All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* + mempolicy-optimize-queue_folios_pte_range-by-pte-batching.patch added to mm-new branch
@ 2025-04-16 23:48 Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2025-04-16 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mm-commits, ziy, yang, willy, vishal.moola, ryan.roberts, hughd,
	david, baolin.wang, dev.jain, akpm


The patch titled
     Subject: mempolicy: optimize queue_folios_pte_range by PTE batching
has been added to the -mm mm-new branch.  Its filename is
     mempolicy-optimize-queue_folios_pte_range-by-pte-batching.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mempolicy-optimize-queue_folios_pte_range-by-pte-batching.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-new branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Subject: mempolicy: optimize queue_folios_pte_range by PTE batching
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:00:48 +0530

After the check for queue_folio_required(), the code only cares about the
folio in the for loop, i.e the PTEs are redundant.  Therefore, optimize
this loop by skipping over a PTE batch mapping the same folio.

With a test program migrating pages of the calling process, which includes
a mapped VMA of size 4GB with pte-mapped large folios of order-9, and
migrating once back and forth node-0 and node-1, the average execution
time reduces from 7.5 to 4 seconds, giving an approx 47% speedup.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250416053048.96479-1-dev.jain@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/mempolicy.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mempolicy-optimize-queue_folios_pte_range-by-pte-batching
+++ a/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -567,6 +567,7 @@ static void queue_folios_pmd(pmd_t *pmd,
 static int queue_folios_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
 			unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk)
 {
+	const fpb_t fpb_flags = FPB_IGNORE_DIRTY | FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY;
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma = walk->vma;
 	struct folio *folio;
 	struct queue_pages *qp = walk->private;
@@ -574,6 +575,7 @@ static int queue_folios_pte_range(pmd_t
 	pte_t *pte, *mapped_pte;
 	pte_t ptent;
 	spinlock_t *ptl;
+	int max_nr, nr;
 
 	ptl = pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma);
 	if (ptl) {
@@ -587,7 +589,9 @@ static int queue_folios_pte_range(pmd_t
 		walk->action = ACTION_AGAIN;
 		return 0;
 	}
-	for (; addr != end; pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
+	for (; addr != end; pte += nr, addr += nr * PAGE_SIZE) {
+		max_nr = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+		nr = 1;
 		ptent = ptep_get(pte);
 		if (pte_none(ptent))
 			continue;
@@ -599,6 +603,10 @@ static int queue_folios_pte_range(pmd_t
 		folio = vm_normal_folio(vma, addr, ptent);
 		if (!folio || folio_is_zone_device(folio))
 			continue;
+		if (folio_test_large(folio) && max_nr != 1)
+			nr = folio_pte_batch(folio, addr, pte, ptent,
+					     max_nr, fpb_flags,
+					     NULL, NULL, NULL);
 		/*
 		 * vm_normal_folio() filters out zero pages, but there might
 		 * still be reserved folios to skip, perhaps in a VDSO.
@@ -631,7 +639,7 @@ static int queue_folios_pte_range(pmd_t
 		if (!(flags & (MPOL_MF_MOVE | MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL)) ||
 		    !vma_migratable(vma) ||
 		    !migrate_folio_add(folio, qp->pagelist, flags)) {
-			qp->nr_failed++;
+			qp->nr_failed += nr;
 			if (strictly_unmovable(flags))
 				break;
 		}
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from dev.jain@arm.com are

mempolicy-optimize-queue_folios_pte_range-by-pte-batching.patch


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-04-16 23:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-16 23:48 + mempolicy-optimize-queue_folios_pte_range-by-pte-batching.patch added to mm-new branch Andrew Morton

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.