, if (_T) netdev_unlock(_T));
+
+#define for_each_netdev_lock_scoped(net, var_name, ifindex) \
+ for (struct net_device *var_name __free(netdev_unlock) = NULL; \
+ (var_name = netdev_xa_find_lock(net, var_name, &ifindex)); \
+ ifindex++)
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
int __init dev_proc_init(void);
#else
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 6603c08768f6..c871e2697fb6 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -783,6 +783,49 @@ struct napi_struct *netdev_napi_by_id(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id)
return napi;
}
+/**
+ * netdev_napi_by_id_lock() - find a device by NAPI ID and lock it
+ * @net: the applicable net namespace
+ * @napi_id: ID of a NAPI of a target device
+ *
+ * Find a NAPI instance with @napi_id. Lock its device.
+ * The device must be in %NETREG_REGISTERED state for lookup to succeed.
+ * netdev_unlock() must be called to release it.
+ *
+ * Return: pointer to NAPI, its device with lock held, NULL if not found.
+ */
+struct napi_struct *
+netdev_napi_by_id_lock(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id)
+{
+ struct napi_struct *napi;
+ struct net_device *dev;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ napi = netdev_napi_by_id(net, napi_id);
+ if (!napi || READ_ONCE(napi->dev->reg_state) != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ dev = napi->dev;
+ dev_hold(dev);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ dev = __netdev_put_lock(dev);
+ if (!dev)
+ return NULL;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ napi = netdev_napi_by_id(net, napi_id);
+ if (napi && napi->dev != dev)
+ napi = NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (!napi)
+ netdev_unlock(dev);
+ return napi;
+}
+
/**
* __dev_get_by_name - find a device by its name
* @net: the applicable net namespace
@@ -971,6 +1014,73 @@ struct net_device *dev_get_by_napi_id(unsigned int napi_id)
return napi ? napi->dev : NULL;
}
+/* Release the held reference on the net_device, and if the net_device
+ * is still registered try to lock the instance lock. If device is being
+ * unregistered NULL will be returned (but the reference has been released,
+ * either way!)
+ *
+ * This helper is intended for locking net_device after it has been looked up
+ * using a lockless lookup helper. Lock prevents the instance from going away.
+ */
+struct net_device *__netdev_put_lock(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ netdev_lock(dev);
+ if (dev->reg_state > NETREG_REGISTERED) {
+ netdev_unlock(dev);
+ dev_put(dev);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ dev_put(dev);
+ return dev;
+}
+
+/**
+ * netdev_get_by_index_lock() - find a device by its ifindex
+ * @net: the applicable net namespace
+ * @ifindex: index of device
+ *
+ * Search for an interface by index. If a valid device
+ * with @ifindex is found it will be returned with netdev->lock held.
+ * netdev_unlock() must be called to release it.
+ *
+ * Return: pointer to a device with lock held, NULL if not found.
+ */
+struct net_device *netdev_get_by_index_lock(struct net *net, int ifindex)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev;
+
+ dev = dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
+ if (!dev)
+ return NULL;
+
+ return __netdev_put_lock(dev);
+}
+
+struct net_device *
+netdev_xa_find_lock(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
+ unsigned long *index)
+{
+ if (dev)
+ netdev_unlock(dev);
+
+ do {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ dev = xa_find(&net->dev_by_index, index, ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT);
+ if (!dev) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ dev_hold(dev);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ dev = __netdev_put_lock(dev);
+ if (dev)
+ return dev;
+
+ (*index)++;
+ } while (true);
+}
+
static DEFINE_SEQLOCK(netdev_rename_lock);
void netdev_copy_name(struct net_device *dev, char *name)
--
2.48.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-15 3:53 [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: use netdev->lock to protect NAPI Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: add netdev_lock() / netdev_unlock() helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 8:21 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15 8:36 ` Przemek Kitszel
2025-01-15 9:24 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-01-15 14:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 14:24 ` Przemek Kitszel
2025-01-15 3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: make netdev_lock() protect netdev->reg_state Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 8:30 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15 14:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 3:53 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-01-15 8:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: add helpers for lookup and walking netdevs under netdev_lock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15 3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/11] net: add netdev->up protected by netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 8:45 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15 3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] net: protect netdev->napi_list with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 8:57 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-17 22:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-17 22:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: protect NAPI enablement " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 9:02 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-21 8:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-01-21 8:50 ` David Laight
2025-01-21 15:27 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-01-15 3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: make netdev netlink ops hold netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 9:07 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15 3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: protect threaded status of NAPI with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 9:09 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15 3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: protect napi->irq " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 9:12 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15 3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] net: protect NAPI config fields " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 9:15 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15 3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/11] netdev-genl: remove rtnl_lock protection from NAPI ops Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 9:18 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-16 3:30 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: use netdev->lock to protect NAPI patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250115035319.559603-4-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.