[merged mm-stable] zsmalloc-rename-pool-lock.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged mm-stable] zsmalloc-rename-pool-lock.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: zsmalloc: rename pool lock
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     zsmalloc-rename-pool-lock.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: zsmalloc: rename pool lock
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:03:21 +0900

The old name comes from the times when the pool did not have compaction
(defragmentation).  Rename it to ->lock because these days it synchronizes
not only migration.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250303022425.285971-13-senozhatsky@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/zsmalloc.c |   38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c~zsmalloc-rename-pool-lock
+++ a/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 /*
  * lock ordering:
  *	page_lock
- *	pool->migrate_lock
+ *	pool->lock
  *	class->lock
  *	zspage->lock
  */
@@ -223,8 +223,8 @@ struct zs_pool {
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
 	struct work_struct free_work;
 #endif
-	/* protect page/zspage migration */
-	rwlock_t migrate_lock;
+	/* protect zspage migration/compaction */
+	rwlock_t lock;
 	atomic_t compaction_in_progress;
 };
 
@@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@ void *zs_map_object(struct zs_pool *pool
 	BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
 
 	/* It guarantees it can get zspage from handle safely */
-	read_lock(&pool->migrate_lock);
+	read_lock(&pool->lock);
 	obj = handle_to_obj(handle);
 	obj_to_location(obj, &zpdesc, &obj_idx);
 	zspage = get_zspage(zpdesc);
@@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ void *zs_map_object(struct zs_pool *pool
 	 * which is smaller granularity.
 	 */
 	migrate_read_lock(zspage);
-	read_unlock(&pool->migrate_lock);
+	read_unlock(&pool->lock);
 
 	class = zspage_class(pool, zspage);
 	off = offset_in_page(class->size * obj_idx);
@@ -1450,16 +1450,16 @@ void zs_free(struct zs_pool *pool, unsig
 		return;
 
 	/*
-	 * The pool->migrate_lock protects the race with zpage's migration
+	 * The pool->lock protects the race with zpage's migration
 	 * so it's safe to get the page from handle.
 	 */
-	read_lock(&pool->migrate_lock);
+	read_lock(&pool->lock);
 	obj = handle_to_obj(handle);
 	obj_to_zpdesc(obj, &f_zpdesc);
 	zspage = get_zspage(f_zpdesc);
 	class = zspage_class(pool, zspage);
 	spin_lock(&class->lock);
-	read_unlock(&pool->migrate_lock);
+	read_unlock(&pool->lock);
 
 	class_stat_sub(class, ZS_OBJS_INUSE, 1);
 	obj_free(class->size, obj);
@@ -1796,7 +1796,7 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *
 	 * The pool migrate_lock protects the race between zpage migration
 	 * and zs_free.
 	 */
-	write_lock(&pool->migrate_lock);
+	write_lock(&pool->lock);
 	class = zspage_class(pool, zspage);
 
 	/*
@@ -1833,7 +1833,7 @@ static int zs_page_migrate(struct page *
 	 * Since we complete the data copy and set up new zspage structure,
 	 * it's okay to release migration_lock.
 	 */
-	write_unlock(&pool->migrate_lock);
+	write_unlock(&pool->lock);
 	spin_unlock(&class->lock);
 	migrate_write_unlock(zspage);
 
@@ -1956,7 +1956,7 @@ static unsigned long __zs_compact(struct
 	 * protect the race between zpage migration and zs_free
 	 * as well as zpage allocation/free
 	 */
-	write_lock(&pool->migrate_lock);
+	write_lock(&pool->lock);
 	spin_lock(&class->lock);
 	while (zs_can_compact(class)) {
 		int fg;
@@ -1983,14 +1983,14 @@ static unsigned long __zs_compact(struct
 		src_zspage = NULL;
 
 		if (get_fullness_group(class, dst_zspage) == ZS_INUSE_RATIO_100
-		    || rwlock_is_contended(&pool->migrate_lock)) {
+		    || rwlock_is_contended(&pool->lock)) {
 			putback_zspage(class, dst_zspage);
 			dst_zspage = NULL;
 
 			spin_unlock(&class->lock);
-			write_unlock(&pool->migrate_lock);
+			write_unlock(&pool->lock);
 			cond_resched();
-			write_lock(&pool->migrate_lock);
+			write_lock(&pool->lock);
 			spin_lock(&class->lock);
 		}
 	}
@@ -2002,7 +2002,7 @@ static unsigned long __zs_compact(struct
 		putback_zspage(class, dst_zspage);
 
 	spin_unlock(&class->lock);
-	write_unlock(&pool->migrate_lock);
+	write_unlock(&pool->lock);
 
 	return pages_freed;
 }
@@ -2014,10 +2014,10 @@ unsigned long zs_compact(struct zs_pool
 	unsigned long pages_freed = 0;
 
 	/*
-	 * Pool compaction is performed under pool->migrate_lock so it is basically
+	 * Pool compaction is performed under pool->lock so it is basically
 	 * single-threaded. Having more than one thread in __zs_compact()
-	 * will increase pool->migrate_lock contention, which will impact other
-	 * zsmalloc operations that need pool->migrate_lock.
+	 * will increase pool->lock contention, which will impact other
+	 * zsmalloc operations that need pool->lock.
 	 */
 	if (atomic_xchg(&pool->compaction_in_progress, 1))
 		return 0;
@@ -2139,7 +2139,7 @@ struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const cha
 		return NULL;
 
 	init_deferred_free(pool);
-	rwlock_init(&pool->migrate_lock);
+	rwlock_init(&pool->lock);
 	atomic_set(&pool->compaction_in_progress, 0);
 
 	pool->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from senozhatsky@chromium.org are