From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] arm64/mm: Refactor __set_ptes() and __ptep_get_and_clear()
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 13:08:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202503061237.QurSXHSC-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304150444.3788920-5-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Hi Ryan,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v6.14-rc5 next-20250305]
[cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core akpm-mm/mm-everything arm-perf/for-next/perf]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ryan-Roberts/arm64-hugetlb-Cleanup-huge_pte-size-discovery-mechanisms/20250304-230647
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250304150444.3788920-5-ryan.roberts%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 04/11] arm64/mm: Refactor __set_ptes() and __ptep_get_and_clear()
config: arm64-randconfig-001-20250305 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250306/202503061237.QurSXHSC-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250306/202503061237.QurSXHSC-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503061237.QurSXHSC-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
In file included from include/linux/ftrace.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/trace_recursion.h:5:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/pgtable.h:6:
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:639:7: error: duplicate case value '536870912'
case PUD_SIZE:
^
include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopud.h:20:20: note: expanded from macro 'PUD_SIZE'
#define PUD_SIZE (1UL << PUD_SHIFT)
^
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:636:7: note: previous case defined here
case PMD_SIZE:
^
include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h:22:20: note: expanded from macro 'PMD_SIZE'
#define PMD_SIZE (1UL << PMD_SHIFT)
^
In file included from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
In file included from include/linux/ftrace.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/trace_recursion.h:5:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/pgtable.h:6:
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:1303:7: error: duplicate case value '536870912'
case PUD_SIZE:
^
include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopud.h:20:20: note: expanded from macro 'PUD_SIZE'
#define PUD_SIZE (1UL << PUD_SHIFT)
^
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:1300:7: note: previous case defined here
case PMD_SIZE:
^
include/asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h:22:20: note: expanded from macro 'PMD_SIZE'
#define PMD_SIZE (1UL << PMD_SHIFT)
^
2 errors generated.
make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:102: arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1 shuffle=4064171735
make[3]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
make[2]: *** [Makefile:1264: prepare0] Error 2 shuffle=4064171735
make[2]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: *** [Makefile:251: __sub-make] Error 2 shuffle=4064171735
make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
make: *** [Makefile:251: __sub-make] Error 2 shuffle=4064171735
make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
vim +/536870912 +639 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
626
627 static inline void set_ptes_anysz(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte,
628 unsigned int nr, unsigned long pgsize)
629 {
630 unsigned long stride = pgsize >> PAGE_SHIFT;
631
632 switch (pgsize) {
633 case PAGE_SIZE:
634 page_table_check_ptes_set(mm, ptep, pte, nr);
635 break;
636 case PMD_SIZE:
637 page_table_check_pmds_set(mm, (pmd_t *)ptep, pte_pmd(pte), nr);
638 break;
> 639 case PUD_SIZE:
640 page_table_check_puds_set(mm, (pud_t *)ptep, pte_pud(pte), nr);
641 break;
642 default:
643 VM_WARN_ON(1);
644 }
645
646 __sync_cache_and_tags(pte, nr * stride);
647
648 for (;;) {
649 __check_safe_pte_update(mm, ptep, pte);
650 __set_pte(ptep, pte);
651 if (--nr == 0)
652 break;
653 ptep++;
654 pte = pte_advance_pfn(pte, stride);
655 }
656 }
657
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 15:04 [PATCH v3 00/11] Perf improvements for hugetlb and vmalloc on arm64 Ryan Roberts
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] arm64: hugetlb: Cleanup huge_pte size discovery mechanisms Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-04 3:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] arm64: hugetlb: Refine tlb maintenance scope Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-04 3:50 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] mm/page_table_check: Batch-check pmds/puds just like ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-03-26 14:48 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-03-26 14:54 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] arm64/mm: Refactor __set_ptes() and __ptep_get_and_clear() Ryan Roberts
2025-03-06 5:08 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-03-06 11:54 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-14 16:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] arm64: hugetlb: Use set_ptes_anysz() and ptep_get_and_clear_anysz() Ryan Roberts
2025-03-05 16:00 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-05 16:32 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] arm64/mm: Hoist barriers out of set_ptes_anysz() loop Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-04 4:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] mm/vmalloc: Warn on improper use of vunmap_range() Ryan Roberts
2025-03-27 13:05 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] mm/vmalloc: Gracefully unmap huge ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] arm64/mm: Support huge pte-mapped pages in vmap Ryan Roberts
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] mm/vmalloc: Enter lazy mmu mode while manipulating vmalloc ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-03-27 13:06 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-03 20:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-04 4:54 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] arm64/mm: Batch barriers when updating kernel mappings Ryan Roberts
2025-04-04 6:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-14 17:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-14 18:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-15 10:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-15 17:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-27 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Perf improvements for hugetlb and vmalloc on arm64 Uladzislau Rezki
2025-03-27 13:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-14 13:56 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202503061237.QurSXHSC-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.