All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ima_violations.sh: Update validate() to support multiple violations
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 18:43:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304174342.GA97130@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54cf5311ec5e0debd6dfd63669e8d01883c0ba23.camel@linux.ibm.com>

> On Tue, 2025-03-04 at 09:44 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-03-04 at 14:31 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > Hi Mimi,

> > > > Add support for the number of expected violations.  Include the
> > > > expected number of violations in the output.

> > > Unfortunately this works only on fixed kernel (e.g. the one with v1 of your
> > > "ima: limit both open-writers and ToMToU violations" kernel patchset [1]
> > > (I haven't built v2 [2], but it's really just
> > > s/IMA_LIMIT_VIOLATIONS/IMA_EMITTED_OPENWRITERS/ => it will work)

> > > Testing on any other kernel it fails on first testing after reboot:

> > Hi Petr,

> > I only tested by specifying the "ima_policy=tcb" on the boot command line.  This
> > failure happens when loading the test specific policy rules.  If setup() is
> > called before loading the test specific policy rules, forcing the $LOG file
> > violation at setup() would be too early.

> Sorry, that doesn't seem to be the case.

> With the changes to validate(), even the original tests will only work on a new
> kernel.  I'll rework the patch set, so at least the original tests will continue
> to work.

+1, thank you!

Kind regards,
Petr

> Mimi

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it,
	Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/4] ima_violations.sh: Update validate() to support multiple violations
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 18:43:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304174342.GA97130@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54cf5311ec5e0debd6dfd63669e8d01883c0ba23.camel@linux.ibm.com>

> On Tue, 2025-03-04 at 09:44 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-03-04 at 14:31 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > Hi Mimi,

> > > > Add support for the number of expected violations.  Include the
> > > > expected number of violations in the output.

> > > Unfortunately this works only on fixed kernel (e.g. the one with v1 of your
> > > "ima: limit both open-writers and ToMToU violations" kernel patchset [1]
> > > (I haven't built v2 [2], but it's really just
> > > s/IMA_LIMIT_VIOLATIONS/IMA_EMITTED_OPENWRITERS/ => it will work)

> > > Testing on any other kernel it fails on first testing after reboot:

> > Hi Petr,

> > I only tested by specifying the "ima_policy=tcb" on the boot command line.  This
> > failure happens when loading the test specific policy rules.  If setup() is
> > called before loading the test specific policy rules, forcing the $LOG file
> > violation at setup() would be too early.

> Sorry, that doesn't seem to be the case.

> With the changes to validate(), even the original tests will only work on a new
> kernel.  I'll rework the patch set, so at least the original tests will continue
> to work.

+1, thank you!

Kind regards,
Petr

> Mimi

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-04 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04 11:53 [PATCH v2 1/4] ima_violations.sh: force $LOG ToMToU violation earlier Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 11:53 ` [LTP] " Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ima_violations.sh: Update validate() to support multiple violations Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 11:53   ` [LTP] " Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 13:31   ` Petr Vorel
2025-03-04 13:31     ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2025-03-04 14:44     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 14:44       ` [LTP] " Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 14:59       ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 14:59         ` [LTP] " Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 17:43         ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2025-03-04 17:43           ` Petr Vorel
2025-03-04 21:33           ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 21:33             ` [LTP] " Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ima_violations.sh: additional open-writer violation tests Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 11:53   ` [LTP] " Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 11:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ima_violations.sh: additional ToMToU " Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 11:53   ` [LTP] " Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ima_violations.sh: force $LOG ToMToU violation earlier Petr Vorel
2025-03-04 12:57   ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel
2025-03-04 13:06   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 13:06     ` [LTP] " Mimi Zohar
2025-03-04 13:34     ` Petr Vorel
2025-03-04 13:34       ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250304174342.GA97130@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.