All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, jdamato@fastly.com,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: make netdev netlink ops hold netdev_lock()
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 19:53:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250115035319.559603-8-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250115035319.559603-1-kuba@kernel.org>

In prep for dropping rtnl_lock, start locking netdev->lock in netlink
genl ops. We need to be using netdev->up instead of flags & IFF_UP.

We can remove the RCU lock protection for the NAPI since NAPI list
is protected by netdev->lock already.

Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 net/core/dev.h         |  1 -
 net/core/dev.c         |  3 ++-
 net/core/netdev-genl.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.h b/net/core/dev.h
index ef37e2dd44f4..a5b166bbd169 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.h
+++ b/net/core/dev.h
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ struct sd_flow_limit {
 
 extern int netdev_flow_limit_table_len;
 
-struct napi_struct *netdev_napi_by_id(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id);
 struct napi_struct *
 netdev_napi_by_id_lock(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id);
 struct net_device *dev_get_by_napi_id(unsigned int napi_id);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 9cf93868ac7e..9734c3f5b862 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -767,7 +767,8 @@ static struct napi_struct *napi_by_id(unsigned int napi_id)
 }
 
 /* must be called under rcu_read_lock(), as we dont take a reference */
-struct napi_struct *netdev_napi_by_id(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id)
+static struct napi_struct *
+netdev_napi_by_id(struct net *net, unsigned int napi_id)
 {
 	struct napi_struct *napi;
 
diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
index c59619a2ec23..810a446ab62c 100644
--- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
+++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ netdev_nl_napi_fill_one(struct sk_buff *rsp, struct napi_struct *napi,
 	void *hdr;
 	pid_t pid;
 
-	if (!(napi->dev->flags & IFF_UP))
+	if (!napi->dev->up)
 		return 0;
 
 	hdr = genlmsg_iput(rsp, info);
@@ -230,17 +230,16 @@ int netdev_nl_napi_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	rtnl_lock();
-	rcu_read_lock();
 
-	napi = netdev_napi_by_id(genl_info_net(info), napi_id);
+	napi = netdev_napi_by_id_lock(genl_info_net(info), napi_id);
 	if (napi) {
 		err = netdev_nl_napi_fill_one(rsp, napi, info);
+		netdev_unlock(napi->dev);
 	} else {
 		NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(info->extack, info->attrs[NETDEV_A_NAPI_ID]);
 		err = -ENOENT;
 	}
 
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	rtnl_unlock();
 
 	if (err) {
@@ -266,7 +265,7 @@ netdev_nl_napi_dump_one(struct net_device *netdev, struct sk_buff *rsp,
 	unsigned int prev_id;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (!(netdev->flags & IFF_UP))
+	if (!netdev->up)
 		return err;
 
 	prev_id = UINT_MAX;
@@ -303,13 +302,15 @@ int netdev_nl_napi_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 
 	rtnl_lock();
 	if (ifindex) {
-		netdev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
-		if (netdev)
+		netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(net, ifindex);
+		if (netdev) {
 			err = netdev_nl_napi_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
-		else
+			netdev_unlock(netdev);
+		} else {
 			err = -ENODEV;
+		}
 	} else {
-		for_each_netdev_dump(net, netdev, ctx->ifindex) {
+		for_each_netdev_lock_scoped(net, netdev, ctx->ifindex) {
 			err = netdev_nl_napi_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
 			if (err < 0)
 				break;
@@ -358,17 +359,16 @@ int netdev_nl_napi_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	napi_id = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_NAPI_ID]);
 
 	rtnl_lock();
-	rcu_read_lock();
 
-	napi = netdev_napi_by_id(genl_info_net(info), napi_id);
+	napi = netdev_napi_by_id_lock(genl_info_net(info), napi_id);
 	if (napi) {
 		err = netdev_nl_napi_set_config(napi, info);
+		netdev_unlock(napi->dev);
 	} else {
 		NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(info->extack, info->attrs[NETDEV_A_NAPI_ID]);
 		err = -ENOENT;
 	}
 
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	rtnl_unlock();
 
 	return err;
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ netdev_nl_queue_fill(struct sk_buff *rsp, struct net_device *netdev, u32 q_idx,
 {
 	int err;
 
-	if (!(netdev->flags & IFF_UP))
+	if (!netdev->up)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	err = netdev_nl_queue_validate(netdev, q_idx, q_type);
@@ -474,11 +474,13 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 
 	rtnl_lock();
 
-	netdev = __dev_get_by_index(genl_info_net(info), ifindex);
-	if (netdev)
+	netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(genl_info_net(info), ifindex);
+	if (netdev) {
 		err = netdev_nl_queue_fill(rsp, netdev, q_id, q_type, info);
-	else
+		netdev_unlock(netdev);
+	} else {
 		err = -ENODEV;
+	}
 
 	rtnl_unlock();
 
@@ -499,7 +501,7 @@ netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(struct net_device *netdev, struct sk_buff *rsp,
 {
 	int err = 0;
 
-	if (!(netdev->flags & IFF_UP))
+	if (!netdev->up)
 		return err;
 
 	for (; ctx->rxq_idx < netdev->real_num_rx_queues; ctx->rxq_idx++) {
@@ -532,13 +534,15 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 
 	rtnl_lock();
 	if (ifindex) {
-		netdev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
-		if (netdev)
+		netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(net, ifindex);
+		if (netdev) {
 			err = netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
-		else
+			netdev_unlock(netdev);
+		} else {
 			err = -ENODEV;
+		}
 	} else {
-		for_each_netdev_dump(net, netdev, ctx->ifindex) {
+		for_each_netdev_lock_scoped(net, netdev, ctx->ifindex) {
 			err = netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
 			if (err < 0)
 				break;
-- 
2.48.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-15  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-15  3:53 [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: use netdev->lock to protect NAPI Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: add netdev_lock() / netdev_unlock() helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  8:21   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  8:36   ` Przemek Kitszel
2025-01-15  9:24     ` Ido Schimmel
2025-01-15 14:08     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15 14:24       ` Przemek Kitszel
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: make netdev_lock() protect netdev->reg_state Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  8:30   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15 14:18     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: add helpers for lookup and walking netdevs under netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  8:41   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/11] net: add netdev->up protected by netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  8:45   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] net: protect netdev->napi_list with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  8:57   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-17 22:21     ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-17 22:52       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: protect NAPI enablement " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  9:02   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-21  8:32   ` Dan Carpenter
2025-01-21  8:50     ` David Laight
2025-01-21 15:27     ` Dan Carpenter
2025-01-15  3:53 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-01-15  9:07   ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: make netdev netlink ops hold netdev_lock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: protect threaded status of NAPI with netdev_lock() Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  9:09   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: protect napi->irq " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  9:12   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] net: protect NAPI config fields " Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  9:15   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-15  3:53 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/11] netdev-genl: remove rtnl_lock protection from NAPI ops Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-15  9:18   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-01-16  3:30 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: use netdev->lock to protect NAPI patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250115035319.559603-8-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.