From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@kernel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+62262fdc0e01d99573fc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz,
jlayton@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev,
swapnil.sapkal@amd.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, v9fs@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] INFO: task hung in netfs_unbuffered_write_iter
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 23:58:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-LEsPFE4e7TTMiY@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f855a988-d5e9-4f5a-8b49-891828367ed7@amd.com>
Thanks for the traces.
w/ revert
K Prateek Nayak wrote on Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 08:19:26PM +0530:
> kworker/100:1-1803 [100] ..... 286.618822: p9_fd_poll: p9_fd_poll rd poll
> kworker/100:1-1803 [100] ..... 286.618822: p9_fd_poll: p9_fd_request wr poll
> kworker/100:1-1803 [100] ..... 286.618823: p9_read_work: Data read wait 7
new behavior
> repro-4076 [031] ..... 95.011394: p9_fd_poll: p9_fd_poll rd poll
> repro-4076 [031] ..... 95.011394: p9_fd_poll: p9_fd_request wr poll
> repro-4076 [031] ..... 99.731970: p9_client_rpc: Wait event killable (-512)
For me the problem isn't so much that this gets ERESTARTSYS but that it
nevers gets to read the 7 bytes that are available?
If the repro has already written the bytes in both cases then there's no
reason to wait 5 seconds here...
OTOH syzbot 9p code is silly and might have been depending on something
that's not supposed to work e.g. they might be missing a flush or
equivalent for all I know (I still haven't looked at the repro)
--
Dominique
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-22 15:54 [syzbot] [netfs?] INFO: task hung in netfs_unbuffered_write_iter syzbot
2025-03-23 18:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 19:17 ` syzbot
2025-03-23 19:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 19:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-23 19:52 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-23 21:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-24 10:47 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 11:15 ` syzbot
2025-03-24 13:17 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-24 13:19 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 14:52 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 16:03 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-24 16:25 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-24 16:36 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-25 2:52 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-25 12:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-25 12:36 ` Dominique Martinet
2025-03-25 13:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-25 14:49 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-25 14:58 ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
2025-03-26 12:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-26 12:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-26 13:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-27 17:46 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-27 21:19 ` syzbot
2025-03-27 22:18 ` asmadeus
2025-03-28 4:01 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-28 4:43 ` syzbot
2025-03-28 13:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 13:07 ` syzbot
2025-03-28 13:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 13:49 ` syzbot
2025-03-28 14:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 15:22 ` syzbot
2025-03-28 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-28 17:56 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-28 18:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-29 0:00 ` asmadeus
2025-03-29 14:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-29 23:27 ` asmadeus
2025-03-30 10:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 20:03 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-23 20:43 ` syzbot
2025-03-28 18:14 ` David Howells
2025-03-28 18:44 ` syzbot
2025-03-28 19:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-24 12:49 ` Edward Adam Davis
2025-03-24 13:37 ` syzbot
2025-08-03 12:09 ` syzbot
[not found] <20250323002028.3563-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-23 1:15 ` syzbot
[not found] <20250323021219.3580-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-23 2:48 ` syzbot
[not found] <20250324111613.3620-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-24 11:34 ` syzbot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-LEsPFE4e7TTMiY@codewreck.org \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=syzbot+62262fdc0e01d99573fc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.