All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jared Holzman <jholzman@nvidia.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, ushankar@purestorage.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jholzman@nvidia.com
Subject: [PATCH 6.14.y v2 7/7] ublk: fix race between io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task and ublk_cancel_cmd
Date: Wed,  7 May 2025 12:47:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250507094702.73459-8-jholzman@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250507094702.73459-1-jholzman@nvidia.com>

From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit f40139fde5278d81af3227444fd6e76a76b9506d ]

ublk_cancel_cmd() calls io_uring_cmd_done() to complete uring_cmd, but
we may have scheduled task work via io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task() for
dispatching request, then kernel crash can be triggered.

Fix it by not trying to canceling the command if ublk block request is
started.

Fixes: 216c8f5ef0f2 ("ublk: replace monitor with cancelable uring_cmd")
Reported-by: Jared Holzman <jholzman@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Jared Holzman <jholzman@nvidia.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/d2179120-171b-47ba-b664-23242981ef19@nvidia.com/
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250425013742.1079549-3-ming.lei@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 6000147ac2a5..348c4feb7a2d 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1655,14 +1655,31 @@ static void ublk_start_cancel(struct ublk_queue *ubq)
 	ublk_put_disk(disk);
 }
 
-static void ublk_cancel_cmd(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io,
+static void ublk_cancel_cmd(struct ublk_queue *ubq, unsigned tag,
 		unsigned int issue_flags)
 {
+	struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[tag];
+	struct ublk_device *ub = ubq->dev;
+	struct request *req;
 	bool done;
 
 	if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE))
 		return;
 
+	/*
+	 * Don't try to cancel this command if the request is started for
+	 * avoiding race between io_uring_cmd_done() and
+	 * io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task().
+	 *
+	 * Either the started request will be aborted via __ublk_abort_rq(),
+	 * then this uring_cmd is canceled next time, or it will be done in
+	 * task work function ublk_dispatch_req() because io_uring guarantees
+	 * that ublk_dispatch_req() is always called
+	 */
+	req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(ub->tag_set.tags[ubq->q_id], tag);
+	if (req && blk_mq_request_started(req))
+		return;
+
 	spin_lock(&ubq->cancel_lock);
 	done = !!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_CANCELED);
 	if (!done)
@@ -1694,7 +1711,6 @@ static void ublk_uring_cmd_cancel_fn(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 	struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu *pdu = ublk_get_uring_cmd_pdu(cmd);
 	struct ublk_queue *ubq = pdu->ubq;
 	struct task_struct *task;
-	struct ublk_io *io;
 
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ubq))
 		return;
@@ -1709,9 +1725,8 @@ static void ublk_uring_cmd_cancel_fn(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 	if (!ubq->canceling)
 		ublk_start_cancel(ubq);
 
-	io = &ubq->ios[pdu->tag];
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(io->cmd != cmd);
-	ublk_cancel_cmd(ubq, io, issue_flags);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(ubq->ios[pdu->tag].cmd != cmd);
+	ublk_cancel_cmd(ubq, pdu->tag, issue_flags);
 }
 
 static inline bool ublk_queue_ready(struct ublk_queue *ubq)
@@ -1724,7 +1739,7 @@ static void ublk_cancel_queue(struct ublk_queue *ubq)
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ubq->q_depth; i++)
-		ublk_cancel_cmd(ubq, &ubq->ios[i], IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED);
+		ublk_cancel_cmd(ubq, i, IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED);
 }
 
 /* Cancel all pending commands, must be called after del_gendisk() returns */
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-07  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-07  9:46 [PATCH 6.14.y v2 0/7] ublk: fix race between io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task and ublk_cancel_cmd Jared Holzman
2025-05-07  9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 1/7] ublk: add helper of ublk_need_map_io() Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:17   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07  9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 2/7] ublk: properly serialize all FETCH_REQs Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:18   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07  9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 3/7] ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release() Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:19   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07  9:46 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 4/7] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:19   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07  9:47 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 5/7] ublk: remove __ublk_quiesce_dev() Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:17   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07  9:47 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 6/7] ublk: simplify aborting ublk request Jared Holzman
2025-05-08 16:18   ` Sasha Levin
2025-05-07  9:47 ` Jared Holzman [this message]
2025-05-08 16:17   ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 7/7] ublk: fix race between io_uring_cmd_complete_in_task and ublk_cancel_cmd Sasha Levin
2025-05-07 11:18 ` [PATCH 6.14.y v2 0/7] " Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250507094702.73459-8-jholzman@nvidia.com \
    --to=jholzman@nvidia.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.