All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Kurmi, Suresh Kumar" <suresh.kumar.kurmi@intel.com>,
	"Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen@intel.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20250120)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:18:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250123181853.GC1977892@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ1PR11MB6129D7DA59A733AD38E081E3B9E02@SJ1PR11MB6129.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 03:41:08PM +0000, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
> Hello Al,
> 
> Hope you are doing well. I am Chaitanya from the linux graphics team in Intel.
> 
> This mail is regarding a regression we are seeing in our CI runs[1] on linux-next repository.
> 
> Since the version next-20250120 [2], we are seeing the following regression

Ugh...  To narrow the things down, could you see if replacing
                fsd = kmalloc(sizeof(*fsd), GFP_KERNEL);
with
                fsd = kzalloc(sizeof(*fsd), GFP_KERNEL);
in fs/debugfs/file.c:__debugfs_file_get() affects the test?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-23 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-23 15:41 Regression on linux-next (next-20250120) Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-01-23 18:18 ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-01-24 13:55   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-01-26 15:54   ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-01-27  5:04     ` Al Viro
2025-01-28 16:00       ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-01-29  4:37         ` Al Viro
2025-01-29  7:13           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-29 19:19             ` Al Viro
2025-01-30  7:25               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-30  8:08                 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-01-30  8:36                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-27  5:53 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for " Patchwork
2025-01-27  6:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: " Patchwork
2025-01-29 20:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Regression on linux-next (next-20250120) (rev2) Patchwork
2025-01-29 21:11   ` Al Viro
2025-01-30  9:24     ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-29 20:59 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250123181853.GC1977892@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suresh.kumar.kurmi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.