From: Jared Holzman <jholzman@nvidia.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, ushankar@purestorage.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jholzman@nvidia.com
Subject: [PATCH 6.14.y v2 5/7] ublk: remove __ublk_quiesce_dev()
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 12:47:00 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250507094702.73459-6-jholzman@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250507094702.73459-1-jholzman@nvidia.com>
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 736b005b413a172670711ee17cab3c8ccab83223 ]
Remove __ublk_quiesce_dev() and open code for updating device state as
QUIESCED.
We needn't to drain inflight requests in __ublk_quiesce_dev() any more,
because all inflight requests are aborted in ublk char device release
handler.
Also we needn't to set ->canceling in __ublk_quiesce_dev() any more
because it is done unconditionally now in ublk_ch_release().
Reviewed-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250416035444.99569-7-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 19 ++-----------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 652742db0396..c3f576a9dbf2 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -205,7 +205,6 @@ struct ublk_params_header {
static void ublk_stop_dev_unlocked(struct ublk_device *ub);
static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq);
-static void __ublk_quiesce_dev(struct ublk_device *ub);
static inline unsigned int ublk_req_build_flags(struct request *req);
static inline struct ublksrv_io_desc *ublk_get_iod(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
@@ -1558,7 +1557,8 @@ static int ublk_ch_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
ublk_stop_dev_unlocked(ub);
} else {
if (ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io(ub)) {
- __ublk_quiesce_dev(ub);
+ /* ->canceling is set and all requests are aborted */
+ ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_QUIESCED;
} else {
ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_FAIL_IO;
for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++)
@@ -1804,21 +1804,6 @@ static void ublk_wait_tagset_rqs_idle(struct ublk_device *ub)
}
}
-static void __ublk_quiesce_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
-{
- int i;
-
- pr_devel("%s: quiesce ub: dev_id %d state %s\n",
- __func__, ub->dev_info.dev_id,
- ub->dev_info.state == UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE ?
- "LIVE" : "QUIESCED");
- /* mark every queue as canceling */
- for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++)
- ublk_get_queue(ub, i)->canceling = true;
- ublk_wait_tagset_rqs_idle(ub);
- ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_QUIESCED;
-}
-
static void ublk_force_abort_dev(struct ublk_device *ub)
{
int i;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-07 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-07 9:46 [PATCH 6.14.y v2 0/7] ublk: fix race between io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task and ublk_cancel_cmd Jared Holzman
2025-05-07 9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 1/7] ublk: add helper of ublk_need_map_io() Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:17 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 2/7] ublk: properly serialize all FETCH_REQs Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:18 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 3/7] ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release() Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:19 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 4/7] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:19 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 9:47 ` Jared Holzman [this message]
2025-05-08 16:17 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 5/7] ublk: remove __ublk_quiesce_dev() Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 9:47 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 6/7] ublk: simplify aborting ublk request Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:18 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 9:47 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 7/7] ublk: fix race between io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task and ublk_cancel_cmd Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:17 ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 11:18 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 0/7] " Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250507094702.73459-6-jholzman@nvidia.com \
--to=jholzman@nvidia.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.