From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 13:31:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202504231319.Ruutd2WV-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73fdbbf9aafd3e24e12bb58f89c70959fb3a37f1.1745250534.git.iecedge@gmail.com>
Hi Jianlin,
[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jianlin-Lv/Enhance-BPF-execution-timing-by-excluding-IRQ-time/20250422-214957
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/73fdbbf9aafd3e24e12bb58f89c70959fb3a37f1.1745250534.git.iecedge%40gmail.com
patch subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20250423 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250423/202504231319.Ruutd2WV-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250423/202504231319.Ruutd2WV-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504231319.Ruutd2WV-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/kallsyms.c:25:
include/linux/filter.h: In function '__bpf_prog_run':
>> include/linux/filter.h:708:30: warning: unused variable 'cpu' [-Wunused-variable]
708 | unsigned int cpu;
| ^~~
>> include/linux/filter.h:706:60: warning: unused variable 'irq_delta' [-Wunused-variable]
706 | u64 duration, start, start_time, end_time, irq_delta;
| ^~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/filter.h:706:50: warning: unused variable 'end_time' [-Wunused-variable]
706 | u64 duration, start, start_time, end_time, irq_delta;
| ^~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/filter.h:706:38: warning: unused variable 'start_time' [-Wunused-variable]
706 | u64 duration, start, start_time, end_time, irq_delta;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
At top level:
cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-unterminated-string-initialization' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics
vim +/cpu +708 include/linux/filter.h
686
687 extern struct mutex nf_conn_btf_access_lock;
688 extern int (*nfct_btf_struct_access)(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
689 const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
690 int off, int size);
691
692 typedef unsigned int (*bpf_dispatcher_fn)(const void *ctx,
693 const struct bpf_insn *insnsi,
694 unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const void *,
695 const struct bpf_insn *));
696
697 static __always_inline u32 __bpf_prog_run(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
698 const void *ctx,
699 bpf_dispatcher_fn dfunc)
700 {
701 u32 ret;
702
703 cant_migrate();
704 if (static_branch_unlikely(&bpf_stats_enabled_key)) {
705 struct bpf_prog_stats *stats;
> 706 u64 duration, start, start_time, end_time, irq_delta;
707 unsigned long flags;
> 708 unsigned int cpu;
709
710 #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
711 if (in_task()) {
712 cpu = get_cpu();
713 put_cpu();
714 start_time = irq_time_read(cpu);
715 }
716 #endif
717
718 start = sched_clock();
719 ret = dfunc(ctx, prog->insnsi, prog->bpf_func);
720 duration = sched_clock() - start;
721
722 #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
723 if (in_task()) {
724 end_time = irq_time_read(cpu);
725 if (end_time > start_time) {
726 irq_delta = end_time - start_time;
727 duration -= irq_delta;
728 }
729 }
730 #endif
731
732 stats = this_cpu_ptr(prog->stats);
733 flags = u64_stats_update_begin_irqsave(&stats->syncp);
734 u64_stats_inc(&stats->cnt);
735 u64_stats_add(&stats->nsecs, duration);
736 u64_stats_update_end_irqrestore(&stats->syncp, flags);
737 } else {
738 ret = dfunc(ctx, prog->insnsi, prog->bpf_func);
739 }
740 return ret;
741 }
742
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 13:47 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Eliminate IRQ Time from BPF Program Running Duration Jianlin Lv
2025-04-22 13:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time Jianlin Lv
2025-04-22 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-22 17:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-04-23 5:31 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-04-22 13:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/2] Export irq_time_read for BPF module usage Jianlin Lv
2025-04-22 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202504231319.Ruutd2WV-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=iecedge@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.