From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Kurmi, Suresh Kumar" <suresh.kumar.kurmi@intel.com>,
"Saarinen, Jani" <jani.saarinen@intel.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Regression on linux-next (next-20250120)
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:19:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250129191937.GR1977892@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025012939-mashing-carport-53bd@gregkh>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 08:13:02AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Both are needed, actually. Slightly longer term I would rather
> > split full_proxy_{read,write,lseek}() into short and full variant,
> > getting rid of the "check which pointer is non-NULL" and killed
> > the two remaining users of debugfs_real_fops() outside of
> > fs/debugfs/file.c; then we could union these ->..._fops pointers,
> > but until then they need to be initialized.
> >
> > And yes, ->methods obviously needs to be initialized.
> >
> > Al, bloody embarrassed ;-/
>
> No worries, want to send a patch to fix both of these up so we can fix
> up Linus's tree now?
[PATCH] Fix the missing initializations in __debugfs_file_get()
both method table pointers in debugfs_fsdata need to be initialized,
obviously, and calculating the bitmap of present methods would also
go better if we start with initialized state.
Fixes: 41a0ecc0997c "debugfs: get rid of dynamically allocation proxy_ops"
Fucked-up-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/fs/debugfs/file.c b/fs/debugfs/file.c
index e33cc77699cd..69e9ddcb113d 100644
--- a/fs/debugfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/debugfs/file.c
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static int __debugfs_file_get(struct dentry *dentry, enum dbgfs_get_mode mode)
fsd = d_fsd;
} else {
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
+ unsigned int methods = 0;
if (WARN_ON(mode == DBGFS_GET_ALREADY))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -106,25 +107,28 @@ static int __debugfs_file_get(struct dentry *dentry, enum dbgfs_get_mode mode)
const struct debugfs_short_fops *ops;
ops = fsd->short_fops = DEBUGFS_I(inode)->short_fops;
if (ops->llseek)
- fsd->methods |= HAS_LSEEK;
+ methods |= HAS_LSEEK;
if (ops->read)
- fsd->methods |= HAS_READ;
+ methods |= HAS_READ;
if (ops->write)
- fsd->methods |= HAS_WRITE;
+ methods |= HAS_WRITE;
+ fsd->real_fops = NULL;
} else {
const struct file_operations *ops;
ops = fsd->real_fops = DEBUGFS_I(inode)->real_fops;
if (ops->llseek)
- fsd->methods |= HAS_LSEEK;
+ methods |= HAS_LSEEK;
if (ops->read)
- fsd->methods |= HAS_READ;
+ methods |= HAS_READ;
if (ops->write)
- fsd->methods |= HAS_WRITE;
+ methods |= HAS_WRITE;
if (ops->unlocked_ioctl)
- fsd->methods |= HAS_IOCTL;
+ methods |= HAS_IOCTL;
if (ops->poll)
- fsd->methods |= HAS_POLL;
+ methods |= HAS_POLL;
+ fsd->short_fops = NULL;
}
+ fsd->methods = methods;
refcount_set(&fsd->active_users, 1);
init_completion(&fsd->active_users_drained);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fsd->cancellations);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-29 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-23 15:41 Regression on linux-next (next-20250120) Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-01-23 18:18 ` Al Viro
2025-01-24 13:55 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-01-26 15:54 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-01-27 5:04 ` Al Viro
2025-01-28 16:00 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-01-29 4:37 ` Al Viro
2025-01-29 7:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-29 19:19 ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-01-30 7:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-30 8:08 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-01-30 8:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-27 5:53 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for " Patchwork
2025-01-27 6:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: " Patchwork
2025-01-29 20:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Regression on linux-next (next-20250120) (rev2) Patchwork
2025-01-29 21:11 ` Al Viro
2025-01-30 9:24 ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-29 20:59 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250129191937.GR1977892@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.saarinen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.kumar.kurmi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.