* [PATCH] staging: greybus: Remove unnecessary NUL-termination checks
@ 2025-03-31 18:39 Thorsten Blum
2025-03-31 23:31 ` Alex Elder
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Blum @ 2025-03-31 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar, Johan Hovold, Alex Elder, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Thorsten Blum, greybus-dev, linux-staging, linux-kernel
Commit 18f44de63f88 ("staging: greybus: change strncpy() to
strscpy_pad()") didn't remove the now unnecessary NUL-termination
checks. Unlike strncpy(), strscpy_pad() guarantees that the destination
buffer is NUL-terminated, making the checks obsolete. Remove them.
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
---
drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c | 39 +------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c
index a47385175582..852c0830261f 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c
@@ -125,16 +125,6 @@ static int fw_mgmt_interface_fw_version_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt,
strscpy_pad(fw_info->firmware_tag, response.firmware_tag);
- /*
- * The firmware-tag should be NULL terminated, otherwise throw error but
- * don't fail.
- */
- if (fw_info->firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] != '\0') {
- dev_err(fw_mgmt->parent,
- "fw-version: firmware-tag is not NULL terminated\n");
- fw_info->firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] = '\0';
- }
-
return 0;
}
@@ -154,15 +144,6 @@ static int fw_mgmt_load_and_validate_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt,
request.load_method = load_method;
strscpy_pad(request.firmware_tag, tag);
- /*
- * The firmware-tag should be NULL terminated, otherwise throw error and
- * fail.
- */
- if (request.firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] != '\0') {
- dev_err(fw_mgmt->parent, "load-and-validate: firmware-tag is not NULL terminated\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
/* Allocate ids from 1 to 255 (u8-max), 0 is an invalid id */
ret = ida_alloc_range(&fw_mgmt->id_map, 1, 255, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -250,15 +231,6 @@ static int fw_mgmt_backend_fw_version_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt,
strscpy_pad(request.firmware_tag, fw_info->firmware_tag);
- /*
- * The firmware-tag should be NULL terminated, otherwise throw error and
- * fail.
- */
- if (request.firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] != '\0') {
- dev_err(fw_mgmt->parent, "backend-version: firmware-tag is not NULL terminated\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
ret = gb_operation_sync(connection,
GB_FW_MGMT_TYPE_BACKEND_FW_VERSION, &request,
sizeof(request), &response, sizeof(response));
@@ -301,16 +273,7 @@ static int fw_mgmt_backend_fw_update_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt,
struct gb_fw_mgmt_backend_fw_update_request request;
int ret;
- ret = strscpy_pad(request.firmware_tag, tag);
-
- /*
- * The firmware-tag should be NULL terminated, otherwise throw error and
- * fail.
- */
- if (ret == -E2BIG) {
- dev_err(fw_mgmt->parent, "backend-update: firmware-tag is not NULL terminated\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ strscpy_pad(request.firmware_tag, tag);
/* Allocate ids from 1 to 255 (u8-max), 0 is an invalid id */
ret = ida_alloc_range(&fw_mgmt->id_map, 1, 255, GFP_KERNEL);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Remove unnecessary NUL-termination checks 2025-03-31 18:39 [PATCH] staging: greybus: Remove unnecessary NUL-termination checks Thorsten Blum @ 2025-03-31 23:31 ` Alex Elder 2025-04-01 19:51 ` Thorsten Blum 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Alex Elder @ 2025-03-31 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thorsten Blum, Viresh Kumar, Johan Hovold, Alex Elder, Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: greybus-dev, linux-staging, linux-kernel On 3/31/25 1:39 PM, Thorsten Blum wrote: > Commit 18f44de63f88 ("staging: greybus: change strncpy() to > strscpy_pad()") didn't remove the now unnecessary NUL-termination > checks. Unlike strncpy(), strscpy_pad() guarantees that the destination > buffer is NUL-terminated, making the checks obsolete. Remove them. > > Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev> This looks good! Although the NUL-termination check isn't needed, it isn't safe to ignore the return value of strscpy_pad(). More below. In all cases, it looks like strscpy_pad() (and not just strscpy()) is the correct thing to call, because the pad bytes are passed either to user space, or supplied as part of a Greybus request message. > --- > drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c | 39 +------------------------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 38 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c > index a47385175582..852c0830261f 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-management.c > @@ -125,16 +125,6 @@ static int fw_mgmt_interface_fw_version_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt, > > strscpy_pad(fw_info->firmware_tag, response.firmware_tag); > > - /* > - * The firmware-tag should be NULL terminated, otherwise throw error but > - * don't fail. > - */ > - if (fw_info->firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] != '\0') { > - dev_err(fw_mgmt->parent, > - "fw-version: firmware-tag is not NULL terminated\n"); > - fw_info->firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] = '\0'; > - } Interesting this didn't return an error, while others below did. The sizes of the arrays passed to strscpy_pad() are not necessarily the same, so you should check for its return value. fw_info->firmware_tag is GB_FIRMWARE_U_TAG_MAX_SIZE=10 bytes response.firmware_tag is GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE=10 bytes also, but these could theoretically change independently. > - > return 0; > } > > @@ -154,15 +144,6 @@ static int fw_mgmt_load_and_validate_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt, > request.load_method = load_method; > strscpy_pad(request.firmware_tag, tag); > Here the maximum length of the tag is GB_FIRMWARE_U_TAG_MAX_SIZE bytes, and it may or may not be NUL-terminated. The size of request.firmware_tag is GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE. Again you can't be sure they're the same, and even if they are, the source could be truncated. > - /* > - * The firmware-tag should be NULL terminated, otherwise throw error and > - * fail. > - */ > - if (request.firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] != '\0') { > - dev_err(fw_mgmt->parent, "load-and-validate: firmware-tag is not NULL terminated\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > - > /* Allocate ids from 1 to 255 (u8-max), 0 is an invalid id */ > ret = ida_alloc_range(&fw_mgmt->id_map, 1, 255, GFP_KERNEL); > if (ret < 0) { > @@ -250,15 +231,6 @@ static int fw_mgmt_backend_fw_version_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt, > > strscpy_pad(request.firmware_tag, fw_info->firmware_tag); > The size of request.firmware_tag is GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE bytes. The size of fw_info->firmware_tag is GB_FIRMWARE_U_TAG_MAX_SIZE bytes. Check the return value for -E2BIG. > - /* > - * The firmware-tag should be NULL terminated, otherwise throw error and > - * fail. > - */ > - if (request.firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] != '\0') { > - dev_err(fw_mgmt->parent, "backend-version: firmware-tag is not NULL terminated\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > - > ret = gb_operation_sync(connection, > GB_FW_MGMT_TYPE_BACKEND_FW_VERSION, &request, > sizeof(request), &response, sizeof(response)); > @@ -301,16 +273,7 @@ static int fw_mgmt_backend_fw_update_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt, > struct gb_fw_mgmt_backend_fw_update_request request; > int ret; > > - ret = strscpy_pad(request.firmware_tag, tag); > - > - /* > - * The firmware-tag should be NULL terminated, otherwise throw error and > - * fail. > - */ > - if (ret == -E2BIG) { > - dev_err(fw_mgmt->parent, "backend-update: firmware-tag is not NULL terminated\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > + strscpy_pad(request.firmware_tag, tag); The size of request.firmware_tag is GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE bytes. The maximum size of tag is GB_FIRMWARE_U_TAG_MAX_SIZE bytes, and it may or may not be NUL-terminated. So this case should stay as-is, and check for -E2BIG. -Alex > /* Allocate ids from 1 to 255 (u8-max), 0 is an invalid id */ > ret = ida_alloc_range(&fw_mgmt->id_map, 1, 255, GFP_KERNEL); ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Remove unnecessary NUL-termination checks 2025-03-31 23:31 ` Alex Elder @ 2025-04-01 19:51 ` Thorsten Blum 2025-04-01 19:55 ` Alex Elder 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Thorsten Blum @ 2025-04-01 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Elder Cc: Viresh Kumar, Johan Hovold, Alex Elder, Greg Kroah-Hartman, greybus-dev, linux-staging, linux-kernel On 1. Apr 2025, at 01:31, Alex Elder wrote: > On 3/31/25 1:39 PM, Thorsten Blum wrote: >> @@ -125,16 +125,6 @@ static int fw_mgmt_interface_fw_version_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt, >> strscpy_pad(fw_info->firmware_tag, response.firmware_tag); >> - /* >> - * The firmware-tag should be NULL terminated, otherwise throw error but >> - * don't fail. >> - */ >> - if (fw_info->firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] != '\0') { >> - dev_err(fw_mgmt->parent, >> - "fw-version: firmware-tag is not NULL terminated\n"); >> - fw_info->firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] = '\0'; >> - } > > Interesting this didn't return an error, while others below did. Should I keep it that way when checking for a truncated firmware tag or should this also fail like the others? Thanks, Thorsten ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Remove unnecessary NUL-termination checks 2025-04-01 19:51 ` Thorsten Blum @ 2025-04-01 19:55 ` Alex Elder 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Alex Elder @ 2025-04-01 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thorsten Blum Cc: Viresh Kumar, Johan Hovold, Alex Elder, Greg Kroah-Hartman, greybus-dev, linux-staging, linux-kernel On 4/1/25 2:51 PM, Thorsten Blum wrote: > On 1. Apr 2025, at 01:31, Alex Elder wrote: >> On 3/31/25 1:39 PM, Thorsten Blum wrote: >>> @@ -125,16 +125,6 @@ static int fw_mgmt_interface_fw_version_operation(struct fw_mgmt *fw_mgmt, >>> strscpy_pad(fw_info->firmware_tag, response.firmware_tag); >>> - /* >>> - * The firmware-tag should be NULL terminated, otherwise throw error but >>> - * don't fail. >>> - */ >>> - if (fw_info->firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] != '\0') { >>> - dev_err(fw_mgmt->parent, >>> - "fw-version: firmware-tag is not NULL terminated\n"); >>> - fw_info->firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE - 1] = '\0'; >>> - } >> >> Interesting this didn't return an error, while others below did. > > Should I keep it that way when checking for a truncated firmware tag or > should this also fail like the others? > > Thanks, > Thorsten > I don't know the answer right now, and I don't have time at the moment to investigate. Just keep that logic the way it is, and make your other fix. -Alex ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-01 19:55 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-03-31 18:39 [PATCH] staging: greybus: Remove unnecessary NUL-termination checks Thorsten Blum 2025-03-31 23:31 ` Alex Elder 2025-04-01 19:51 ` Thorsten Blum 2025-04-01 19:55 ` Alex Elder
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.