All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "crypto: run initcalls for generic implementations earlier"
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:41:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250429164100.GA1743@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBBoqm4u6ufapUXK@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 01:50:34PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/crypto/chacha-glue.c b/arch/arm/lib/crypto/chacha-glue.c
> index 12afb40cf1ff..eb73ff0eaf2e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/crypto/chacha-glue.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/crypto/chacha-glue.c
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static int __init chacha_arm_mod_init(void)
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -arch_initcall(chacha_arm_mod_init);
> +module_init(chacha_arm_mod_init);

arch/*/lib/ should be kept at arch_initcall.  It makes sense (it's arch/ code);
it's library code with no dependencies on any other initcalls; and it can be
used during initialization of other modules, notably with crypto/ depending on
*_is_arch_optimized().  I understand that this patch sets the initcall level
conditionally depending on whether each individual file uses static keys in
*_is_arch_optimized() or not, but there's no need to add that complexity.  Just
use arch_initcall.  (And FWIW I'll keep doing that arch/*/lib/crc*.c, even if
you decide to mess up arch/*/lib/crypto/.)

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-29 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-29  5:50 [PATCH 1/1] Revert "crypto: run initcalls for generic implementations earlier" Herbert Xu
2025-04-29 16:41 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-04-30  2:21   ` Herbert Xu
2025-04-30  3:16     ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-30  3:18       ` Herbert Xu
2025-04-30  8:17 ` [v2 PATCH] " Herbert Xu
2025-04-30 17:52   ` Eric Biggers
2025-06-05 14:29   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-06-09  9:44     ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250429164100.GA1743@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.