* [PATCH 6.1.y] block: make bio_check_eod work for zero sized devices
@ 2025-04-12 10:24 Miguel García
2025-04-12 15:43 ` Greg KH
2025-04-13 16:46 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] " Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Miguel García @ 2025-04-12 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: skhan, Christoph Hellwig, syzbot+2aca91e1d3ae43aef10c, Jens Axboe,
Miguel García
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
commit 3eb96946f0be6bf447cbdf219aba22bc42672f92 upstream.
This patch is a backport.
Since the dawn of time bio_check_eod has a check for a non-zero size of
the device. This doesn't really make any sense as we never want to send
I/O to a device that's been set to zero size, or never moved out of that.
I am a bit surprised we haven't caught this for a long time, but the
removal of the extra validation inside of zram caused syzbot to trip
over this issue recently. I've added a Fixes tag for that commit, but
the issue really goes back way before git history.
Fixes: 9fe95babc742 ("zram: remove valid_io_request")
Reported-by: syzbot+2aca91e1d3ae43aef10c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Bug: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2aca91e1d3ae43aef10c
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230524060538.1593686-1-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
(cherry picked from commit 3eb96946f0be6bf447cbdf219aba22bc42672f92)
Signed-off-by: Miguel García <miguelgarciaroman8@gmail.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 94941e3ce219..6a66f4f6912f 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static inline int bio_check_eod(struct bio *bio)
sector_t maxsector = bdev_nr_sectors(bio->bi_bdev);
unsigned int nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
- if (nr_sectors && maxsector &&
+ if (nr_sectors &&
(nr_sectors > maxsector ||
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector > maxsector - nr_sectors)) {
pr_info_ratelimited("%s: attempt to access beyond end of device\n"
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] block: make bio_check_eod work for zero sized devices
2025-04-12 10:24 [PATCH 6.1.y] block: make bio_check_eod work for zero sized devices Miguel García
@ 2025-04-12 15:43 ` Greg KH
2026-08-29 17:19 ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2] " Miguel García
2025-04-13 16:46 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] " Sasha Levin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2025-04-12 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miguel García
Cc: stable, skhan, Christoph Hellwig, syzbot+2aca91e1d3ae43aef10c,
Jens Axboe
On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 12:24:24PM +0200, Miguel García wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> commit 3eb96946f0be6bf447cbdf219aba22bc42672f92 upstream.
>
> This patch is a backport.
Why? What requires this change? I don't see the justification for
this, especially:
> Fixes: 9fe95babc742 ("zram: remove valid_io_request")
That commit is in 6.4, NOT 6.1.y, so why does 6.1.y need this?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6.1.y v2] block: make bio_check_eod work for zero sized devices
2025-04-12 15:43 ` Greg KH
@ 2026-08-29 17:19 ` Miguel García
2026-08-31 1:39 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Miguel García @ 2026-08-29 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: gregkh, sashal, axboe, hch, linux-block,
syzbot+b8d61a58b7c7ebd2c8e0, syzbot+2aca91e1d3ae43aef10c,
Miguel García
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
commit 3eb96946f0be6bf447cbdf219aba22bc42672f92 upstream.
Since the dawn of time bio_check_eod has a check for a non-zero size of
the device. This doesn't really make any sense as we never want to send
I/O to a device that's been set to zero size, or never moved out of that.
I am a bit surprised we haven't caught this for a long time, but the
removal of the extra validation inside of zram caused syzbot to trip
over this issue recently. I've added a Fixes tag for that commit, but
the issue really goes back way before git history.
Fixes: 9fe95babc742 ("zram: remove valid_io_request")
Reported-by: syzbot+b8d61a58b7c7ebd2c8e0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230524060538.1593686-1-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Backport note for 6.1.y:
The same underlying bug affects 6.1.y even though 9fe95babc742 is not in
that tree. The syzbot reproducer attaches a socket to /dev/nbd0 without
setting its capacity, then mounts it as BEFS. BEFS calls sb_bread() while
bdev_nr_sectors() is zero. The maxsector guard makes bio_check_eod() accept
that read, which reaches NBD and waits for a response instead of failing
with -EIO. syzbot reproduced the resulting __bread_gfp() hang on 6.1.y and
identified this upstream commit by fix bisection.
Reported-by: syzbot+2aca91e1d3ae43aef10c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2aca91e1d3ae43aef10c
Signed-off-by: Miguel García <miguelgarciaroman8@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Explain the 6.1.y NBD and BEFS failure path, as requested by Greg:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/2025041215-grudge-rearrange-7123@gregkh
- Preserve both syzbot reports and the upstream commit metadata.
- Refresh against v6.1.186.
Older stable trees are not included here because this backport and its local
validation are scoped to the syzbot report for 6.1.y.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250412102424.56383-1-miguelgarciaroman8@gmail.com
block/blk-core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 25b4733..1fcd80a 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static inline int bio_check_eod(struct bio *bio)
sector_t maxsector = bdev_nr_sectors(bio->bi_bdev);
unsigned int nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
- if (nr_sectors && maxsector &&
+ if (nr_sectors &&
(nr_sectors > maxsector ||
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector > maxsector - nr_sectors)) {
pr_info_ratelimited("%s: attempt to access beyond end of device\n"
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.1.y v2] block: make bio_check_eod work for zero sized devices
2026-08-29 17:19 ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2] " Miguel García
@ 2026-08-31 1:39 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2026-08-31 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Sasha Levin, gregkh, axboe, hch, linux-block,
syzbot+b8d61a58b7c7ebd2c8e0, syzbot+2aca91e1d3ae43aef10c,
Miguel García
> Since the dawn of time bio_check_eod has a check for a non-zero size of
> the device. This doesn't really make any sense as we never want to send
> I/O to a device that's been set to zero size, or never moved out of that.
Queued for 6.1, thanks.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1.y] block: make bio_check_eod work for zero sized devices
2025-04-12 10:24 [PATCH 6.1.y] block: make bio_check_eod work for zero sized devices Miguel García
2025-04-12 15:43 ` Greg KH
@ 2025-04-13 16:46 ` Sasha Levin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2025-04-13 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Miguel García, Sasha Levin
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 3eb96946f0be6bf447cbdf219aba22bc42672f92
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: <miguelgarciaroman8@gmail.com>
Commit author: Christoph Hellwig<hch@lst.de>
Status in newer kernel trees:
6.14.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.13.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.6.y | Present (exact SHA1)
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1: 3eb96946f0be6 ! 1: 6a6f180aae691 block: make bio_check_eod work for zero sized devices
@@ Metadata
## Commit message ##
block: make bio_check_eod work for zero sized devices
+ commit 3eb96946f0be6bf447cbdf219aba22bc42672f92 upstream.
+
+ This patch is a backport.
+
Since the dawn of time bio_check_eod has a check for a non-zero size of
the device. This doesn't really make any sense as we never want to send
I/O to a device that's been set to zero size, or never moved out of that.
@@ Commit message
the issue really goes back way before git history.
Fixes: 9fe95babc742 ("zram: remove valid_io_request")
- Reported-by: syzbot+b8d61a58b7c7ebd2c8e0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
+ Reported-by: syzbot+2aca91e1d3ae43aef10c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
+ Bug: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2aca91e1d3ae43aef10c
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230524060538.1593686-1-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
+ (cherry picked from commit 3eb96946f0be6bf447cbdf219aba22bc42672f92)
+ Signed-off-by: Miguel García <miguelgarciaroman8@gmail.com>
## block/blk-core.c ##
@@ block/blk-core.c: static inline int bio_check_eod(struct bio *bio)
---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-6.1.y | Success | Success |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-31 1:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-12 10:24 [PATCH 6.1.y] block: make bio_check_eod work for zero sized devices Miguel García
2025-04-12 15:43 ` Greg KH
2026-08-29 17:19 ` [PATCH 6.1.y v2] " Miguel García
2026-08-31 1:39 ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-13 16:46 ` [PATCH 6.1.y] " Sasha Levin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.