From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@strace.io>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
strace-devel@lists.strace.io, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] syscall.h: add syscall_set_arguments()
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:14:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410181422.GA3431770@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408213131.GA2872426@ax162>
Hi Andrew,
Can you please fold the diff at the end of my message into
syscallh-add-syscall_set_arguments.patch? It sounds like Palmer will
apply the same diff to syscall_get_arguments():
https://lore.kernel.org/mhng-cf999eb1-59c4-4784-8c01-44b1e2482a50@palmer-ri-x1c9a/
Thanks!
Nathan
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 02:31:31PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> [dropping majority of folks since this seems irrelevant to them]
>
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:20:09PM +0200, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > This function is going to be needed on all HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
> > architectures to implement PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO API.
> >
> > This partially reverts commit 7962c2eddbfe ("arch: remove unused
> > function syscall_set_arguments()") by reusing some of old
> > syscall_set_arguments() implementations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@strace.io>
> > Tested-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
> > Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> # parisc
> > Reviewed-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk> # mips
> ...
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> > index 121fff429dce..8d389ba995c8 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> > @@ -66,6 +66,15 @@ static inline void syscall_get_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
> > memcpy(args, ®s->a1, 5 * sizeof(args[0]));
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
> > + struct pt_regs *regs,
> > + const unsigned long *args)
> > +{
> > + regs->orig_a0 = args[0];
> > + args++;
> > + memcpy(®s->a1, args, 5 * sizeof(regs->a1));
> > +}
>
> This upsets the compiletime fortify checks, as I see a warning after
> syscall_set_arguments() starts being used in kernel/ptrace.c later in
> the series.
>
> $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux- allmodconfig kernel/ptrace.o
> In file included from include/linux/string.h:392,
> from include/linux/bitmap.h:13,
> from include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
> from arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h:55,
> from include/linux/sched.h:13,
> from kernel/ptrace.c:13:
> In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk',
> inlined from 'syscall_set_arguments.isra' at arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h:82:2:
> include/linux/fortify-string.h:571:25: error: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with attribute warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror=attribute-warning]
> 571 | __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> The compiler knows the size of the destination and the size to be copied
> so it knows there will be an (intentional) overwrite here.
> struct_group() would normally work but I think this structure already
> has a struct_group() around some of the members that would be needed. I
> build tested eliminating the memcpy() altogether, which would appear to
> work, but I am not sure if there is a better solution, hence just the
> report.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> index a5281cdf2b10..70ec19dc8506 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> @@ -78,8 +78,11 @@ static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
> const unsigned long *args)
> {
> regs->orig_a0 = args[0];
> - args++;
> - memcpy(®s->a1, args, 5 * sizeof(regs->a1));
> + regs->a1 = args[1];
> + regs->a2 = args[2];
> + regs->a3 = args[3];
> + regs->a4 = args[4];
> + regs->a5 = args[5];
> }
>
> static inline int syscall_get_arch(struct task_struct *task)
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@strace.io>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
strace-devel@lists.strace.io, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] syscall.h: add syscall_set_arguments()
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:14:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410181422.GA3431770@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408213131.GA2872426@ax162>
Hi Andrew,
Can you please fold the diff at the end of my message into
syscallh-add-syscall_set_arguments.patch? It sounds like Palmer will
apply the same diff to syscall_get_arguments():
https://lore.kernel.org/mhng-cf999eb1-59c4-4784-8c01-44b1e2482a50@palmer-ri-x1c9a/
Thanks!
Nathan
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 02:31:31PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> [dropping majority of folks since this seems irrelevant to them]
>
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:20:09PM +0200, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > This function is going to be needed on all HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
> > architectures to implement PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO API.
> >
> > This partially reverts commit 7962c2eddbfe ("arch: remove unused
> > function syscall_set_arguments()") by reusing some of old
> > syscall_set_arguments() implementations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@strace.io>
> > Tested-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
> > Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> # parisc
> > Reviewed-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk> # mips
> ...
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> > index 121fff429dce..8d389ba995c8 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> > @@ -66,6 +66,15 @@ static inline void syscall_get_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
> > memcpy(args, ®s->a1, 5 * sizeof(args[0]));
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
> > + struct pt_regs *regs,
> > + const unsigned long *args)
> > +{
> > + regs->orig_a0 = args[0];
> > + args++;
> > + memcpy(®s->a1, args, 5 * sizeof(regs->a1));
> > +}
>
> This upsets the compiletime fortify checks, as I see a warning after
> syscall_set_arguments() starts being used in kernel/ptrace.c later in
> the series.
>
> $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux- allmodconfig kernel/ptrace.o
> In file included from include/linux/string.h:392,
> from include/linux/bitmap.h:13,
> from include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
> from arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h:55,
> from include/linux/sched.h:13,
> from kernel/ptrace.c:13:
> In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk',
> inlined from 'syscall_set_arguments.isra' at arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h:82:2:
> include/linux/fortify-string.h:571:25: error: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with attribute warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror=attribute-warning]
> 571 | __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> The compiler knows the size of the destination and the size to be copied
> so it knows there will be an (intentional) overwrite here.
> struct_group() would normally work but I think this structure already
> has a struct_group() around some of the members that would be needed. I
> build tested eliminating the memcpy() altogether, which would appear to
> work, but I am not sure if there is a better solution, hence just the
> report.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> index a5281cdf2b10..70ec19dc8506 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/syscall.h
> @@ -78,8 +78,11 @@ static inline void syscall_set_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
> const unsigned long *args)
> {
> regs->orig_a0 = args[0];
> - args++;
> - memcpy(®s->a1, args, 5 * sizeof(regs->a1));
> + regs->a1 = args[1];
> + regs->a2 = args[2];
> + regs->a3 = args[3];
> + regs->a4 = args[4];
> + regs->a5 = args[5];
> }
>
> static inline int syscall_get_arch(struct task_struct *task)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-03 11:19 [PATCH v7 0/6] ptrace: introduce PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO API Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-03 11:19 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-03 11:19 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-03 11:19 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] hexagon: add syscall_set_return_value() Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-03 11:20 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] syscall.h: add syscall_set_arguments() Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-03 11:20 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-03 11:20 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-04-08 21:31 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-04-08 21:31 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-04-08 22:36 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-04-08 22:36 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-04-09 0:38 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-04-09 0:38 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-04-09 6:40 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-04-09 6:40 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-04-09 15:52 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-04-09 15:52 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-04-09 23:18 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-04-09 23:18 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-04-10 18:14 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2025-04-10 18:14 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-03-03 11:20 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] syscall.h: introduce syscall_set_nr() Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-03 11:20 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-03 11:20 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-03 11:20 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] ptrace_get_syscall_info: factor out ptrace_get_syscall_info_op Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-03 11:20 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] ptrace: introduce PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO request Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-03 11:20 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] selftests/ptrace: add a test case for PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-06 2:02 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] ptrace: introduce PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO API Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-25 10:41 ` Dmitry V. Levin
2025-03-25 17:57 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250410181422.GA3431770@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=ldv@strace.io \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=strace-devel@lists.strace.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.