* [PATCH] bpf: Remove tracing program restriction on map types
@ 2025-04-15 13:09 Devaansh Kumar
2025-04-15 13:19 ` Greg KH
2025-04-15 21:43 ` Sasha Levin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Devaansh Kumar @ 2025-04-15 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, sashal, stable, ast, daniel
Cc: Devaansh Kumar, bpf, linux-kernel, skhan, linux-kernel-mentees,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Andrii Nakryiko
[ Upstream commit 96da3f7d489d11b43e7c1af90d876b9a2492cca8 ]
The hash map is now fully converted to bpf_mem_alloc. Its implementation is not
allocating synchronously and not calling call_rcu() directly. It's now safe to
use non-preallocated hash maps in all types of tracing programs including
BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT that runs out of NMI context.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220902211058.60789-13-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Devaansh Kumar <devaanshk840@gmail.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 29 -----------------------------
1 file changed, 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 7049a85a78ab..77a75ccaae5e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -11700,35 +11700,6 @@ static int check_map_prog_compatibility(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
{
enum bpf_prog_type prog_type = resolve_prog_type(prog);
- /*
- * Validate that trace type programs use preallocated hash maps.
- *
- * For programs attached to PERF events this is mandatory as the
- * perf NMI can hit any arbitrary code sequence.
- *
- * All other trace types using preallocated hash maps are unsafe as
- * well because tracepoint or kprobes can be inside locked regions
- * of the memory allocator or at a place where a recursion into the
- * memory allocator would see inconsistent state.
- *
- * On RT enabled kernels run-time allocation of all trace type
- * programs is strictly prohibited due to lock type constraints. On
- * !RT kernels it is allowed for backwards compatibility reasons for
- * now, but warnings are emitted so developers are made aware of
- * the unsafety and can fix their programs before this is enforced.
- */
- if (is_tracing_prog_type(prog_type) && !is_preallocated_map(map)) {
- if (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT) {
- verbose(env, "perf_event programs can only use preallocated hash map\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) {
- verbose(env, "trace type programs can only use preallocated hash map\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- WARN_ONCE(1, "trace type BPF program uses run-time allocation\n");
- verbose(env, "trace type programs with run-time allocated hash maps are unsafe. Switch to preallocated hash maps.\n");
- }
if (map_value_has_spin_lock(map)) {
if (prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER) {
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] bpf: Remove tracing program restriction on map types
2025-04-15 13:09 [PATCH] bpf: Remove tracing program restriction on map types Devaansh Kumar
@ 2025-04-15 13:19 ` Greg KH
2025-04-15 13:25 ` Devaansh Kumar
2025-04-15 21:43 ` Sasha Levin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2025-04-15 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Devaansh Kumar
Cc: sashal, stable, ast, daniel, bpf, linux-kernel, skhan,
linux-kernel-mentees, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Andrii Nakryiko
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 06:39:07PM +0530, Devaansh Kumar wrote:
> [ Upstream commit 96da3f7d489d11b43e7c1af90d876b9a2492cca8 ]
>
> The hash map is now fully converted to bpf_mem_alloc. Its implementation is not
> allocating synchronously and not calling call_rcu() directly. It's now safe to
> use non-preallocated hash maps in all types of tracing programs including
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT that runs out of NMI context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220902211058.60789-13-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Devaansh Kumar <devaanshk840@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 29 -----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 deletions(-)
what kernel tree(s) is this for?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bpf: Remove tracing program restriction on map types
2025-04-15 13:19 ` Greg KH
@ 2025-04-15 13:25 ` Devaansh Kumar
2025-04-15 15:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Devaansh Kumar @ 2025-04-15 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: sashal, stable, ast, daniel, bpf, linux-kernel, skhan,
linux-kernel-mentees, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Andrii Nakryiko
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 18:49, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> what kernel tree(s) is this for?
This backport is for v5.15.y stable version. My bad, I should have
mentioned it in the subject.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bpf: Remove tracing program restriction on map types
2025-04-15 13:25 ` Devaansh Kumar
@ 2025-04-15 15:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2025-04-15 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Devaansh Kumar
Cc: Greg KH, Sasha Levin, stable, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann,
bpf, LKML, Shuah Khan, linux-kernel-mentees,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Andrii Nakryiko
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 6:25 AM Devaansh Kumar <devaanshk840@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 18:49, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > what kernel tree(s) is this for?
>
> This backport is for v5.15.y stable version. My bad, I should have
> mentioned it in the subject.
Nack.
5.15 doesn't have bpf_mem_alloc.
This backport makes no sense.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bpf: Remove tracing program restriction on map types
2025-04-15 13:09 [PATCH] bpf: Remove tracing program restriction on map types Devaansh Kumar
2025-04-15 13:19 ` Greg KH
@ 2025-04-15 21:43 ` Sasha Levin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2025-04-15 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Devaansh Kumar, Sasha Levin
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 96da3f7d489d11b43e7c1af90d876b9a2492cca8
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: Devaansh Kumar<devaanshk840@gmail.com>
Commit author: Alexei Starovoitov<ast@kernel.org>
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1: 96da3f7d489d1 < -: ------------- bpf: Remove tracing program restriction on map types
-: ------------- > 1: 9bc5c94e278f7 Linux 6.14.2
---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-6.14.y | Success | Success |
| stable/linux-6.13.y | Success | Success |
| stable/linux-6.12.y | Success | Success |
| stable/linux-6.6.y | Success | Success |
| stable/linux-6.1.y | Success | Success |
| stable/linux-5.15.y | Success | Success |
| stable/linux-5.10.y | Success | Success |
| stable/linux-5.4.y | Success | Success |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-15 21:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-15 13:09 [PATCH] bpf: Remove tracing program restriction on map types Devaansh Kumar
2025-04-15 13:19 ` Greg KH
2025-04-15 13:25 ` Devaansh Kumar
2025-04-15 15:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-04-15 21:43 ` Sasha Levin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.