All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+62262fdc0e01d99573fc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, jlayton@kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netfs@lists.linux.dev, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"Sapkal, Swapnil" <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
	Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] INFO: task hung in netfs_unbuffered_write_iter
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 20:01:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250328190105.GG29527@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86991.1743185694@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

David,

I know that I will regret my email tomorrow, but

On 03/28, David Howells wrote:
>
> #syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git netfs-fixes
>
>   There's inconsistency with some wakeups between using rreq->waitq (a private
>   waitqueue) and using clear_and_wake_up_bit() (a shared global waitqueue).

Too late for me, I didn't even try to read the "netfs-fixes" changes.
And if I even tried, I probably wouldn't understand them ;)

But, afaics (I can be easily wrong), the curent logic in net/9p/ doesn't look
right regardless of any other fixes, no?

Oleg.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-28 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-22 15:54 [syzbot] [netfs?] INFO: task hung in netfs_unbuffered_write_iter syzbot
2025-03-23 18:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 19:17   ` syzbot
2025-03-23 19:47     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 19:50       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-23 19:52       ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-23 21:02         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-24 10:47           ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 11:15             ` syzbot
2025-03-24 13:17             ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-24 13:19               ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 14:52                 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 16:03                   ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-24 16:25                     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 16:36                       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-25  2:52                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-25 12:15                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-25 12:36                       ` Dominique Martinet
2025-03-25 13:04                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-25 14:49                         ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-25 14:58                           ` Dominique Martinet
2025-03-26 12:19                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-26 12:44                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-26 13:05                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-27 17:46                             ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-27 21:19                               ` syzbot
2025-03-27 22:18                                 ` asmadeus
2025-03-28  4:01                                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-28  4:43                                     ` syzbot
2025-03-28 13:06                                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 13:07                                       ` syzbot
2025-03-28 13:25                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 13:49                                           ` syzbot
2025-03-28 14:49                                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 15:22                                               ` syzbot
2025-03-28 17:00                                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 17:56                                                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-28 18:20                                                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-29  0:00                                                   ` asmadeus
2025-03-29 14:21                                                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-29 23:27                                                       ` asmadeus
2025-03-30 10:21                                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 20:03     ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-23 20:43       ` syzbot
2025-03-28 18:14   ` David Howells
2025-03-28 18:44     ` syzbot
2025-03-28 19:01     ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-03-24 12:49 ` Edward Adam Davis
2025-03-24 13:37   ` syzbot
2025-08-03 12:09 ` syzbot
     [not found] <20250323002028.3563-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-23  1:15 ` syzbot
     [not found] <20250323021219.3580-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-23  2:48 ` syzbot
     [not found] <20250324111613.3620-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-24 11:34 ` syzbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250328190105.GG29527@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
    --cc=syzbot+62262fdc0e01d99573fc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.