From: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@samsung.com>
To: Anuj gupta <anuj1072538@gmail.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, M Nikhil <nikh1092@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
Nihar Panda <niharp@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Change in reported values of some block integrity sysfs attributes
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:05:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250221103554.GA28830@green245> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACzX3AvbM4qG+ZOWJoCTNMMgSz8gMjoRcQ10_HJbMyi0Nv9qvQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2886 bytes --]
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 04:07:55PM +0530, Anuj gupta wrote:
> > I don't see any change in what's reported with block/for-next in a
> > regular SCSI HBA/disk setup. Will have to look at whether there is a
> > stacking issue wrt. multipathing.
>
> Hi Martin, Christoph,
>
> It seems this change in behaviour is not limited to SCSI only. As Nikhil
> mentioned an earlier commit
> [9f4aa46f2a74 ("block: invert the BLK_INTEGRITY_{GENERATE,VERIFY} flags")]
> causes this change in behaviour. On my setup with a NVMe drive not formatted
> with PI, I see that:
>
> Without this commit:
> Value reported by read_verify and write_generate sysfs entries is 0.
>
> With this commit:
> Value reported by read_verify and write_generate sysfs entries is 1.
>
> Diving a bit deeper, both these flags got inverted due to this commit.
> But during init (in nvme_init_integrity) these values get initialized to 0,
> inturn setting the sysfs entries to 1. In order to fix this, the driver has to
> initialize both these flags to 1 in nvme_init_integrity if PI is not supported.
> That way, the value in sysfs for these entries would become 0 again. Tried this
> approach in my setup, and I am able to see the right values now. Then something
> like this would also need to be done for SCSI too.
This is the patch that I used:
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 818d4e49aab5..6cd9f57131cc 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1799,6 +1799,7 @@ static bool nvme_init_integrity(struct nvme_ns_head *head,
memset(bi, 0, sizeof(*bi));
+ bi->flags |= BLK_INTEGRITY_NOGENERATE | BLK_INTEGRITY_NOVERIFY;
if (!head->ms)
return true;
@@ -1817,11 +1818,15 @@ static bool nvme_init_integrity(struct nvme_ns_head *head,
bi->csum_type = BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_CRC;
bi->tag_size = sizeof(u16) + sizeof(u32);
bi->flags |= BLK_INTEGRITY_DEVICE_CAPABLE;
+ bi->flags &= ~(BLK_INTEGRITY_NOGENERATE |
+ BLK_INTEGRITY_NOVERIFY);
break;
case NVME_NVM_NS_64B_GUARD:
bi->csum_type = BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_CRC64;
bi->tag_size = sizeof(u16) + 6;
bi->flags |= BLK_INTEGRITY_DEVICE_CAPABLE;
+ bi->flags &= ~(BLK_INTEGRITY_NOGENERATE |
+ BLK_INTEGRITY_NOVERIFY);
break;
default:
break;
@@ -1835,12 +1840,16 @@ static bool nvme_init_integrity(struct nvme_ns_head *head,
bi->tag_size = sizeof(u16);
bi->flags |= BLK_INTEGRITY_DEVICE_CAPABLE |
BLK_INTEGRITY_REF_TAG;
+ bi->flags &= ~(BLK_INTEGRITY_NOGENERATE |
+ BLK_INTEGRITY_NOVERIFY);
break;
case NVME_NVM_NS_64B_GUARD:
bi->csum_type = BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_CRC64;
bi->tag_size = sizeof(u16);
bi->flags |= BLK_INTEGRITY_DEVICE_CAPABLE |
BLK_INTEGRITY_REF_TAG;
+ bi->flags &= ~(BLK_INTEGRITY_NOGENERATE |
+ BLK_INTEGRITY_NOVERIFY);
break;
default:
break;
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-21 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-13 7:16 Change in reported values of some block integrity sysfs attributes M Nikhil
2024-12-13 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-12-17 12:46 ` M Nikhil
2024-12-13 22:30 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-12-17 12:39 ` M Nikhil
2025-02-21 6:01 ` M Nikhil
2025-02-21 10:37 ` Anuj gupta
2025-02-21 10:35 ` Anuj Gupta [this message]
2025-02-21 12:07 ` Anuj Gupta
2025-02-25 1:07 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250221103554.GA28830@green245 \
--to=anuj20.g@samsung.com \
--cc=anuj1072538@gmail.com \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maier@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=niharp@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nikh1092@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.