From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 18/24] locking/rwsem: Support Clang's capability analysis
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 19:10:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206181711.1902989-19-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206181711.1902989-1-elver@google.com>
Add support for Clang's capability analysis for rw_semaphore.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
.../dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst | 2 +-
include/linux/rwsem.h | 56 +++++++++-------
lib/test_capability-analysis.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
index 3766ac466470..719986739b0e 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/capability-analysis.rst
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Supported Kernel Primitives
Currently the following synchronization primitives are supported:
`raw_spinlock_t`, `spinlock_t`, `rwlock_t`, `mutex`, `seqlock_t`,
-`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`).
+`bit_spinlock`, RCU, SRCU (`srcu_struct`), `rw_semaphore`.
For capabilities with an initialization function (e.g., `spin_lock_init()`),
calling this function on the capability instance before initializing any
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h
index c8b543d428b0..0c84e3072370 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
* reduce the chance that they will share the same cacheline causing
* cacheline bouncing problem.
*/
-struct rw_semaphore {
+struct_with_capability(rw_semaphore) {
atomic_long_t count;
/*
* Write owner or one of the read owners as well flags regarding
@@ -76,11 +76,13 @@ static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
}
static inline void rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __asserts_cap(sem)
{
WARN_ON(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE);
}
static inline void rwsem_assert_held_write_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __asserts_cap(sem)
{
WARN_ON(!(atomic_long_read(&sem->count) & RWSEM_WRITER_LOCKED));
}
@@ -119,6 +121,7 @@ do { \
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
\
__init_rwsem((sem), #sem, &__key); \
+ __assert_cap(sem); \
} while (0)
/*
@@ -136,7 +139,7 @@ static inline int rwsem_is_contended(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
#include <linux/rwbase_rt.h>
-struct rw_semaphore {
+struct_with_capability(rw_semaphore) {
struct rwbase_rt rwbase;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
@@ -160,6 +163,7 @@ do { \
static struct lock_class_key __key; \
\
__init_rwsem((sem), #sem, &__key); \
+ __assert_cap(sem); \
} while (0)
static __always_inline int rwsem_is_locked(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
@@ -168,11 +172,13 @@ static __always_inline int rwsem_is_locked(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
}
static __always_inline void rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __asserts_cap(sem)
{
WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(sem));
}
static __always_inline void rwsem_assert_held_write_nolockdep(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __asserts_cap(sem)
{
WARN_ON(!rw_base_is_write_locked(&sem->rwbase));
}
@@ -190,6 +196,7 @@ static __always_inline int rwsem_is_contended(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
*/
static inline void rwsem_assert_held(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __asserts_cap(sem)
{
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP))
lockdep_assert_held(sem);
@@ -198,6 +205,7 @@ static inline void rwsem_assert_held(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
}
static inline void rwsem_assert_held_write(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
+ __asserts_cap(sem)
{
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP))
lockdep_assert_held_write(sem);
@@ -208,47 +216,47 @@ static inline void rwsem_assert_held_write(const struct rw_semaphore *sem)
/*
* lock for reading
*/
-extern void down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern int __must_check down_read_interruptible(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern int __must_check down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __acquires_shared(sem);
+extern int __must_check down_read_interruptible(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires_shared(0, sem);
+extern int __must_check down_read_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires_shared(0, sem);
/*
* trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
-extern int down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern int down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires_shared(1, sem);
/*
* lock for writing
*/
-extern void down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern int __must_check down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __acquires(sem);
+extern int __must_check down_write_killable(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires(0, sem);
/*
* trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
*/
-extern int down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern int down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __cond_acquires(1, sem);
/*
* release a read lock
*/
-extern void up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __releases_shared(sem);
/*
* release a write lock
*/
-extern void up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __releases(sem);
-DEFINE_GUARD(rwsem_read, struct rw_semaphore *, down_read(_T), up_read(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD_COND(rwsem_read, _try, down_read_trylock(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD_COND(rwsem_read, _intr, down_read_interruptible(_T) == 0)
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(rwsem_read, struct rw_semaphore, down_read(_T->lock), up_read(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(rwsem_read, _try, down_read_trylock(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(rwsem_read, _intr, down_read_interruptible(_T->lock) == 0)
-DEFINE_GUARD(rwsem_write, struct rw_semaphore *, down_write(_T), up_write(_T))
-DEFINE_GUARD_COND(rwsem_write, _try, down_write_trylock(_T))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(rwsem_write, struct rw_semaphore, down_write(_T->lock), up_write(_T->lock))
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(rwsem_write, _try, down_write_trylock(_T->lock))
/*
* downgrade write lock to read lock
*/
-extern void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __releases(sem) __acquires_shared(sem);
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
/*
@@ -264,11 +272,11 @@ extern void downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
* lockdep_set_class() at lock initialization time.
* See Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst for more details.)
*/
-extern void down_read_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
-extern int __must_check down_read_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
-extern void down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
-extern int down_write_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass);
-extern void _down_write_nest_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock);
+extern void down_read_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) __acquires_shared(sem);
+extern int __must_check down_read_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) __cond_acquires_shared(0, sem);
+extern void down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) __acquires(sem);
+extern int down_write_killable_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) __cond_acquires(0, sem);
+extern void _down_write_nest_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock) __acquires(sem);
# define down_write_nest_lock(sem, nest_lock) \
do { \
@@ -282,8 +290,8 @@ do { \
* [ This API should be avoided as much as possible - the
* proper abstraction for this case is completions. ]
*/
-extern void down_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
-extern void up_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem);
+extern void down_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __acquires_shared(sem);
+extern void up_read_non_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) __releases_shared(sem);
#else
# define down_read_nested(sem, subclass) down_read(sem)
# define down_read_killable_nested(sem, subclass) down_read_killable(sem)
diff --git a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
index 8bc8c3e6cb5c..4638d220f474 100644
--- a/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
+++ b/lib/test_capability-analysis.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <linux/build_bug.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/rwsem.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/srcu.h>
@@ -255,6 +256,69 @@ static void __used test_seqlock_writer(struct test_seqlock_data *d)
write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&d->sl, flags);
}
+struct test_rwsem_data {
+ struct rw_semaphore sem;
+ int counter __var_guarded_by(&sem);
+};
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_init(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ init_rwsem(&d->sem);
+ d->counter = 0;
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_reader(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ down_read(&d->sem);
+ (void)d->counter;
+ up_read(&d->sem);
+
+ if (down_read_trylock(&d->sem)) {
+ (void)d->counter;
+ up_read(&d->sem);
+ }
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_writer(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ down_write(&d->sem);
+ d->counter++;
+ up_write(&d->sem);
+
+ down_write(&d->sem);
+ d->counter++;
+ downgrade_write(&d->sem);
+ (void)d->counter;
+ up_read(&d->sem);
+
+ if (down_write_trylock(&d->sem)) {
+ d->counter++;
+ up_write(&d->sem);
+ }
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_assert(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ rwsem_assert_held_nolockdep(&d->sem);
+ d->counter++;
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_guard(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ { guard(rwsem_read)(&d->sem); (void)d->counter; }
+ { guard(rwsem_write)(&d->sem); d->counter++; }
+}
+
+static void __used test_rwsem_cond_guard(struct test_rwsem_data *d)
+{
+ scoped_cond_guard(rwsem_read_try, return, &d->sem) {
+ (void)d->counter;
+ }
+ scoped_cond_guard(rwsem_write_try, return, &d->sem) {
+ d->counter++;
+ }
+}
+
struct test_bit_spinlock_data {
unsigned long bits;
int counter __var_guarded_by(__bitlock(3, &bits));
--
2.48.1.502.g6dc24dfdaf-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 18:09 [PATCH RFC 00/24] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 01/24] compiler_types: Move lock checking attributes to compiler-capability-analysis.h Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-06 18:48 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-07 8:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 02/24] compiler-capability-analysis: Rename __cond_lock() to __cond_acquire() Marco Elver
2025-02-07 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-07 9:32 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-07 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-07 9:50 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 03/24] compiler-capability-analysis: Add infrastructure for Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 04/24] compiler-capability-analysis: Add test stub Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:09 ` [PATCH RFC 05/24] Documentation: Add documentation for Compiler-Based Capability Analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 06/24] checkpatch: Warn about capability_unsafe() without comment Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 07/24] cleanup: Basic compatibility with capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 21:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-06 22:01 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 08/24] lockdep: Annotate lockdep assertions for " Marco Elver
2025-02-10 18:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-10 18:23 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-10 18:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-11 13:55 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 09/24] locking/rwlock, spinlock: Support Clang's " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 10/24] compiler-capability-analysis: Change __cond_acquires to take return value Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 11/24] locking/mutex: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-07 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-07 20:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 12/24] locking/seqlock: " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 13/24] bit_spinlock: Include missing <asm/processor.h> Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 14/24] bit_spinlock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 15/24] rcu: " Marco Elver
2025-02-20 22:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-20 22:11 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-20 22:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-21 0:16 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-21 1:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-21 17:10 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-21 18:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-21 18:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-21 19:46 ` Marco Elver
2025-02-21 19:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 16/24] srcu: " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 17/24] kref: Add capability-analysis annotations Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 19/24] locking/local_lock: Support Clang's capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 20/24] debugfs: Make debugfs_cancellation a capability struct Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 21/24] kfence: Enable capability analysis Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 22/24] kcov: " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 23/24] stackdepot: " Marco Elver
2025-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH RFC 24/24] rhashtable: " Marco Elver
2025-02-27 7:00 ` [PATCH RFC 00/24] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250206181711.1902989-19-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.