From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, saurabhg.gupta@intel.com,
alex.zuo@intel.com, jonathan.cavitt@intel.com,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, matthew.brost@intel.com,
jianxun.zhang@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/xe_vm: Implement xe_vm_get_property_ioctl
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 13:14:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202502271226.qHKoHhA5-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250226225557.133076-7-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Hi Jonathan,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-xe/drm-xe-next]
[also build test ERROR on next-20250226]
[cannot apply to linus/master v6.14-rc4]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jonathan-Cavitt/drm-xe-xe_gt_pagefault-Migrate-lookup_vma-to-xe_vm-h/20250227-070008
base: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel.git drm-xe-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250226225557.133076-7-jonathan.cavitt%40intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/xe_vm: Implement xe_vm_get_property_ioctl
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-002-20250227 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250227/202502271226.qHKoHhA5-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250227/202502271226.qHKoHhA5-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502271226.qHKoHhA5-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c: In function 'xe_pagefault_access_type_to_address_type':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3288:9: error: 'vma' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'vm'?
3288 | vma = lookup_vma(vm, pf->page_addr);
| ^~~
| vm
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3288:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:3288:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'lookup_vma' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
3288 | vma = lookup_vma(vm, pf->page_addr);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +3288 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
3281
3282 static enum drm_xe_fault_address_type
3283 xe_pagefault_access_type_to_address_type(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_pagefault *pf)
3284 {
3285 if (!pf)
3286 return 0;
3287
> 3288 vma = lookup_vma(vm, pf->page_addr);
3289 if (!vma)
3290 return DRM_XE_FAULT_ADDRESS_TYPE_NONE_EXT;
3291 if (xe_vma_read_only(vma) && pf->access_type != XE_PAGEFAULT_ACCESS_TYPE_READ)
3292 return DRM_XE_FAULT_ADDRESS_TYPE_WRITE_INVALID_EXT;
3293 return 0;
3294 }
3295
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-27 5:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-26 22:55 [PATCH 0/6] drm/xe/xe_vm: Implement xe_vm_get_property_ioctl Jonathan Cavitt
2025-02-26 22:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault: Migrate lookup_vma to xe_vm.h Jonathan Cavitt
2025-02-26 22:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/xe_exec_queue: Add ID param to exec queue struct Jonathan Cavitt
2025-02-26 22:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe/xe_gt_pagefault: Migrate pagefault struct to header Jonathan Cavitt
2025-02-26 22:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe/xe_vm: Add per VM pagefault info Jonathan Cavitt
2025-02-26 22:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/xe_vm: Add per VM reset stats Jonathan Cavitt
2025-02-26 22:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/xe_vm: Implement xe_vm_get_property_ioctl Jonathan Cavitt
2025-02-27 2:36 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-27 5:14 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-02-27 8:25 ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-27 16:51 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-02-28 3:34 ` Matthew Brost
2025-02-27 0:11 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for " Patchwork
2025-02-27 0:12 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-27 0:12 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202502271226.qHKoHhA5-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=alex.zuo@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jianxun.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=saurabhg.gupta@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.