From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: kevin.tian@intel.com, jgg@nvidia.com
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
Lai Yi <yi1.lai@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] iommufd: Test attach before detaching pasid
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 06:34:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250328133448.22052-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com> (raw)
Check if the pasid has been attached before going further in the detach
path. This makes this path more robust. Add a selftest as well.
Reported-by: Lai Yi <yi1.lai@linux.intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/Z+X0tzxhiaupJT7b@ly-workstation/#t
Fixes: c0e301b2978d ("iommufd/device: Add pasid_attach array to track per-PASID attach")
Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c | 7 +++++++
tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
index 2307daad65c0..375dd262f431 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c
@@ -644,6 +644,11 @@ iommufd_hw_pagetable_detach(struct iommufd_device *idev, ioasid_t pasid)
mutex_lock(&igroup->lock);
attach = xa_load(&igroup->pasid_attach, pasid);
+ if (WARN_ON(!attach)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&igroup->lock);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
hwpt = attach->hwpt;
hwpt_paging = find_hwpt_paging(hwpt);
@@ -1001,6 +1006,8 @@ void iommufd_device_detach(struct iommufd_device *idev, ioasid_t pasid)
struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt;
hwpt = iommufd_hw_pagetable_detach(idev, pasid);
+ if (!hwpt)
+ return;
iommufd_hw_pagetable_put(idev->ictx, hwpt);
refcount_dec(&idev->obj.users);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c
index 7eb7ee149f2b..1a8e85afe9aa 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c
@@ -3074,6 +3074,12 @@ TEST_F(iommufd_device_pasid, pasid_attach)
uint32_t pasid = 100;
uint32_t viommu_id;
+ /*
+ * Negative, detach pasid without attaching, this is not expected.
+ * But it should not result in failure anyway.
+ */
+ test_cmd_pasid_detach(pasid);
+
/* Allocate two nested hwpts sharing one common parent hwpt */
test_cmd_hwpt_alloc(self->device_id, self->ioas_id,
IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC_NEST_PARENT,
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-28 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-28 13:34 Yi Liu [this message]
2025-03-28 14:40 ` [PATCH] iommufd: Test attach before detaching pasid Jason Gunthorpe
2025-03-31 2:24 ` Yi Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250328133448.22052-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=yi1.lai@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.