From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] mm/page_table_check: Batch-check pmds/puds just like ptes
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 21:46:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-7zo5ahsqLaKxUX@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304150444.3788920-4-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:04:33PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> Convert page_table_check_p[mu]d_set(...) to
> page_table_check_p[mu]ds_set(..., nr) to allow checking a contiguous set
> of pmds/puds in single batch. We retain page_table_check_p[mu]d_set(...)
> as macros that call new batch functions with nr=1 for compatibility.
>
> arm64 is about to reorganise its pte/pmd/pud helpers to reuse more code
> and to allow the implementation for huge_pte to more efficiently set
> ptes/pmds/puds in batches. We need these batch-helpers to make the
> refactoring possible.
>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-03 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 15:04 [PATCH v3 00/11] Perf improvements for hugetlb and vmalloc on arm64 Ryan Roberts
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] arm64: hugetlb: Cleanup huge_pte size discovery mechanisms Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-04 3:03 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] arm64: hugetlb: Refine tlb maintenance scope Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-04 3:50 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] mm/page_table_check: Batch-check pmds/puds just like ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-03-26 14:48 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-03-26 14:54 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:46 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] arm64/mm: Refactor __set_ptes() and __ptep_get_and_clear() Ryan Roberts
2025-03-06 5:08 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-06 11:54 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-14 16:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] arm64: hugetlb: Use set_ptes_anysz() and ptep_get_and_clear_anysz() Ryan Roberts
2025-03-05 16:00 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-05 16:32 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] arm64/mm: Hoist barriers out of set_ptes_anysz() loop Ryan Roberts
2025-04-03 20:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-04 4:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] mm/vmalloc: Warn on improper use of vunmap_range() Ryan Roberts
2025-03-27 13:05 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] mm/vmalloc: Gracefully unmap huge ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] arm64/mm: Support huge pte-mapped pages in vmap Ryan Roberts
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] mm/vmalloc: Enter lazy mmu mode while manipulating vmalloc ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-03-27 13:06 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-04-03 20:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-04 4:54 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-03-04 15:04 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] arm64/mm: Batch barriers when updating kernel mappings Ryan Roberts
2025-04-04 6:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-14 17:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-14 18:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-15 10:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-04-15 17:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-27 12:16 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Perf improvements for hugetlb and vmalloc on arm64 Uladzislau Rezki
2025-03-27 13:46 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-14 13:56 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-7zo5ahsqLaKxUX@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.