From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Sapkal, Swapnil" <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
WangYuli <wangyuli@uniontech.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Shenoy, Gautham Ranjal" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com, Ananth.narayan@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pipe_read: don't wake up the writer if the pipe is still full
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 23:11:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250304221138.GG5756@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgvyahW4QemhmD_xD9DVTzkPnhTNid7m2jgwJvjKL+u5g@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/04, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 02:55, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > + * Really only alpha needs 32-bit fields, but
> > > + * might as well do it for 64-bit architectures
> > > + * since that's what we've historically done,
> > > + * and it makes 'head_tail' always be a simple
> > > + * 'unsigned long'.
> > > + */
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> > > + typedef unsigned int pipe_index_t;
> > > +#else
> > > + typedef unsigned short pipe_index_t;
> > > +#endif
> >
> > I am just curious, why we can't use "unsigned short" unconditionally
> > and avoid #ifdef ?
> >
> > Is "unsigned int" more efficient on 64-bit?
>
> The main reason is that a "unsigned short" write on alpha isn't atomic
Yes, I have already realized this when I tried to actually read the
comment, see my next email in reply to myself.
But thanks for your detailed explanation!
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-02 14:07 [PATCH] pipe_read: don't wake up the writer if the pipe is still full Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-02 16:20 ` WangYuli
2025-01-02 16:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-04 8:42 ` Christian Brauner
2025-01-31 9:49 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-01-31 13:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-31 20:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-02 17:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-02 18:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-02 19:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-04 11:17 ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-03 9:05 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-02-04 13:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-24 9:26 ` Sapkal, Swapnil
2025-02-24 14:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-24 18:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-25 14:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-25 11:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-26 5:55 ` Sapkal, Swapnil
2025-02-26 11:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-26 17:56 ` Sapkal, Swapnil
2025-02-26 18:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-03 13:00 ` Alexey Gladkov
2025-03-03 15:46 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-03 17:18 ` Alexey Gladkov
2025-02-26 13:18 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-26 13:21 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-26 17:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-27 16:18 ` Sapkal, Swapnil
2025-02-27 16:34 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-27 21:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-28 5:58 ` Sapkal, Swapnil
2025-02-28 14:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-28 16:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-03 9:46 ` Sapkal, Swapnil
2025-03-03 14:37 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-03 14:51 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-03 15:31 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-03 17:54 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-03 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-03 18:33 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-03 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-03 19:06 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-03 20:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-03 20:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-04 5:31 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-04 6:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-04 12:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-04 13:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-04 18:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-04 22:11 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-03-05 4:40 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-05 4:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-04 13:51 ` [PATCH] fs/pipe: Read pipe->{head,tail} atomically outside pipe->mutex K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-04 18:36 ` Alexey Gladkov
2025-03-04 19:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-05 15:31 ` [PATCH] pipe_read: don't wake up the writer if the pipe is still full Rasmus Villemoes
2025-03-05 16:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-06 9:48 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-03-06 14:42 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-03-05 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-06 8:35 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-03-06 17:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-06 9:28 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-03-06 11:39 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] pipe: Convert pipe->{head,tail} to unsigned short K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-06 11:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] fs/pipe: Limit the slots in pipe_resize_ring() K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-06 12:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-06 15:26 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-06 11:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs/splice: Atomically read pipe->{head,tail} in opipe_prep() K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-06 11:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] treewide: pipe: Convert all references to pipe->{head,tail,max_usage,ring_size} to unsigned short K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-06 12:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-06 12:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-06 15:33 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-06 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-06 14:27 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-03-03 18:32 ` [PATCH] pipe_read: don't wake up the writer if the pipe is still full K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-04 5:22 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-03 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-04 5:06 ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-04 5:35 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-04 10:29 ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-04 12:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-04 23:35 ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-04 23:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-05 4:56 ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-05 11:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-05 22:46 ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-06 9:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-07 6:08 ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-07 6:24 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-07 10:46 ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-07 11:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-07 12:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-07 23:56 ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-09 14:01 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-09 17:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-10 10:49 ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-10 11:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-10 11:37 ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-10 12:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-10 23:33 ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-11 0:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-11 6:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <20250311112922.3342-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-11 11:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-07 11:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-27 12:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-27 13:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-27 15:59 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-27 16:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250304221138.GG5756@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=Ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wangyuli@uniontech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.