* [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Eliminate IRQ Time from BPF Program Running Duration @ 2025-04-22 13:47 Jianlin Lv 2025-04-22 13:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time Jianlin Lv 2025-04-22 13:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/2] Export irq_time_read for BPF module usage Jianlin Lv 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Jianlin Lv @ 2025-04-22 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bpf Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, linux-kernel, iecedge, jianlv From: Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> Motivation: =========== This proposal aims to enhance the __bpf_prog_run function by eliminating IRQ time from the BPF program running duration. When a BPF program is attached to a kernel function running in user context, any interrupts that occur can lead to the BPF program's execution duration including the time spent in interrupt handling. This results in an observed increase in CPU usage attributed to eBPF. Design: ======= The elimination of IRQ time is built upon enabling CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING. Before a BPF program runs in user context, call irq_time_read to record current total IRQ time for the CPU. After the BPF program execution, call irq_time_read again to record the total IRQ time. The difference between these two readings gives the IRQ handling time for this BPF call. Then subtract the IRQ handling time from the total BPF processing duration. Currently, the irq_time_read function is defined as static, preventing its use by other modules. This proposal suggests exporting irq_time_read for use by the BPF module. TODOs: ====== - Support elimination of IRQ time for BPF trampoline. - Add selftests to validate the functionality. this mail is mainly to get feedback on the design and implementation approach. TODO item will be added in subsequent updates once we gather input on the proposal. Jianlin Lv (2): Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time Export irq_time_read for BPF module usage include/linux/filter.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++ kernel/sched/core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/sched/sched.h | 19 ------------------- 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time 2025-04-22 13:47 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Eliminate IRQ Time from BPF Program Running Duration Jianlin Lv @ 2025-04-22 13:47 ` Jianlin Lv 2025-04-22 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra ` (2 more replies) 2025-04-22 13:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/2] Export irq_time_read for BPF module usage Jianlin Lv 1 sibling, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Jianlin Lv @ 2025-04-22 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bpf Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, linux-kernel, iecedge, jianlv From: Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> This commit excludes IRQ time from the total execution duration of BPF programs. When CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is enabled, IRQ time is accounted for separately, offering a more accurate assessment of CPU usage for BPF programs. Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> --- include/linux/filter.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index f5cf4d35d83e..3e0f975176a6 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -703,12 +703,32 @@ static __always_inline u32 __bpf_prog_run(const struct bpf_prog *prog, cant_migrate(); if (static_branch_unlikely(&bpf_stats_enabled_key)) { struct bpf_prog_stats *stats; - u64 duration, start = sched_clock(); + u64 duration, start, start_time, end_time, irq_delta; unsigned long flags; + unsigned int cpu; - ret = dfunc(ctx, prog->insnsi, prog->bpf_func); + #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING + if (in_task()) { + cpu = get_cpu(); + put_cpu(); + start_time = irq_time_read(cpu); + } + #endif + start = sched_clock(); + ret = dfunc(ctx, prog->insnsi, prog->bpf_func); duration = sched_clock() - start; + + #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING + if (in_task()) { + end_time = irq_time_read(cpu); + if (end_time > start_time) { + irq_delta = end_time - start_time; + duration -= irq_delta; + } + } + #endif + stats = this_cpu_ptr(prog->stats); flags = u64_stats_update_begin_irqsave(&stats->syncp); u64_stats_inc(&stats->cnt); -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time 2025-04-22 13:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time Jianlin Lv @ 2025-04-22 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra 2025-04-22 17:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2025-04-23 5:31 ` kernel test robot 2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2025-04-22 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jianlin Lv Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, mingo, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, linux-kernel, jianlv On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 09:47:26PM +0800, Jianlin Lv wrote: > From: Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> > > This commit excludes IRQ time from the total execution duration of BPF > programs. When CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is enabled, IRQ time is > accounted for separately, offering a more accurate assessment of CPU > usage for BPF programs. > > Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> > --- > include/linux/filter.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h > index f5cf4d35d83e..3e0f975176a6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/filter.h > +++ b/include/linux/filter.h > @@ -703,12 +703,32 @@ static __always_inline u32 __bpf_prog_run(const struct bpf_prog *prog, > cant_migrate(); > if (static_branch_unlikely(&bpf_stats_enabled_key)) { > struct bpf_prog_stats *stats; > - u64 duration, start = sched_clock(); > + u64 duration, start, start_time, end_time, irq_delta; > unsigned long flags; > + unsigned int cpu; > > - ret = dfunc(ctx, prog->insnsi, prog->bpf_func); > + #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING > + if (in_task()) { > + cpu = get_cpu(); > + put_cpu(); > + start_time = irq_time_read(cpu); This is all sorts of daft.. you don't need get_cpu()/put_cpu(). > + } > + #endif > > + start = sched_clock(); > + ret = dfunc(ctx, prog->insnsi, prog->bpf_func); > duration = sched_clock() - start; > + > + #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING > + if (in_task()) { > + end_time = irq_time_read(cpu); > + if (end_time > start_time) { > + irq_delta = end_time - start_time; > + duration -= irq_delta; > + } > + } > + #endif This is really dodgy coding style. Please keep the preprocessor directives at column 0. What do you think about steal-time, do you want to remove that from your BPF runtime too? If so, perhaps expose the scheduler's clock_task, which does both things already? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time 2025-04-22 13:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time Jianlin Lv 2025-04-22 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra @ 2025-04-22 17:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2025-04-23 5:31 ` kernel test robot 2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2025-04-22 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jianlin Lv Cc: bpf, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Eduard, Song Liu, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh, Stanislav Fomichev, Hao Luo, Jiri Olsa, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Juri Lelli, Vincent Guittot, Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Benjamin Segall, Mel Gorman, Valentin Schneider, LKML, jianlv On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 6:47 AM Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> > > This commit excludes IRQ time from the total execution duration of BPF > programs. When CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is enabled, IRQ time is > accounted for separately, offering a more accurate assessment of CPU > usage for BPF programs. > > Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> > --- > include/linux/filter.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h > index f5cf4d35d83e..3e0f975176a6 100644 > --- a/include/linux/filter.h > +++ b/include/linux/filter.h > @@ -703,12 +703,32 @@ static __always_inline u32 __bpf_prog_run(const struct bpf_prog *prog, > cant_migrate(); > if (static_branch_unlikely(&bpf_stats_enabled_key)) { > struct bpf_prog_stats *stats; > - u64 duration, start = sched_clock(); > + u64 duration, start, start_time, end_time, irq_delta; > unsigned long flags; > + unsigned int cpu; > > - ret = dfunc(ctx, prog->insnsi, prog->bpf_func); > + #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING > + if (in_task()) { > + cpu = get_cpu(); > + put_cpu(); > + start_time = irq_time_read(cpu); > + } > + #endif > > + start = sched_clock(); > + ret = dfunc(ctx, prog->insnsi, prog->bpf_func); > duration = sched_clock() - start; > + > + #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING > + if (in_task()) { > + end_time = irq_time_read(cpu); > + if (end_time > start_time) { > + irq_delta = end_time - start_time; > + duration -= irq_delta; > + } > + } > + #endif > + This is way too much overhead. This timing loop is optimized to measure bpf prog runtime. See commit ce09cbdd9888 ("bpf: Improve program stats run-time calculation") IRQ can happen and distort the numbers, but you shouldn't be running with bpf_stats_enabled for a long time. You need to sample it instead. Every couple minutes turn it on for a second, capture the stats and aggregate over time. Filter out outliers due to IRQ or whatever. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time 2025-04-22 13:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time Jianlin Lv 2025-04-22 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra 2025-04-22 17:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov @ 2025-04-23 5:31 ` kernel test robot 2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: kernel test robot @ 2025-04-23 5:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jianlin Lv; +Cc: oe-kbuild-all Hi Jianlin, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jianlin-Lv/Enhance-BPF-execution-timing-by-excluding-IRQ-time/20250422-214957 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/73fdbbf9aafd3e24e12bb58f89c70959fb3a37f1.1745250534.git.iecedge%40gmail.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20250423 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250423/202504231319.Ruutd2WV-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250423/202504231319.Ruutd2WV-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504231319.Ruutd2WV-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from kernel/kallsyms.c:25: include/linux/filter.h: In function '__bpf_prog_run': >> include/linux/filter.h:708:30: warning: unused variable 'cpu' [-Wunused-variable] 708 | unsigned int cpu; | ^~~ >> include/linux/filter.h:706:60: warning: unused variable 'irq_delta' [-Wunused-variable] 706 | u64 duration, start, start_time, end_time, irq_delta; | ^~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/filter.h:706:50: warning: unused variable 'end_time' [-Wunused-variable] 706 | u64 duration, start, start_time, end_time, irq_delta; | ^~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/filter.h:706:38: warning: unused variable 'start_time' [-Wunused-variable] 706 | u64 duration, start, start_time, end_time, irq_delta; | ^~~~~~~~~~ At top level: cc1: note: unrecognized command-line option '-Wno-unterminated-string-initialization' may have been intended to silence earlier diagnostics vim +/cpu +708 include/linux/filter.h 686 687 extern struct mutex nf_conn_btf_access_lock; 688 extern int (*nfct_btf_struct_access)(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, 689 const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, 690 int off, int size); 691 692 typedef unsigned int (*bpf_dispatcher_fn)(const void *ctx, 693 const struct bpf_insn *insnsi, 694 unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const void *, 695 const struct bpf_insn *)); 696 697 static __always_inline u32 __bpf_prog_run(const struct bpf_prog *prog, 698 const void *ctx, 699 bpf_dispatcher_fn dfunc) 700 { 701 u32 ret; 702 703 cant_migrate(); 704 if (static_branch_unlikely(&bpf_stats_enabled_key)) { 705 struct bpf_prog_stats *stats; > 706 u64 duration, start, start_time, end_time, irq_delta; 707 unsigned long flags; > 708 unsigned int cpu; 709 710 #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING 711 if (in_task()) { 712 cpu = get_cpu(); 713 put_cpu(); 714 start_time = irq_time_read(cpu); 715 } 716 #endif 717 718 start = sched_clock(); 719 ret = dfunc(ctx, prog->insnsi, prog->bpf_func); 720 duration = sched_clock() - start; 721 722 #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING 723 if (in_task()) { 724 end_time = irq_time_read(cpu); 725 if (end_time > start_time) { 726 irq_delta = end_time - start_time; 727 duration -= irq_delta; 728 } 729 } 730 #endif 731 732 stats = this_cpu_ptr(prog->stats); 733 flags = u64_stats_update_begin_irqsave(&stats->syncp); 734 u64_stats_inc(&stats->cnt); 735 u64_stats_add(&stats->nsecs, duration); 736 u64_stats_update_end_irqrestore(&stats->syncp, flags); 737 } else { 738 ret = dfunc(ctx, prog->insnsi, prog->bpf_func); 739 } 740 return ret; 741 } 742 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/2] Export irq_time_read for BPF module usage 2025-04-22 13:47 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Eliminate IRQ Time from BPF Program Running Duration Jianlin Lv 2025-04-22 13:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time Jianlin Lv @ 2025-04-22 13:47 ` Jianlin Lv 2025-04-22 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jianlin Lv @ 2025-04-22 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bpf Cc: ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, mingo, peterz, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, linux-kernel, iecedge, jianlv From: Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> Move irq_time_read function to kernel/sched/core.c and export for external use when CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is enabled. Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> --- include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++ kernel/sched/core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/sched/sched.h | 19 ------------------- 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index f96ac1982893..3b83ac99b533 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -2281,4 +2281,8 @@ static __always_inline void alloc_tag_restore(struct alloc_tag *tag, struct allo #define alloc_tag_restore(_tag, _old) do {} while (0) #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING +extern inline u64 irq_time_read(int cpu); +#endif + #endif diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index cfaca3040b2f..c840d1ffdaca 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -10747,3 +10747,25 @@ void sched_enq_and_set_task(struct sched_enq_and_set_ctx *ctx) set_next_task(rq, ctx->p); } #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT */ + +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING +/* + * Returns the irqtime minus the softirq time computed by ksoftirqd. + * Otherwise ksoftirqd's sum_exec_runtime is subtracted its own runtime + * and never move forward. + */ +inline u64 irq_time_read(int cpu) +{ + struct irqtime *irqtime = &per_cpu(cpu_irqtime, cpu); + unsigned int seq; + u64 total; + + do { + seq = __u64_stats_fetch_begin(&irqtime->sync); + total = irqtime->total; + } while (__u64_stats_fetch_retry(&irqtime->sync, seq)); + + return total; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_time_read); +#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING */ diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 47972f34ea70..d2fd3772114e 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -3209,25 +3209,6 @@ static inline int irqtime_enabled(void) return sched_clock_irqtime; } -/* - * Returns the irqtime minus the softirq time computed by ksoftirqd. - * Otherwise ksoftirqd's sum_exec_runtime is subtracted its own runtime - * and never move forward. - */ -static inline u64 irq_time_read(int cpu) -{ - struct irqtime *irqtime = &per_cpu(cpu_irqtime, cpu); - unsigned int seq; - u64 total; - - do { - seq = __u64_stats_fetch_begin(&irqtime->sync); - total = irqtime->total; - } while (__u64_stats_fetch_retry(&irqtime->sync, seq)); - - return total; -} - #else static inline int irqtime_enabled(void) -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/2] Export irq_time_read for BPF module usage 2025-04-22 13:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/2] Export irq_time_read for BPF module usage Jianlin Lv @ 2025-04-22 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2025-04-22 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jianlin Lv Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, andrii, martin.lau, eddyz87, song, yonghong.song, john.fastabend, kpsingh, sdf, haoluo, jolsa, mingo, juri.lelli, vincent.guittot, dietmar.eggemann, rostedt, bsegall, mgorman, vschneid, linux-kernel, jianlv On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 09:47:27PM +0800, Jianlin Lv wrote: > From: Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> > > Move irq_time_read function to kernel/sched/core.c and export for > external use when CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING is enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv <iecedge@gmail.com> > --- > include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++ > kernel/sched/core.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > kernel/sched/sched.h | 19 ------------------- > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h > index f96ac1982893..3b83ac99b533 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sched.h > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h > @@ -2281,4 +2281,8 @@ static __always_inline void alloc_tag_restore(struct alloc_tag *tag, struct allo > #define alloc_tag_restore(_tag, _old) do {} while (0) > #endif > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING > +extern inline u64 irq_time_read(int cpu); > +#endif > + > #endif > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index cfaca3040b2f..c840d1ffdaca 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -10747,3 +10747,25 @@ void sched_enq_and_set_task(struct sched_enq_and_set_ctx *ctx) > set_next_task(rq, ctx->p); > } > #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_CLASS_EXT */ > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING > +/* > + * Returns the irqtime minus the softirq time computed by ksoftirqd. > + * Otherwise ksoftirqd's sum_exec_runtime is subtracted its own runtime > + * and never move forward. > + */ > +inline u64 irq_time_read(int cpu) > +{ > + struct irqtime *irqtime = &per_cpu(cpu_irqtime, cpu); > + unsigned int seq; > + u64 total; > + > + do { > + seq = __u64_stats_fetch_begin(&irqtime->sync); > + total = irqtime->total; > + } while (__u64_stats_fetch_retry(&irqtime->sync, seq)); > + > + return total; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_time_read); _GPL(), but as I've argued in the earlier email, I don't think you want this. I think you want access to clock_task instead. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-23 5:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-04-22 13:47 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Eliminate IRQ Time from BPF Program Running Duration Jianlin Lv 2025-04-22 13:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/2] Enhance BPF execution timing by excluding IRQ time Jianlin Lv 2025-04-22 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra 2025-04-22 17:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov 2025-04-23 5:31 ` kernel test robot 2025-04-22 13:47 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/2] Export irq_time_read for BPF module usage Jianlin Lv 2025-04-22 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.