* [OE-core][PATCH] lib: spdx30_tasks: Handle patched CVEs
@ 2025-03-06 21:20 Joshua Watt
2025-03-11 13:01 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Watt @ 2025-03-06 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-core; +Cc: Joshua Watt
The code to iterate over patched CVEs (e.g. those patched by a .patch
file in SRC_URI) was accidentally omitted when writing the SPDX 3
handling. Add it in now
[YOCTO #15789]
Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
---
meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py b/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
index e3e5dbc7427..e20bb0c86f3 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
@@ -498,6 +498,16 @@ def create_spdx(d):
# Add CVEs
cve_by_status = {}
if include_vex != "none":
+ for cve in oe.cve_check.get_patched_cves(d):
+ spdx_cve = build_objset.new_cve_vuln(cve)
+ build_objset.set_element_alias(spdx_cve)
+
+ cve_by_status.setdefault("Patched", {})[cve] = (
+ spdx_cve,
+ "patched",
+ "",
+ )
+
for cve in d.getVarFlags("CVE_STATUS") or {}:
decoded_status = oe.cve_check.decode_cve_status(d, cve)
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [OE-core][PATCH] lib: spdx30_tasks: Handle patched CVEs
2025-03-06 21:20 [OE-core][PATCH] lib: spdx30_tasks: Handle patched CVEs Joshua Watt
@ 2025-03-11 13:01 ` Richard Purdie
2025-03-11 13:17 ` Joshua Watt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2025-03-11 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: JPEWhacker, openembedded-core; +Cc: Ross Burton
On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 14:20 -0700, Joshua Watt via
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> The code to iterate over patched CVEs (e.g. those patched by a .patch
> file in SRC_URI) was accidentally omitted when writing the SPDX 3
> handling. Add it in now
>
> [YOCTO #15789]
>
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
> b/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
> index e3e5dbc7427..e20bb0c86f3 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
> @@ -498,6 +498,16 @@ def create_spdx(d):
> # Add CVEs
> cve_by_status = {}
> if include_vex != "none":
> + for cve in oe.cve_check.get_patched_cves(d):
> + spdx_cve = build_objset.new_cve_vuln(cve)
> + build_objset.set_element_alias(spdx_cve)
> +
> + cve_by_status.setdefault("Patched", {})[cve] = (
> + spdx_cve,
> + "patched",
> + "",
> + )
> +
> for cve in d.getVarFlags("CVE_STATUS") or {}:
> decoded_status = oe.cve_check.decode_cve_status(d, cve)
>
I worry this has increased the build time by around 10 mins (~25%):
https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/non-release/20250311-54/testresults/buildperf-alma8/perf-alma8-vk_master_20250311090119_046a92d351.html
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [OE-core][PATCH] lib: spdx30_tasks: Handle patched CVEs
2025-03-11 13:01 ` Richard Purdie
@ 2025-03-11 13:17 ` Joshua Watt
2025-03-11 13:46 ` Mikko Rapeli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Watt @ 2025-03-11 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: OE-core, Ross Burton
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1693 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025, 7:01 AM Richard Purdie <
richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 14:20 -0700, Joshua Watt via
> lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > The code to iterate over patched CVEs (e.g. those patched by a .patch
> > file in SRC_URI) was accidentally omitted when writing the SPDX 3
> > handling. Add it in now
> >
> > [YOCTO #15789]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
> > b/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
> > index e3e5dbc7427..e20bb0c86f3 100644
> > --- a/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
> > +++ b/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
> > @@ -498,6 +498,16 @@ def create_spdx(d):
> > # Add CVEs
> > cve_by_status = {}
> > if include_vex != "none":
> > + for cve in oe.cve_check.get_patched_cves(d):
> > + spdx_cve = build_objset.new_cve_vuln(cve)
> > + build_objset.set_element_alias(spdx_cve)
> > +
> > + cve_by_status.setdefault("Patched", {})[cve] = (
> > + spdx_cve,
> > + "patched",
> > + "",
> > + )
> > +
> > for cve in d.getVarFlags("CVE_STATUS") or {}:
> > decoded_status = oe.cve_check.decode_cve_status(d, cve)
> >
>
> I worry this has increased the build time by around 10 mins (~25%):
>
>
> https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/non-release/20250311-54/testresults/buildperf-alma8/perf-alma8-vk_master_20250311090119_046a92d351.html
Ok. Let me see what I can do about that
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2967 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [OE-core][PATCH] lib: spdx30_tasks: Handle patched CVEs
2025-03-11 13:17 ` Joshua Watt
@ 2025-03-11 13:46 ` Mikko Rapeli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mikko Rapeli @ 2025-03-11 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: JPEWhacker; +Cc: Richard Purdie, OE-core, Ross Burton
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 07:17:33AM -0600, Joshua Watt via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025, 7:01 AM Richard Purdie <
> richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 14:20 -0700, Joshua Watt via
> > lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > > The code to iterate over patched CVEs (e.g. those patched by a .patch
> > > file in SRC_URI) was accidentally omitted when writing the SPDX 3
> > > handling. Add it in now
> > >
> > > [YOCTO #15789]
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py | 10 ++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
> > > b/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
> > > index e3e5dbc7427..e20bb0c86f3 100644
> > > --- a/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
> > > +++ b/meta/lib/oe/spdx30_tasks.py
> > > @@ -498,6 +498,16 @@ def create_spdx(d):
> > > # Add CVEs
> > > cve_by_status = {}
> > > if include_vex != "none":
> > > + for cve in oe.cve_check.get_patched_cves(d):
> > > + spdx_cve = build_objset.new_cve_vuln(cve)
> > > + build_objset.set_element_alias(spdx_cve)
> > > +
> > > + cve_by_status.setdefault("Patched", {})[cve] = (
> > > + spdx_cve,
> > > + "patched",
> > > + "",
> > > + )
> > > +
> > > for cve in d.getVarFlags("CVE_STATUS") or {}:
> > > decoded_status = oe.cve_check.decode_cve_status(d, cve)
> > >
> >
> > I worry this has increased the build time by around 10 mins (~25%):
> >
> >
> > https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/non-release/20250311-54/testresults/buildperf-alma8/perf-alma8-vk_master_20250311090119_046a92d351.html
>
>
> Ok. Let me see what I can do about that
Yes please. I think the kernel build time increase from ~4 minutes to ~16 minutes is
what I saw in my local builds. Both kernel and image builds are affected by these
SDPX CVE data changes, as we discussed yesterday on #yocto irc.
Cheers,
-Mikko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-11 13:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-06 21:20 [OE-core][PATCH] lib: spdx30_tasks: Handle patched CVEs Joshua Watt
2025-03-11 13:01 ` Richard Purdie
2025-03-11 13:17 ` Joshua Watt
2025-03-11 13:46 ` Mikko Rapeli
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.