All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/6] i2c: core: Move client towards fwnode
Date: Mon,  7 Apr 2025 12:55:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250407095852.215809-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)

The struct i2c_board_info has of_node and fwnode members. This is
quite confusing as they are of the same semantics and it's tend
to have an issue if user assigns both. Luckily there is only a
single driver that does this and fix was sent today. Nevertheless
the series moves the client handling code to use fwnode and deprecates
the of_node member in the respective documentation.

Tomi, can you test this series + the patch we discussed earlier so it works as
expected?

In v2:
- covered i2c-core-slave.c where it makes sense
- covered i2c-core-of.c where it makes sense
- rebased on top of the latest code base

Andy Shevchenko (6):
  i2c: core: Drop duplicate check before calling OF APIs
  i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check
  i2c: core: Switch to fwnode APIs to get IRQ
  i2c: core: Reuse fwnode variable where it makes sense
  i2c: core: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device
  i2c: core: Deprecate of_node in struct i2c_board_info

 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c  | 59 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-of.c    |  1 -
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c | 11 ++++---
 include/linux/i2c.h          |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.2


             reply	other threads:[~2025-04-07  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-07  9:55 Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-04-07  9:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] i2c: core: Drop duplicate check before calling OF APIs Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07  9:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] i2c: core: Unify the firmware node type check Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 12:45   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-07 13:48     ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 13:47   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-07  9:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] i2c: core: Switch to fwnode APIs to get IRQ Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 13:47   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-07  9:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] i2c: core: Reuse fwnode variable where it makes sense Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07  9:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] i2c: core: Do not dereference fwnode in struct device Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07  9:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] i2c: core: Deprecate of_node in struct i2c_board_info Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-07 11:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] i2c: core: Move client towards fwnode Tomi Valkeinen
2025-04-07 12:23   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250407095852.215809-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.