* + kunit-add-test-cases-for-backtrace-warning-suppression.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch
@ 2025-03-13 22:05 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2025-03-13 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, ysato, will, ville.syrjala, tzimmermann, tglx, rmoar,
paul.walmsley, palmer, naresh.kamboju, mripard, mpe, mingo,
mcanal, maarten.lankhorst, lkft, keescook, jani.nikula, horms,
hca, gor, glaubitz, deller, davidgow, dave.hansen, daniel,
daniel.diaz, dan.carpenter, dalias, chenhuacai, charlie,
catalin.marinas, brendan.higgins, bp, arthurgrillo, arnd, aou,
airlied, agordeev, acarmina, linux, akpm
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8821 bytes --]
The patch titled
Subject: kunit: add test cases for backtrace warning suppression
has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch. Its filename is
kunit-add-test-cases-for-backtrace-warning-suppression.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/kunit-add-test-cases-for-backtrace-warning-suppression.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: kunit: add test cases for backtrace warning suppression
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:43:18 +0000
Add unit tests to verify that warning backtrace suppression works.
If backtrace suppression does _not_ work, the unit tests will likely
trigger unsuppressed backtraces, which should actually help to get the
affected architectures / platforms fixed.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250313114329.284104-4-acarmina@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@riseup.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Daniel Diaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maíra Canal <mcanal@igalia.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Zimemrmann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
lib/kunit/Makefile | 7 +
lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c a/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c
new file mode 100644
--- /dev/null
+++ a/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test for suppressing warning tracebacks
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024, Guenter Roeck
+ * Author: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct);
+
+ KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct);
+ WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed");
+ KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct), 1);
+}
+
+static void trigger_backtrace_warn(void)
+{
+ WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed");
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_indirect(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+
+ KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+ trigger_backtrace_warn();
+ KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(trigger_backtrace_warn), 1);
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+ DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi);
+
+ KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi);
+ KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+ WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed");
+ trigger_backtrace_warn();
+ KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn);
+ KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi), 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(trigger_backtrace_warn), 1);
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct);
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KALLSYMS))
+ kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE or CONFIG_KALLSYMS");
+
+ KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct);
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+ SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct), 1);
+}
+
+static void trigger_backtrace_warn_on(void)
+{
+ WARN_ON(1);
+}
+
+static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_indirect(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn_on);
+
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE))
+ kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE");
+
+ KUNIT_START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn_on);
+ trigger_backtrace_warn_on();
+ KUNIT_END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(trigger_backtrace_warn_on);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(trigger_backtrace_warn_on), 1);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case backtrace_suppression_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct),
+ KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_indirect),
+ KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi),
+ KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct),
+ KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_indirect),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite backtrace_suppression_test_suite = {
+ .name = "backtrace-suppression-test",
+ .test_cases = backtrace_suppression_test_cases,
+};
+kunit_test_suites(&backtrace_suppression_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--- a/lib/kunit/Makefile~kunit-add-test-cases-for-backtrace-warning-suppression
+++ a/lib/kunit/Makefile
@@ -18,11 +18,14 @@ endif
# KUnit 'hooks' and bug handling are built-in even when KUnit is built
# as a module.
-obj-y += hooks.o \
- bug.o
+obj-y += hooks.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE) += bug.o
obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += kunit-test.o
obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += platform-test.o
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT_SUPPRESS_BACKTRACE),y)
+obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST) += backtrace-suppression-test.o
+endif
# string-stream-test compiles built-in only.
ifeq ($(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST),y)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from linux@roeck-us.net are
bug-kunit-core-support-for-suppressing-warning-backtraces.patch
kunit-bug-count-suppressed-warning-backtraces.patch
kunit-add-test-cases-for-backtrace-warning-suppression.patch
kunit-add-documentation-for-warning-backtrace-suppression-api.patch
drm-suppress-intentional-warning-backtraces-in-scaling-unit-tests.patch
x86-add-support-for-suppressing-warning-backtraces.patch
arm64-add-support-for-suppressing-warning-backtraces.patch
loongarch-add-support-for-suppressing-warning-backtraces.patch
parisc-add-support-for-suppressing-warning-backtraces.patch
s390-add-support-for-suppressing-warning-backtraces.patch
sh-add-support-for-suppressing-warning-backtraces.patch
sh-move-defines-needed-for-suppressing-warning-backtraces.patch
riscv-add-support-for-suppressing-warning-backtraces.patch
powerpc-add-support-for-suppressing-warning-backtraces.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-03-13 22:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-13 22:05 + kunit-add-test-cases-for-backtrace-warning-suppression.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch Andrew Morton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.