* crypto: fscrypt: crypto_create_tfm_node memory leak
@ 2025-02-17 18:43 ` Lucas Tanure
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lucas Tanure @ 2025-02-17 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies, linux-fscrypt, LKML, linux-crypto
Cc: krzysztof.opasiak@neat.no, lucas.tanure@neat.no
Hi,
I am working with Android 13 and V5.15 kernel. During our development,
I found a memory leak using kmemleak.
Steps I did to find the memleak:
mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug
echo scan=5 > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
Stack I got (hundreds of them):
unreferenced object 0xffffff8101d31000 (size 1024):
comm "binder:1357_2", pid 1357, jiffies 4294899464 (age 394.468s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffd327cac060>] crypto_create_tfm_node+0x64/0x228
[<ffffffd3279f8c4c>] fscrypt_prepare_key+0xbc/0x230
[<ffffffd3279f9758>] fscrypt_setup_v1_file_key+0x48c/0x510
[<ffffffd3279f8394>] fscrypt_setup_encryption_info+0x210/0x43c
[<ffffffd3279f8108>] fscrypt_prepare_new_inode+0x128/0x1a4
[<ffffffd327bcc878>] f2fs_new_inode+0x27c/0x89c
[<ffffffd327bce7c4>] f2fs_mkdir+0x78/0x278
[<ffffffd32796a3bc>] vfs_mkdir+0x138/0x204
[<ffffffd32796a108>] do_mkdirat+0x88/0x204
[<ffffffd32796a068>] __arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x40/0x58
[<ffffffd3274be5d4>] invoke_syscall+0x60/0x150
[<ffffffd3274be528>] el0_svc_common+0xc8/0x114
[<ffffffd3274be3f0>] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x98
[<ffffffd328abcf88>] el0_svc+0x28/0x90
[<ffffffd328abcefc>] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec
[<ffffffd32741164c>] el0t_64_sync+0x1b8/0x1bc
After checking upstream, I came up with the following:
cff805b1518f fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure
But my kernel has this patch. So I continued to dig around this and
saw the function fscrypt_prepare_key in fs/crypto/keysetup.c for
V5.15.
I can't see the pointer tfm being used anywhere or saved, and
smp_store_release doesn't kfree it.
Is smp_store_release doing something with that pointer that makes this
memory leak a false positive?
Any help with this issue would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Lucas Tanure
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* crypto: fscrypt: crypto_create_tfm_node memory leak
@ 2025-02-17 18:43 ` Lucas Tanure
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lucas Tanure @ 2025-02-17 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernelnewbies, linux-fscrypt, LKML, linux-crypto
Cc: lucas.tanure@neat.no, krzysztof.opasiak@neat.no
Hi,
I am working with Android 13 and V5.15 kernel. During our development,
I found a memory leak using kmemleak.
Steps I did to find the memleak:
mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug
echo scan=5 > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
Stack I got (hundreds of them):
unreferenced object 0xffffff8101d31000 (size 1024):
comm "binder:1357_2", pid 1357, jiffies 4294899464 (age 394.468s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffd327cac060>] crypto_create_tfm_node+0x64/0x228
[<ffffffd3279f8c4c>] fscrypt_prepare_key+0xbc/0x230
[<ffffffd3279f9758>] fscrypt_setup_v1_file_key+0x48c/0x510
[<ffffffd3279f8394>] fscrypt_setup_encryption_info+0x210/0x43c
[<ffffffd3279f8108>] fscrypt_prepare_new_inode+0x128/0x1a4
[<ffffffd327bcc878>] f2fs_new_inode+0x27c/0x89c
[<ffffffd327bce7c4>] f2fs_mkdir+0x78/0x278
[<ffffffd32796a3bc>] vfs_mkdir+0x138/0x204
[<ffffffd32796a108>] do_mkdirat+0x88/0x204
[<ffffffd32796a068>] __arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x40/0x58
[<ffffffd3274be5d4>] invoke_syscall+0x60/0x150
[<ffffffd3274be528>] el0_svc_common+0xc8/0x114
[<ffffffd3274be3f0>] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x98
[<ffffffd328abcf88>] el0_svc+0x28/0x90
[<ffffffd328abcefc>] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec
[<ffffffd32741164c>] el0t_64_sync+0x1b8/0x1bc
After checking upstream, I came up with the following:
cff805b1518f fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure
But my kernel has this patch. So I continued to dig around this and
saw the function fscrypt_prepare_key in fs/crypto/keysetup.c for
V5.15.
I can't see the pointer tfm being used anywhere or saved, and
smp_store_release doesn't kfree it.
Is smp_store_release doing something with that pointer that makes this
memory leak a false positive?
Any help with this issue would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Lucas Tanure
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: crypto: fscrypt: crypto_create_tfm_node memory leak
2025-02-17 18:43 ` Lucas Tanure
(?)
@ 2025-02-17 18:50 ` Eric Biggers
2025-02-17 19:08 ` Lucas Tanure
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2025-02-17 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lucas Tanure
Cc: kernelnewbies, linux-fscrypt, LKML, linux-crypto,
krzysztof.opasiak@neat.no, lucas.tanure@neat.no
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 06:43:15PM +0000, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working with Android 13 and V5.15 kernel. During our development,
> I found a memory leak using kmemleak.
>
> Steps I did to find the memleak:
> mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug
> echo scan=5 > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
>
> Stack I got (hundreds of them):
> unreferenced object 0xffffff8101d31000 (size 1024):
> comm "binder:1357_2", pid 1357, jiffies 4294899464 (age 394.468s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffd327cac060>] crypto_create_tfm_node+0x64/0x228
> [<ffffffd3279f8c4c>] fscrypt_prepare_key+0xbc/0x230
> [<ffffffd3279f9758>] fscrypt_setup_v1_file_key+0x48c/0x510
> [<ffffffd3279f8394>] fscrypt_setup_encryption_info+0x210/0x43c
> [<ffffffd3279f8108>] fscrypt_prepare_new_inode+0x128/0x1a4
> [<ffffffd327bcc878>] f2fs_new_inode+0x27c/0x89c
> [<ffffffd327bce7c4>] f2fs_mkdir+0x78/0x278
> [<ffffffd32796a3bc>] vfs_mkdir+0x138/0x204
> [<ffffffd32796a108>] do_mkdirat+0x88/0x204
> [<ffffffd32796a068>] __arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x40/0x58
> [<ffffffd3274be5d4>] invoke_syscall+0x60/0x150
> [<ffffffd3274be528>] el0_svc_common+0xc8/0x114
> [<ffffffd3274be3f0>] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x98
> [<ffffffd328abcf88>] el0_svc+0x28/0x90
> [<ffffffd328abcefc>] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec
> [<ffffffd32741164c>] el0t_64_sync+0x1b8/0x1bc
>
> After checking upstream, I came up with the following:
> cff805b1518f fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure
>
> But my kernel has this patch. So I continued to dig around this and
> saw the function fscrypt_prepare_key in fs/crypto/keysetup.c for
> V5.15.
> I can't see the pointer tfm being used anywhere or saved, and
> smp_store_release doesn't kfree it.
> Is smp_store_release doing something with that pointer that makes this
> memory leak a false positive?
>
> Any help with this issue would be much appreciated.
> Thanks
The pointer to the crypto_skcipher 'tfm' is stored in the fscrypt_inode_info
(previously fscrypt_info) which is stored in inode::i_crypt_info. It gets freed
when the inode is evicted. I don't know why you're getting a kmemleak warning.
Perhaps f2fs in that version of the kernel has a bug that is leaking inodes.
smp_store_release is just a fancy way of doing a store that includes a memory
barrier.
- Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: crypto: fscrypt: crypto_create_tfm_node memory leak
2025-02-17 18:50 ` Eric Biggers
@ 2025-02-17 19:08 ` Lucas Tanure
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lucas Tanure @ 2025-02-17 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Biggers
Cc: kernelnewbies, linux-fscrypt, LKML, linux-crypto,
krzysztof.opasiak@neat.no, lucas.tanure@neat.no
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 6:50 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 06:43:15PM +0000, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am working with Android 13 and V5.15 kernel. During our development,
> > I found a memory leak using kmemleak.
> >
> > Steps I did to find the memleak:
> > mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug
> > echo scan=5 > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> > cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> >
> > Stack I got (hundreds of them):
> > unreferenced object 0xffffff8101d31000 (size 1024):
> > comm "binder:1357_2", pid 1357, jiffies 4294899464 (age 394.468s)
> > hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> > backtrace:
> > [<ffffffd327cac060>] crypto_create_tfm_node+0x64/0x228
> > [<ffffffd3279f8c4c>] fscrypt_prepare_key+0xbc/0x230
> > [<ffffffd3279f9758>] fscrypt_setup_v1_file_key+0x48c/0x510
> > [<ffffffd3279f8394>] fscrypt_setup_encryption_info+0x210/0x43c
> > [<ffffffd3279f8108>] fscrypt_prepare_new_inode+0x128/0x1a4
> > [<ffffffd327bcc878>] f2fs_new_inode+0x27c/0x89c
> > [<ffffffd327bce7c4>] f2fs_mkdir+0x78/0x278
> > [<ffffffd32796a3bc>] vfs_mkdir+0x138/0x204
> > [<ffffffd32796a108>] do_mkdirat+0x88/0x204
> > [<ffffffd32796a068>] __arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x40/0x58
> > [<ffffffd3274be5d4>] invoke_syscall+0x60/0x150
> > [<ffffffd3274be528>] el0_svc_common+0xc8/0x114
> > [<ffffffd3274be3f0>] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x98
> > [<ffffffd328abcf88>] el0_svc+0x28/0x90
> > [<ffffffd328abcefc>] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec
> > [<ffffffd32741164c>] el0t_64_sync+0x1b8/0x1bc
> >
> > After checking upstream, I came up with the following:
> > cff805b1518f fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure
> >
> > But my kernel has this patch. So I continued to dig around this and
> > saw the function fscrypt_prepare_key in fs/crypto/keysetup.c for
> > V5.15.
> > I can't see the pointer tfm being used anywhere or saved, and
> > smp_store_release doesn't kfree it.
> > Is smp_store_release doing something with that pointer that makes this
> > memory leak a false positive?
> >
> > Any help with this issue would be much appreciated.
> > Thanks
>
> The pointer to the crypto_skcipher 'tfm' is stored in the fscrypt_inode_info
> (previously fscrypt_info) which is stored in inode::i_crypt_info. It gets freed
> when the inode is evicted. I don't know why you're getting a kmemleak warning.
> Perhaps f2fs in that version of the kernel has a bug that is leaking inodes.
>
Thanks. How do you check for leaking inodes? Do you have any start
point (function) to look at?
> smp_store_release is just a fancy way of doing a store that includes a memory
> barrier.
>
> - Eric
Lucas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: crypto: fscrypt: crypto_create_tfm_node memory leak
@ 2025-02-17 19:08 ` Lucas Tanure
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lucas Tanure @ 2025-02-17 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Biggers
Cc: kernelnewbies, LKML, lucas.tanure@neat.no, linux-fscrypt,
linux-crypto, krzysztof.opasiak@neat.no
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 6:50 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 06:43:15PM +0000, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am working with Android 13 and V5.15 kernel. During our development,
> > I found a memory leak using kmemleak.
> >
> > Steps I did to find the memleak:
> > mount -t debugfs debugfs /sys/kernel/debug
> > echo scan=5 > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> > cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> >
> > Stack I got (hundreds of them):
> > unreferenced object 0xffffff8101d31000 (size 1024):
> > comm "binder:1357_2", pid 1357, jiffies 4294899464 (age 394.468s)
> > hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> > backtrace:
> > [<ffffffd327cac060>] crypto_create_tfm_node+0x64/0x228
> > [<ffffffd3279f8c4c>] fscrypt_prepare_key+0xbc/0x230
> > [<ffffffd3279f9758>] fscrypt_setup_v1_file_key+0x48c/0x510
> > [<ffffffd3279f8394>] fscrypt_setup_encryption_info+0x210/0x43c
> > [<ffffffd3279f8108>] fscrypt_prepare_new_inode+0x128/0x1a4
> > [<ffffffd327bcc878>] f2fs_new_inode+0x27c/0x89c
> > [<ffffffd327bce7c4>] f2fs_mkdir+0x78/0x278
> > [<ffffffd32796a3bc>] vfs_mkdir+0x138/0x204
> > [<ffffffd32796a108>] do_mkdirat+0x88/0x204
> > [<ffffffd32796a068>] __arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x40/0x58
> > [<ffffffd3274be5d4>] invoke_syscall+0x60/0x150
> > [<ffffffd3274be528>] el0_svc_common+0xc8/0x114
> > [<ffffffd3274be3f0>] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x98
> > [<ffffffd328abcf88>] el0_svc+0x28/0x90
> > [<ffffffd328abcefc>] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec
> > [<ffffffd32741164c>] el0t_64_sync+0x1b8/0x1bc
> >
> > After checking upstream, I came up with the following:
> > cff805b1518f fscrypt: fix keyring memory leak on mount failure
> >
> > But my kernel has this patch. So I continued to dig around this and
> > saw the function fscrypt_prepare_key in fs/crypto/keysetup.c for
> > V5.15.
> > I can't see the pointer tfm being used anywhere or saved, and
> > smp_store_release doesn't kfree it.
> > Is smp_store_release doing something with that pointer that makes this
> > memory leak a false positive?
> >
> > Any help with this issue would be much appreciated.
> > Thanks
>
> The pointer to the crypto_skcipher 'tfm' is stored in the fscrypt_inode_info
> (previously fscrypt_info) which is stored in inode::i_crypt_info. It gets freed
> when the inode is evicted. I don't know why you're getting a kmemleak warning.
> Perhaps f2fs in that version of the kernel has a bug that is leaking inodes.
>
Thanks. How do you check for leaking inodes? Do you have any start
point (function) to look at?
> smp_store_release is just a fancy way of doing a store that includes a memory
> barrier.
>
> - Eric
Lucas
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-17 19:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-17 18:43 crypto: fscrypt: crypto_create_tfm_node memory leak Lucas Tanure
2025-02-17 18:43 ` Lucas Tanure
2025-02-17 18:50 ` Eric Biggers
2025-02-17 19:08 ` Lucas Tanure
2025-02-17 19:08 ` Lucas Tanure
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.