* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review
2025-05-08 11:30 [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-05-08 12:46 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-05-08 13:57 ` Peter Schneider
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-05-08 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
Björn Töpel, Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter,
Arnd Bergmann, Palmer Dabbelt, linux-riscv
On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 17:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.90 release.
> There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 10 May 2025 11:25:47 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.90-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Regressions on riscv with allyesconfig and allmodconfig builds failed with
clang-20 and gcc-13 toolchain on the stable-rc 6.6.90-rc1 and 6.6.90-rc2
* riscv, build
- clang-20-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allyesconfig
Regression Analysis:
- New regression? Yes
- Reproducibility? Yes
Build regression: riscv uprobes.c unused variable 'start'
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build error riscv
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_copy_ixol':
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:170:23: error: unused variable
'start' [-Werror=unused-variable]
170 | unsigned long start = (unsigned long)dst;
| ^~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
## Build riscv
* Build log: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08/testrun/28376898/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allmodconfig/log
* Build history:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08/testrun/28376898/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allmodconfig/history/
* Build details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08/testrun/28376898/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allmodconfig/details/
* Build link: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2woO9vttziZGlSKcBdoVu2LZm8Q/
* Kernel config:
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2woO9vttziZGlSKcBdoVu2LZm8Q/config
* Toolchain: gcc-13 and clang-20
## Steps to reproduce
- tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch riscv --toolchain gcc-13
--kconfig allmodconfig
## Build
* kernel: 6.6.90-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: a7b3b5860e08c3b29b4a004562b9691d7c25a2f3
* git describe: v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.87-586-gda7333f263c3)
* riscv, build
- clang-20-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allyesconfig
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.6.87-586-gda7333f263c3)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.6.87-586-gda7333f263c3)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.6.87-586-gda7333f263c3)
## Test result summary
total: 112131, pass: 91642, fail: 4421, skip: 15654, xfail: 414
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 129 total, 129 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 44 total, 44 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 27 total, 20 passed, 7 failed
* mips: 26 total, 22 passed, 4 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 31 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 20 total, 17 passed, 3 failed
* s390: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 7 total, 7 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 37 total, 33 passed, 4 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review
@ 2025-05-08 12:46 ` Naresh Kamboju
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2025-05-08 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
Björn Töpel, Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter,
Arnd Bergmann, Palmer Dabbelt, linux-riscv
On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 17:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.90 release.
> There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 10 May 2025 11:25:47 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.90-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Regressions on riscv with allyesconfig and allmodconfig builds failed with
clang-20 and gcc-13 toolchain on the stable-rc 6.6.90-rc1 and 6.6.90-rc2
* riscv, build
- clang-20-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allyesconfig
Regression Analysis:
- New regression? Yes
- Reproducibility? Yes
Build regression: riscv uprobes.c unused variable 'start'
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build error riscv
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_copy_ixol':
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:170:23: error: unused variable
'start' [-Werror=unused-variable]
170 | unsigned long start = (unsigned long)dst;
| ^~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
## Build riscv
* Build log: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08/testrun/28376898/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allmodconfig/log
* Build history:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08/testrun/28376898/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allmodconfig/history/
* Build details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08/testrun/28376898/suite/build/test/gcc-13-allmodconfig/details/
* Build link: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2woO9vttziZGlSKcBdoVu2LZm8Q/
* Kernel config:
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2woO9vttziZGlSKcBdoVu2LZm8Q/config
* Toolchain: gcc-13 and clang-20
## Steps to reproduce
- tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch riscv --toolchain gcc-13
--kconfig allmodconfig
## Build
* kernel: 6.6.90-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: a7b3b5860e08c3b29b4a004562b9691d7c25a2f3
* git describe: v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.89-130-ga7b3b5860e08
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.6.87-586-gda7333f263c3)
* riscv, build
- clang-20-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allmodconfig
- gcc-13-allyesconfig
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.6.87-586-gda7333f263c3)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.6.87-586-gda7333f263c3)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.6.87-586-gda7333f263c3)
## Test result summary
total: 112131, pass: 91642, fail: 4421, skip: 15654, xfail: 414
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 129 total, 129 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 44 total, 44 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 27 total, 20 passed, 7 failed
* mips: 26 total, 22 passed, 4 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 32 total, 31 passed, 1 failed
* riscv: 20 total, 17 passed, 3 failed
* s390: 14 total, 13 passed, 1 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 7 total, 7 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 37 total, 33 passed, 4 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* lava
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review
2025-05-08 12:46 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-05-09 6:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-05-09 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
Björn Töpel, Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter,
Arnd Bergmann, Palmer Dabbelt, linux-riscv
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 06:16:12PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 17:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.90 release.
> > There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 10 May 2025 11:25:47 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.90-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Regressions on riscv with allyesconfig and allmodconfig builds failed with
> clang-20 and gcc-13 toolchain on the stable-rc 6.6.90-rc1 and 6.6.90-rc2
>
> * riscv, build
> - clang-20-allmodconfig
> - gcc-13-allmodconfig
> - gcc-13-allyesconfig
>
> Regression Analysis:
> - New regression? Yes
> - Reproducibility? Yes
>
> Build regression: riscv uprobes.c unused variable 'start'
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> ## Build error riscv
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_copy_ixol':
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:170:23: error: unused variable
> 'start' [-Werror=unused-variable]
> 170 | unsigned long start = (unsigned long)dst;
> | ^~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Oh that's wierd. riscv defines flush_icache_range() as "empty" so then
this patch does nothing in these older kernels. Ah, it's an inline
function in newer kernel trees as well so that the build warning isn't
there anymore.
As this change feels odd for 6.6 and older kernels, AND it's causing
build warnings, I'm just going to drop it and if the riscv maintainers
really want it applied to these trees, will take a working backport from
them.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review
@ 2025-05-09 6:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2025-05-09 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
Björn Töpel, Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter,
Arnd Bergmann, Palmer Dabbelt, linux-riscv
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 06:16:12PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 17:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.90 release.
> > There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 10 May 2025 11:25:47 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.90-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Regressions on riscv with allyesconfig and allmodconfig builds failed with
> clang-20 and gcc-13 toolchain on the stable-rc 6.6.90-rc1 and 6.6.90-rc2
>
> * riscv, build
> - clang-20-allmodconfig
> - gcc-13-allmodconfig
> - gcc-13-allyesconfig
>
> Regression Analysis:
> - New regression? Yes
> - Reproducibility? Yes
>
> Build regression: riscv uprobes.c unused variable 'start'
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> ## Build error riscv
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_copy_ixol':
> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:170:23: error: unused variable
> 'start' [-Werror=unused-variable]
> 170 | unsigned long start = (unsigned long)dst;
> | ^~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Oh that's wierd. riscv defines flush_icache_range() as "empty" so then
this patch does nothing in these older kernels. Ah, it's an inline
function in newer kernel trees as well so that the build warning isn't
there anymore.
As this change feels odd for 6.6 and older kernels, AND it's causing
build warnings, I'm just going to drop it and if the riscv maintainers
really want it applied to these trees, will take a working backport from
them.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review
2025-05-09 6:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2025-05-09 6:46 ` Ron Economos
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-05-09 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
Björn Töpel, Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter,
Arnd Bergmann, Palmer Dabbelt, linux-riscv
On 5/8/25 23:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 06:16:12PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 17:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.90 release.
>>> There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sat, 10 May 2025 11:25:47 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.90-rc2.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>> Regressions on riscv with allyesconfig and allmodconfig builds failed with
>> clang-20 and gcc-13 toolchain on the stable-rc 6.6.90-rc1 and 6.6.90-rc2
>>
>> * riscv, build
>> - clang-20-allmodconfig
>> - gcc-13-allmodconfig
>> - gcc-13-allyesconfig
>>
>> Regression Analysis:
>> - New regression? Yes
>> - Reproducibility? Yes
>>
>> Build regression: riscv uprobes.c unused variable 'start'
>>
>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>>
>> ## Build error riscv
>> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_copy_ixol':
>> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:170:23: error: unused variable
>> 'start' [-Werror=unused-variable]
>> 170 | unsigned long start = (unsigned long)dst;
>> | ^~~~~
>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> Oh that's wierd. riscv defines flush_icache_range() as "empty" so then
> this patch does nothing in these older kernels. Ah, it's an inline
> function in newer kernel trees as well so that the build warning isn't
> there anymore.
>
> As this change feels odd for 6.6 and older kernels, AND it's causing
> build warnings, I'm just going to drop it and if the riscv maintainers
> really want it applied to these trees, will take a working backport from
> them.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
This is the same build failure from last week. There's a fixup patch
"riscv: Replace function-like macro by static inline function" upstream
commit 121f34341d396b666d8a90b24768b40e08ca0d61 that doesn't apply to
6.6, 6.1 and 5.15.
You dropped the patch "riscv: uprobes: Add missing fence.i after
building the XOL buffer" last week, but it snuck back in this week.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review
@ 2025-05-09 6:46 ` Ron Economos
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2025-05-09 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Naresh Kamboju
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
Björn Töpel, Anders Roxell, Dan Carpenter,
Arnd Bergmann, Palmer Dabbelt, linux-riscv
On 5/8/25 23:19, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 06:16:12PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 17:00, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.90 release.
>>> There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Sat, 10 May 2025 11:25:47 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.90-rc2.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>> Regressions on riscv with allyesconfig and allmodconfig builds failed with
>> clang-20 and gcc-13 toolchain on the stable-rc 6.6.90-rc1 and 6.6.90-rc2
>>
>> * riscv, build
>> - clang-20-allmodconfig
>> - gcc-13-allmodconfig
>> - gcc-13-allyesconfig
>>
>> Regression Analysis:
>> - New regression? Yes
>> - Reproducibility? Yes
>>
>> Build regression: riscv uprobes.c unused variable 'start'
>>
>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>>
>> ## Build error riscv
>> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c: In function 'arch_uprobe_copy_ixol':
>> arch/riscv/kernel/probes/uprobes.c:170:23: error: unused variable
>> 'start' [-Werror=unused-variable]
>> 170 | unsigned long start = (unsigned long)dst;
>> | ^~~~~
>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> Oh that's wierd. riscv defines flush_icache_range() as "empty" so then
> this patch does nothing in these older kernels. Ah, it's an inline
> function in newer kernel trees as well so that the build warning isn't
> there anymore.
>
> As this change feels odd for 6.6 and older kernels, AND it's causing
> build warnings, I'm just going to drop it and if the riscv maintainers
> really want it applied to these trees, will take a working backport from
> them.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
This is the same build failure from last week. There's a fixup patch
"riscv: Replace function-like macro by static inline function" upstream
commit 121f34341d396b666d8a90b24768b40e08ca0d61 that doesn't apply to
6.6, 6.1 and 5.15.
You dropped the patch "riscv: uprobes: Add missing fence.i after
building the XOL buffer" last week, but it snuck back in this week.
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review
2025-05-08 11:30 [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-08 12:46 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2025-05-08 13:57 ` Peter Schneider
2025-05-08 15:00 ` Ryan Matthews
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Peter Schneider @ 2025-05-08 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
Am 08.05.2025 um 13:30 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.90 release.
> There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds, boots and works on my 2-socket Ivy Bridge Xeon E5-2697 v2 server. No dmesg
oddities or regressions found.
Tested-by: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>
Beste Grüße,
Peter Schneider
--
Climb the mountain not to plant your flag, but to embrace the challenge,
enjoy the air and behold the view. Climb it so you can see the world,
not so the world can see you. -- David McCullough Jr.
OpenPGP: 0xA3828BD796CCE11A8CADE8866E3A92C92C3FF244
Download: https://www.peters-netzplatz.de/download/pschneider1968_pub.asc
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@googlemail.com
https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=pschneider1968@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review
2025-05-08 11:30 [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-05-08 12:46 ` Naresh Kamboju
2025-05-08 13:57 ` Peter Schneider
@ 2025-05-08 15:00 ` Ryan Matthews
2025-05-08 17:00 ` Miguel Ojeda
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Matthews @ 2025-05-08 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw,
rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie
On Thu, May 8, 2025, at 07:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.90 release.
> There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Builds and boots successfully on an ARM i.MX7D board.
Tested-by: Ryan Matthews <ryanmatthews@fastmail.com>
-- Ryan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review
2025-05-08 11:30 [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-05-08 15:00 ` Ryan Matthews
@ 2025-05-08 17:00 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-08 17:41 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-10 1:24 ` Mark Brown
5 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2025-05-08 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: akpm, broonie, conor, f.fainelli, hargar, jonathanh, linux-kernel,
linux, lkft-triage, patches, patches, pavel, rwarsow, shuah, srw,
stable, sudipm.mukherjee, torvalds, Miguel Ojeda
On Thu, 08 May 2025 13:30:36 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.90 release.
> There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 10 May 2025 11:25:47 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64:
Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review
2025-05-08 11:30 [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-05-08 17:00 ` Miguel Ojeda
@ 2025-05-08 17:41 ` Jon Hunter
2025-05-10 1:24 ` Mark Brown
5 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2025-05-08 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar, broonie,
linux-tegra, stable
On Thu, 08 May 2025 13:30:36 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.90 release.
> There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 10 May 2025 11:25:47 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.90-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.6:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.6.90-rc2-ga7b3b5860e08
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra186-p3509-0000+p3636-0001, tegra194-p2972-0000,
tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review
2025-05-08 11:30 [PATCH 6.6 000/129] 6.6.90-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-05-08 17:41 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2025-05-10 1:24 ` Mark Brown
5 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2025-05-10 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, hargar
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 345 bytes --]
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 01:30:36PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.90 release.
> There are 129 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread