From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: broonie@kernel.org,catalin.marinas@arm.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,james.clark@linaro.org,joey.gouly@arm.com,kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,maz@kernel.org,oliver.upton@linux.dev,suzuki.poulose@arm.com,tabba@google.com,will@kernel.org
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:09:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025031328-creature-hardship-32f5@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250312-stable-sve-6-13-v1-1-c7ba07a6f4f7@kernel.org>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps
to the 6.13-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
kvm-arm64-calculate-cptr_el2-traps-on-activating-traps.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.13 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From stable+bounces-124192-greg=kroah.com@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 13 00:49:47 2025
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 23:49:09 +0000
Subject: KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20250312-stable-sve-6-13-v1-1-c7ba07a6f4f7@kernel.org>
From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
[ Upstream commit 2fd5b4b0e7b440602455b79977bfa64dea101e6c ]
Similar to VHE, calculate the value of cptr_el2 from scratch on
activate traps. This removes the need to store cptr_el2 in every
vcpu structure. Moreover, some traps, such as whether the guest
owns the fp registers, need to be set on every vcpu run.
Reported-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Fixes: 5294afdbf45a ("KVM: arm64: Exclude FP ownership from kvm_vcpu_arch")
Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241216105057.579031-13-tabba@google.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 1
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c | 30 ----------------------
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -708,7 +708,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
u64 hcr_el2;
u64 hcrx_el2;
u64 mdcr_el2;
- u64 cptr_el2;
/* Exception Information */
struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info fault;
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -1569,7 +1569,6 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init
}
vcpu_reset_hcr(vcpu);
- vcpu->arch.cptr_el2 = kvm_get_reset_cptr_el2(vcpu);
/*
* Handle the "start in power-off" case.
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
@@ -31,8 +31,6 @@ static void pvm_init_traps_aa64pfr0(stru
const u64 feature_ids = pvm_read_id_reg(vcpu, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
u64 hcr_set = HCR_RW;
u64 hcr_clear = 0;
- u64 cptr_set = 0;
- u64 cptr_clear = 0;
/* Protected KVM does not support AArch32 guests. */
BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_EL0),
@@ -62,21 +60,10 @@ static void pvm_init_traps_aa64pfr0(stru
/* Trap AMU */
if (!FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_AMU), feature_ids)) {
hcr_clear |= HCR_AMVOFFEN;
- cptr_set |= CPTR_EL2_TAM;
- }
-
- /* Trap SVE */
- if (!FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_SVE), feature_ids)) {
- if (has_hvhe())
- cptr_clear |= CPACR_ELx_ZEN;
- else
- cptr_set |= CPTR_EL2_TZ;
}
vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 |= hcr_set;
vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 &= ~hcr_clear;
- vcpu->arch.cptr_el2 |= cptr_set;
- vcpu->arch.cptr_el2 &= ~cptr_clear;
}
/*
@@ -106,7 +93,6 @@ static void pvm_init_traps_aa64dfr0(stru
const u64 feature_ids = pvm_read_id_reg(vcpu, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
u64 mdcr_set = 0;
u64 mdcr_clear = 0;
- u64 cptr_set = 0;
/* Trap/constrain PMU */
if (!FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), feature_ids)) {
@@ -133,21 +119,12 @@ static void pvm_init_traps_aa64dfr0(stru
if (!FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_TraceFilt), feature_ids))
mdcr_set |= MDCR_EL2_TTRF;
- /* Trap Trace */
- if (!FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_TraceVer), feature_ids)) {
- if (has_hvhe())
- cptr_set |= CPACR_EL1_TTA;
- else
- cptr_set |= CPTR_EL2_TTA;
- }
-
/* Trap External Trace */
if (!FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_ExtTrcBuff), feature_ids))
mdcr_clear |= MDCR_EL2_E2TB_MASK;
vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 |= mdcr_set;
vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 &= ~mdcr_clear;
- vcpu->arch.cptr_el2 |= cptr_set;
}
/*
@@ -198,10 +175,6 @@ static void pvm_init_trap_regs(struct kv
/* Clear res0 and set res1 bits to trap potential new features. */
vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 &= ~(HCR_RES0);
vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 &= ~(MDCR_EL2_RES0);
- if (!has_hvhe()) {
- vcpu->arch.cptr_el2 |= CPTR_NVHE_EL2_RES1;
- vcpu->arch.cptr_el2 &= ~(CPTR_NVHE_EL2_RES0);
- }
}
static void pkvm_vcpu_reset_hcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -236,7 +209,6 @@ static void pkvm_vcpu_reset_hcr(struct k
*/
static void pkvm_vcpu_init_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- vcpu->arch.cptr_el2 = kvm_get_reset_cptr_el2(vcpu);
vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 = 0;
pkvm_vcpu_reset_hcr(vcpu);
@@ -693,8 +665,6 @@ unlock:
return ret;
}
- hyp_vcpu->vcpu.arch.cptr_el2 = kvm_get_reset_cptr_el2(&hyp_vcpu->vcpu);
-
return 0;
}
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
@@ -36,33 +36,46 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, kvm_hyp_ve
extern void kvm_nvhe_prepare_backtrace(unsigned long fp, unsigned long pc);
-static void __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void __activate_cptr_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- u64 val;
+ u64 val = CPTR_EL2_TAM; /* Same bit irrespective of E2H */
- ___activate_traps(vcpu, vcpu->arch.hcr_el2);
- __activate_traps_common(vcpu);
+ if (has_hvhe()) {
+ val |= CPACR_ELx_TTA;
- val = vcpu->arch.cptr_el2;
- val |= CPTR_EL2_TAM; /* Same bit irrespective of E2H */
- val |= has_hvhe() ? CPACR_EL1_TTA : CPTR_EL2_TTA;
- if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_SME)) {
- if (has_hvhe())
- val &= ~CPACR_ELx_SMEN;
- else
- val |= CPTR_EL2_TSM;
- }
+ if (guest_owns_fp_regs()) {
+ val |= CPACR_ELx_FPEN;
+ if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
+ val |= CPACR_ELx_ZEN;
+ }
+ } else {
+ val |= CPTR_EL2_TTA | CPTR_NVHE_EL2_RES1;
+
+ /*
+ * Always trap SME since it's not supported in KVM.
+ * TSM is RES1 if SME isn't implemented.
+ */
+ val |= CPTR_EL2_TSM;
- if (!guest_owns_fp_regs()) {
- if (has_hvhe())
- val &= ~(CPACR_ELx_FPEN | CPACR_ELx_ZEN);
- else
- val |= CPTR_EL2_TFP | CPTR_EL2_TZ;
+ if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) || !guest_owns_fp_regs())
+ val |= CPTR_EL2_TZ;
- __activate_traps_fpsimd32(vcpu);
+ if (!guest_owns_fp_regs())
+ val |= CPTR_EL2_TFP;
}
+ if (!guest_owns_fp_regs())
+ __activate_traps_fpsimd32(vcpu);
+
kvm_write_cptr_el2(val);
+}
+
+static void __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ ___activate_traps(vcpu, vcpu->arch.hcr_el2);
+ __activate_traps_common(vcpu);
+ __activate_cptr_traps(vcpu);
+
write_sysreg(__this_cpu_read(kvm_hyp_vector), vbar_el2);
if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT)) {
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from broonie@kernel.org are
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-remove-host-fpsimd-saving-for-non-protected-kvm.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-mark-some-header-functions-as-inline.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-eagerly-switch-zcr_el-1-2.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-unconditionally-save-flush-host-fpsimd-sve-sme-state.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-refactor-exit-handlers.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-remove-vhe-host-restore-of-cpacr_el1.zen.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-remove-vhe-host-restore-of-cpacr_el1.smen.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-calculate-cptr_el2-traps-on-activating-traps.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-13 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-12 23:49 [PATCH 6.13 0/8] KVM: arm64: Backport of SVE fixes to v6.13 Mark Brown
2025-03-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 6.13 1/8] KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps Mark Brown
2025-03-13 12:31 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-13 16:09 ` gregkh [this message]
2025-03-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 6.13 2/8] KVM: arm64: Unconditionally save+flush host FPSIMD/SVE/SME state Mark Brown
2025-03-13 12:31 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-13 16:09 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Unconditionally save+flush host FPSIMD/SVE/SME state" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 6.13 3/8] KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM Mark Brown
2025-03-13 12:31 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-13 16:09 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 6.13 4/8] KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN Mark Brown
2025-03-13 12:31 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-13 16:09 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 6.13 5/8] KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.SMEN Mark Brown
2025-03-13 12:31 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-13 16:09 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.SMEN" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 6.13 6/8] KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers Mark Brown
2025-03-13 12:31 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-13 16:09 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 6.13 7/8] KVM: arm64: Mark some header functions as inline Mark Brown
2025-03-13 12:31 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-13 16:09 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Mark some header functions as inline" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-12 23:49 ` [PATCH 6.13 8/8] KVM: arm64: Eagerly switch ZCR_EL{1,2} Mark Brown
2025-03-13 12:31 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-13 16:09 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Eagerly switch ZCR_EL{1,2}" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-19 10:29 ` [PATCH 6.13 8/8] KVM: arm64: Eagerly switch ZCR_EL{1,2} Mark Rutland
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-21 0:10 [PATCH 6.13 v2 1/8] KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps Mark Brown
2025-03-24 18:56 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025031328-creature-hardship-32f5@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.