[merged mm-stable] memcg-introduce-memcg_uncharge.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged mm-stable] memcg-introduce-memcg_uncharge.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: memcg: introduce memcg_uncharge
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     memcg-introduce-memcg_uncharge.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Subject: memcg: introduce memcg_uncharge
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 18:39:07 -0700

At multiple places in memcontrol.c, the memory and memsw page counters are
being uncharged.  This is error-prone.  Let's move the functionality to a
newly introduced memcg_uncharge and call it from all those places.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250404013913.1663035-4-shakeel.butt@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/memcontrol.c |   28 ++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-introduce-memcg_uncharge
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1822,6 +1822,13 @@ static bool consume_stock(struct mem_cgr
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void memcg_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
+{
+	page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages);
+	if (do_memsw_account())
+		page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, nr_pages);
+}
+
 /*
  * Returns stocks cached in percpu and reset cached information.
  */
@@ -1834,10 +1841,7 @@ static void drain_stock(struct memcg_sto
 		return;
 
 	if (stock_pages) {
-		page_counter_uncharge(&old->memory, stock_pages);
-		if (do_memsw_account())
-			page_counter_uncharge(&old->memsw, stock_pages);
-
+		memcg_uncharge(old, stock_pages);
 		WRITE_ONCE(stock->nr_pages, 0);
 	}
 
@@ -1900,9 +1904,7 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgro
 		 * In case of unlikely failure to lock percpu stock_lock
 		 * uncharge memcg directly.
 		 */
-		page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages);
-		if (do_memsw_account())
-			page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, nr_pages);
+		memcg_uncharge(memcg, nr_pages);
 		return;
 	}
 	__refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages);
@@ -2876,12 +2878,8 @@ static struct obj_cgroup *drain_obj_stoc
 
 			mod_memcg_state(memcg, MEMCG_KMEM, -nr_pages);
 			memcg1_account_kmem(memcg, -nr_pages);
-			if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) {
-				page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages);
-				if (do_memsw_account())
-					page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw,
-							      nr_pages);
-			}
+			if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
+				memcg_uncharge(memcg, nr_pages);
 
 			css_put(&memcg->css);
 		}
@@ -4702,9 +4700,7 @@ static inline void uncharge_gather_clear
 static void uncharge_batch(const struct uncharge_gather *ug)
 {
 	if (ug->nr_memory) {
-		page_counter_uncharge(&ug->memcg->memory, ug->nr_memory);
-		if (do_memsw_account())
-			page_counter_uncharge(&ug->memcg->memsw, ug->nr_memory);
+		memcg_uncharge(ug->memcg, ug->nr_memory);
 		if (ug->nr_kmem) {
 			mod_memcg_state(ug->memcg, MEMCG_KMEM, -ug->nr_kmem);
 			memcg1_account_kmem(ug->memcg, -ug->nr_kmem);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from shakeel.butt@linux.dev are

memcg-introduce-non-blocking-limit-setting-option.patch
memcg-introduce-non-blocking-limit-setting-option-v3.patch
memcg-simplify-consume_stock.patch
memcg-separate-local_trylock-for-memcg-and-obj.patch
memcg-completely-decouple-memcg-and-obj-stocks.patch
memcg-no-irq-disable-for-memcg-stock-lock.patch