All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
Cc: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>,
	"William Breathitt Gray" <wbg@kernel.org>,
	"Sebastian Reichel" <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
	"Kever Yang" <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@collabora.com, "Jonas Karlman" <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	"Detlev Casanova" <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: pinctrl: rockchip: increase max amount of device functions
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 12:27:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250408172707.GA2283098-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408-rk3576-pwm-v1-1-a49286c2ca8e@collabora.com>

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 02:32:13PM +0200, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> With the introduction of the RK3576, the maximum device function ID used
> increased to 14, as anyone can easily verify for themselves with:
> 
>   rg -g '*-pinctrl.dtsi' '<\d+\s+RK_P..\s+(?<func>\d+)\s.*>;$' --trim \
>   -NI -r '$func' arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/ | sort -g | uniq
> 
> Unfortunately, this wasn't caught by dt-validate as those pins are
> omit-if-no-ref and we had no reference to them in any tree so far.

Sounds like we need a way to disable that for validation. We'd need a 
dtc flag to ignore that and then set that flag for CHECK_DTBS.

Rob


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
Cc: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>,
	"William Breathitt Gray" <wbg@kernel.org>,
	"Sebastian Reichel" <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
	"Kever Yang" <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@collabora.com, "Jonas Karlman" <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	"Detlev Casanova" <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: pinctrl: rockchip: increase max amount of device functions
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 12:27:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250408172707.GA2283098-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408-rk3576-pwm-v1-1-a49286c2ca8e@collabora.com>

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 02:32:13PM +0200, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> With the introduction of the RK3576, the maximum device function ID used
> increased to 14, as anyone can easily verify for themselves with:
> 
>   rg -g '*-pinctrl.dtsi' '<\d+\s+RK_P..\s+(?<func>\d+)\s.*>;$' --trim \
>   -NI -r '$func' arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/ | sort -g | uniq
> 
> Unfortunately, this wasn't caught by dt-validate as those pins are
> omit-if-no-ref and we had no reference to them in any tree so far.

Sounds like we need a way to disable that for validation. We'd need a 
dtc flag to ignore that and then set that flag for CHECK_DTBS.

Rob

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-08 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-08 12:32 [PATCH 0/7] Add Rockchip RK3576 PWM Support Through MFPWM Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 12:32 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/7] dt-bindings: pinctrl: rockchip: increase max amount of device functions Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 12:32   ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 16:08   ` Conor Dooley
2025-04-08 16:08     ` Conor Dooley
2025-04-08 17:27   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2025-04-08 17:27     ` Rob Herring
2025-05-31 12:59   ` Heiko Stübner
2025-05-31 12:59     ` Heiko Stübner
2025-04-08 12:32 ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: pwm: Add a new binding for rockchip,rk3576-pwm Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 12:32   ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 16:07   ` Conor Dooley
2025-04-08 16:07     ` Conor Dooley
2025-04-08 12:32 ` [PATCH 3/7] soc: rockchip: add utils header for things shared across drivers Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 12:32   ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-05-31 13:26   ` Heiko Stübner
2025-05-31 13:26     ` Heiko Stübner
2025-04-08 12:32 ` [PATCH 4/7] soc: rockchip: add mfpwm driver Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 12:32   ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 20:03   ` Heiko Stübner
2025-04-08 20:03     ` Heiko Stübner
2025-04-09 13:01     ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-09 13:01       ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-05-08  7:13       ` Damon Ding
2025-05-08  7:13         ` Damon Ding
2025-05-31 21:48   ` Heiko Stübner
2025-05-31 21:48     ` Heiko Stübner
2025-06-02 12:15     ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-02 12:15       ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-06-02 13:14       ` Heiko Stübner
2025-06-02 13:14         ` Heiko Stübner
2025-04-08 12:32 ` [PATCH 5/7] pwm: Add rockchip PWMv4 driver Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 12:32   ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-05-13 17:26   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-05-13 17:26     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-05-22 13:02     ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-05-22 13:02       ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-05-23 15:02       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-05-23 15:02         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-05-26  9:30         ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-05-26  9:30           ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 12:32 ` [PATCH 6/7] counter: Add rockchip-pwm-capture driver Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 12:32   ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-05-07  8:47   ` William Breathitt Gray
2025-05-07  8:47     ` William Breathitt Gray
2025-04-08 12:32 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: add PWM nodes to RK3576 SoC dtsi Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-04-08 12:32   ` Nicolas Frattaroli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250408172707.GA2283098-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=detlev.casanova@collabora.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
    --cc=wbg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.