All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* + zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch added to mm-unstable branch
@ 2025-02-15  0:18 Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2025-02-15  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mm-commits, yosry.ahmed, ryncsn, minchan, hdanton, bigeasy,
	senozhatsky, akpm


The patch titled
     Subject: zram: rework recompression loop
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: zram: rework recompression loop
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 13:50:21 +0900

This reworks recompression loop handling:

- set a rule that stream-put NULLs the stream pointer If the loop
  returns with a non-NULL stream then it's a successfull recompression,
  otherwise the stream should always be NULL.

- do not count the number of recompressions Mark object as
  incompressible as soon as the algorithm with the highest priority failed
  to compress that object.

- count compression errors as resource usage Even if compression has
  failed, we still need to bump num_recomp_pages counter.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250214045208.1388854-10-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c |   53 +++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-rework-recompression-loop
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1929,9 +1929,8 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 	unsigned int comp_len_new;
 	unsigned int class_index_old;
 	unsigned int class_index_new;
-	u32 num_recomps = 0;
 	void *src, *dst;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	handle_old = zram_get_handle(zram, index);
 	if (!handle_old)
@@ -1974,7 +1973,6 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 		if (!zram->comps[prio])
 			continue;
 
-		num_recomps++;
 		zstrm = zcomp_stream_get(zram->comps[prio]);
 		src = kmap_local_page(page);
 		ret = zcomp_compress(zram->comps[prio], zstrm,
@@ -1983,7 +1981,8 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 
 		if (ret) {
 			zcomp_stream_put(zstrm);
-			return ret;
+			zstrm = NULL;
+			break;
 		}
 
 		class_index_new = zs_lookup_class_index(zram->mem_pool,
@@ -1993,6 +1992,7 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 		if (class_index_new >= class_index_old ||
 		    (threshold && comp_len_new >= threshold)) {
 			zcomp_stream_put(zstrm);
+			zstrm = NULL;
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -2001,14 +2001,6 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * We did not try to recompress, e.g. when we have only one
-	 * secondary algorithm and the page is already recompressed
-	 * using that algorithm
-	 */
-	if (!zstrm)
-		return 0;
-
-	/*
 	 * Decrement the limit (if set) on pages we can recompress, even
 	 * when current recompression was unsuccessful or did not compress
 	 * the page below the threshold, because we still spent resources
@@ -2017,38 +2009,31 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 	if (*num_recomp_pages)
 		*num_recomp_pages -= 1;
 
-	if (class_index_new >= class_index_old) {
+	/* Compression error */
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!zstrm) {
 		/*
 		 * Secondary algorithms failed to re-compress the page
-		 * in a way that would save memory, mark the object as
-		 * incompressible so that we will not try to compress
-		 * it again.
+		 * in a way that would save memory.
 		 *
-		 * We need to make sure that all secondary algorithms have
-		 * failed, so we test if the number of recompressions matches
-		 * the number of active secondary algorithms.
+		 * Mark the object incompressible if the max-priority
+		 * algorithm couldn't re-compress it.
 		 */
-		if (num_recomps == zram->num_active_comps - 1)
-			zram_set_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_INCOMPRESSIBLE);
+		if (prio < zram->num_active_comps)
+			return 0;
+		zram_set_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_INCOMPRESSIBLE);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	/* Successful recompression but above threshold */
-	if (threshold && comp_len_new >= threshold)
-		return 0;
-
 	/*
-	 * No direct reclaim (slow path) for handle allocation and no
-	 * re-compression attempt (unlike in zram_write_bvec()) since
-	 * we already have stored that object in zsmalloc. If we cannot
-	 * alloc memory for recompressed object then we bail out and
-	 * simply keep the old (existing) object in zsmalloc.
+	 * We are holding per-CPU stream mutex and entry lock so better
+	 * avoid direct reclaim.  Allocation error is not fatal since
+	 * we still have the old object in the mem_pool.
 	 */
 	handle_new = zs_malloc(zram->mem_pool, comp_len_new,
-			       __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM |
-			       __GFP_NOWARN |
-			       __GFP_HIGHMEM |
-			       __GFP_MOVABLE);
+			       GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_MOVABLE);
 	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(handle_new)) {
 		zcomp_stream_put(zstrm);
 		return PTR_ERR((void *)handle_new);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from senozhatsky@chromium.org are

zram-sleepable-entry-locking.patch
zram-permit-preemption-with-active-compression-stream.patch
zram-remove-unused-crypto-include.patch
zram-remove-max_comp_streams-device-attr.patch
zram-remove-two-staged-handle-allocation.patch
zram-remove-writestall-zram_stats-member.patch
zram-limit-max-recompress-prio-to-num_active_comps.patch
zram-filter-out-recomp-targets-based-on-priority.patch
zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch
zsmalloc-rename-pool-lock.patch
zsmalloc-make-zspage-lock-preemptible.patch
zsmalloc-introduce-new-object-mapping-api.patch
zram-switch-to-new-zsmalloc-object-mapping-api.patch
zram-permit-reclaim-in-zstd-custom-allocator.patch
zram-do-not-leak-page-on-recompress_store-error-path.patch
zram-do-not-leak-page-on-writeback_store-error-path.patch
zram-add-might_sleep-to-zcomp-api.patch


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* + zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch added to mm-unstable branch
@ 2025-02-21 23:42 Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2025-02-21 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mm-commits, yosry.ahmed, minchan, hdanton, bigeasy, senozhatsky,
	akpm


The patch titled
     Subject: zram: rework recompression loop
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: zram: rework recompression loop
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 07:25:40 +0900

This reworks recompression loop handling:

- set a rule that stream-put NULLs the stream pointer If the loop
  returns with a non-NULL stream then it's a successfull recompression,
  otherwise the stream should always be NULL.

- do not count the number of recompressions Mark object as
  incompressible as soon as the algorithm with the highest priority failed
  to compress that object.

- count compression errors as resource usage Even if compression has
  failed, we still need to bump num_recomp_pages counter.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250221222958.2225035-10-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c |   53 +++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-rework-recompression-loop
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1892,9 +1892,8 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 	unsigned int comp_len_new;
 	unsigned int class_index_old;
 	unsigned int class_index_new;
-	u32 num_recomps = 0;
 	void *src, *dst;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	handle_old = zram_get_handle(zram, index);
 	if (!handle_old)
@@ -1937,7 +1936,6 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 		if (!zram->comps[prio])
 			continue;
 
-		num_recomps++;
 		zstrm = zcomp_stream_get(zram->comps[prio]);
 		src = kmap_local_page(page);
 		ret = zcomp_compress(zram->comps[prio], zstrm,
@@ -1946,7 +1944,8 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 
 		if (ret) {
 			zcomp_stream_put(zstrm);
-			return ret;
+			zstrm = NULL;
+			break;
 		}
 
 		class_index_new = zs_lookup_class_index(zram->mem_pool,
@@ -1956,6 +1955,7 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 		if (class_index_new >= class_index_old ||
 		    (threshold && comp_len_new >= threshold)) {
 			zcomp_stream_put(zstrm);
+			zstrm = NULL;
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -1964,14 +1964,6 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * We did not try to recompress, e.g. when we have only one
-	 * secondary algorithm and the page is already recompressed
-	 * using that algorithm
-	 */
-	if (!zstrm)
-		return 0;
-
-	/*
 	 * Decrement the limit (if set) on pages we can recompress, even
 	 * when current recompression was unsuccessful or did not compress
 	 * the page below the threshold, because we still spent resources
@@ -1980,38 +1972,31 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 	if (*num_recomp_pages)
 		*num_recomp_pages -= 1;
 
-	if (class_index_new >= class_index_old) {
+	/* Compression error */
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!zstrm) {
 		/*
 		 * Secondary algorithms failed to re-compress the page
-		 * in a way that would save memory, mark the object as
-		 * incompressible so that we will not try to compress
-		 * it again.
+		 * in a way that would save memory.
 		 *
-		 * We need to make sure that all secondary algorithms have
-		 * failed, so we test if the number of recompressions matches
-		 * the number of active secondary algorithms.
+		 * Mark the object incompressible if the max-priority
+		 * algorithm couldn't re-compress it.
 		 */
-		if (num_recomps == zram->num_active_comps - 1)
-			zram_set_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_INCOMPRESSIBLE);
+		if (prio < zram->num_active_comps)
+			return 0;
+		zram_set_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_INCOMPRESSIBLE);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	/* Successful recompression but above threshold */
-	if (threshold && comp_len_new >= threshold)
-		return 0;
-
 	/*
-	 * No direct reclaim (slow path) for handle allocation and no
-	 * re-compression attempt (unlike in zram_write_bvec()) since
-	 * we already have stored that object in zsmalloc. If we cannot
-	 * alloc memory for recompressed object then we bail out and
-	 * simply keep the old (existing) object in zsmalloc.
+	 * We are holding per-CPU stream mutex and entry lock so better
+	 * avoid direct reclaim.  Allocation error is not fatal since
+	 * we still have the old object in the mem_pool.
 	 */
 	handle_new = zs_malloc(zram->mem_pool, comp_len_new,
-			       __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM |
-			       __GFP_NOWARN |
-			       __GFP_HIGHMEM |
-			       __GFP_MOVABLE);
+			       GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_MOVABLE);
 	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(handle_new)) {
 		zcomp_stream_put(zstrm);
 		return PTR_ERR((void *)handle_new);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from senozhatsky@chromium.org are

zram-sleepable-entry-locking.patch
zram-permit-preemption-with-active-compression-stream.patch
zram-remove-unused-crypto-include.patch
zram-remove-max_comp_streams-device-attr.patch
zram-remove-second-stage-of-handle-allocation.patch
zram-remove-writestall-zram_stats-member.patch
zram-limit-max-recompress-prio-to-num_active_comps.patch
zram-filter-out-recomp-targets-based-on-priority.patch
zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch
zsmalloc-rename-pool-lock.patch
zsmalloc-make-zspage-lock-preemptible.patch
zsmalloc-introduce-new-object-mapping-api.patch
zram-switch-to-new-zsmalloc-object-mapping-api.patch
zram-permit-reclaim-in-zstd-custom-allocator.patch
zram-do-not-leak-page-on-recompress_store-error-path.patch
zram-do-not-leak-page-on-writeback_store-error-path.patch
zram-add-might_sleep-to-zcomp-api.patch
zsmalloc-zram-there-be-preemption.patch


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* + zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch added to mm-unstable branch
@ 2025-03-04  0:38 Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2025-03-04  0:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mm-commits, yosry.ahmed, ryncsn, minchan, hdanton, bigeasy,
	senozhatsky, akpm


The patch titled
     Subject: zram: rework recompression loop
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: zram: rework recompression loop
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:03:19 +0900

This reworks recompression loop handling:

- set a rule that stream-put NULLs the stream pointer If the loop
  returns with a non-NULL stream then it's a successful recompression,
  otherwise the stream should always be NULL.

- do not count the number of recompressions Mark object as
  incompressible as soon as the algorithm with the highest priority failed
  to compress that object.

- count compression errors as resource usage Even if compression has
  failed, we still need to bump num_recomp_pages counter.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250303022425.285971-11-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c |   54 +++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c~zram-rework-recompression-loop
+++ a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1888,9 +1888,8 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 	unsigned int comp_len_new;
 	unsigned int class_index_old;
 	unsigned int class_index_new;
-	u32 num_recomps = 0;
 	void *src, *dst;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	handle_old = zram_get_handle(zram, index);
 	if (!handle_old)
@@ -1933,7 +1932,6 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 		if (!zram->comps[prio])
 			continue;
 
-		num_recomps++;
 		zstrm = zcomp_stream_get(zram->comps[prio]);
 		src = kmap_local_page(page);
 		ret = zcomp_compress(zram->comps[prio], zstrm,
@@ -1942,7 +1940,8 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 
 		if (ret) {
 			zcomp_stream_put(zstrm);
-			return ret;
+			zstrm = NULL;
+			break;
 		}
 
 		class_index_new = zs_lookup_class_index(zram->mem_pool,
@@ -1952,6 +1951,7 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 		if (class_index_new >= class_index_old ||
 		    (threshold && comp_len_new >= threshold)) {
 			zcomp_stream_put(zstrm);
+			zstrm = NULL;
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -1960,14 +1960,6 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * We did not try to recompress, e.g. when we have only one
-	 * secondary algorithm and the page is already recompressed
-	 * using that algorithm
-	 */
-	if (!zstrm)
-		return 0;
-
-	/*
 	 * Decrement the limit (if set) on pages we can recompress, even
 	 * when current recompression was unsuccessful or did not compress
 	 * the page below the threshold, because we still spent resources
@@ -1976,38 +1968,32 @@ static int recompress_slot(struct zram *
 	if (*num_recomp_pages)
 		*num_recomp_pages -= 1;
 
-	if (class_index_new >= class_index_old) {
+	/* Compression error */
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!zstrm) {
 		/*
 		 * Secondary algorithms failed to re-compress the page
-		 * in a way that would save memory, mark the object as
-		 * incompressible so that we will not try to compress
-		 * it again.
+		 * in a way that would save memory.
 		 *
-		 * We need to make sure that all secondary algorithms have
-		 * failed, so we test if the number of recompressions matches
-		 * the number of active secondary algorithms.
+		 * Mark the object incompressible if the max-priority
+		 * algorithm couldn't re-compress it.
 		 */
-		if (num_recomps == zram->num_active_comps - 1)
-			zram_set_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_INCOMPRESSIBLE);
+		if (prio < zram->num_active_comps)
+			return 0;
+		zram_set_flag(zram, index, ZRAM_INCOMPRESSIBLE);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	/* Successful recompression but above threshold */
-	if (threshold && comp_len_new >= threshold)
-		return 0;
-
 	/*
-	 * No direct reclaim (slow path) for handle allocation and no
-	 * re-compression attempt (unlike in zram_write_bvec()) since
-	 * we already have stored that object in zsmalloc. If we cannot
-	 * alloc memory for recompressed object then we bail out and
-	 * simply keep the old (existing) object in zsmalloc.
+	 * We are holding per-CPU stream mutex and entry lock so better
+	 * avoid direct reclaim.  Allocation error is not fatal since
+	 * we still have the old object in the mem_pool.
 	 */
 	handle_new = zs_malloc(zram->mem_pool, comp_len_new,
-			       __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM |
-			       __GFP_NOWARN |
-			       __GFP_HIGHMEM |
-			       __GFP_MOVABLE);
+			       GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NOWARN |
+			       __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_MOVABLE);
 	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(handle_new)) {
 		zcomp_stream_put(zstrm);
 		return PTR_ERR((void *)handle_new);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from senozhatsky@chromium.org are

zram-sleepable-entry-locking.patch
zram-permit-preemption-with-active-compression-stream.patch
zram-remove-unused-crypto-include.patch
zram-remove-max_comp_streams-device-attr.patch
zram-remove-second-stage-of-handle-allocation.patch
zram-add-gfp_nowarn-to-incompressible-zsmalloc-handle-allocation.patch
zram-remove-writestall-zram_stats-member.patch
zram-limit-max-recompress-prio-to-num_active_comps.patch
zram-filter-out-recomp-targets-based-on-priority.patch
zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch
zram-move-post-processing-target-allocation.patch
zsmalloc-rename-pool-lock.patch
zsmalloc-sleepable-zspage-reader-lock.patch
zsmalloc-introduce-new-object-mapping-api.patch
zram-switch-to-new-zsmalloc-object-mapping-api.patch
zram-permit-reclaim-in-zstd-custom-allocator.patch
zram-do-not-leak-page-on-recompress_store-error-path.patch
zram-do-not-leak-page-on-writeback_store-error-path.patch
zram-add-might_sleep-to-zcomp-api.patch


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-04  0:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-15  0:18 + zram-rework-recompression-loop.patch added to mm-unstable branch Andrew Morton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-21 23:42 Andrew Morton
2025-03-04  0:38 Andrew Morton

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.