All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/13] crypto: s390/sha256 - implement library instead of shash
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 17:37:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250529173702.GA3840196@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250529110526.6d2959a9.alex.williamson@redhat.com>

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 11:05:26AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:00:33 -0700
> Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > 
> > Instead of providing crypto_shash algorithms for the arch-optimized
> > SHA-256 code, instead implement the SHA-256 library.  This is much
> > simpler, it makes the SHA-256 library functions be arch-optimized, and
> > it fixes the longstanding issue where the arch-optimized SHA-256 was
> > disabled by default.  SHA-256 still remains available through
> > crypto_shash, but individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
> 
> I can get to the following error after this patch, now merged as commit
> b9eac03edcf8 ("crypto: s390/sha256 - implement library instead of shash"):
> 
> error: the following would cause module name conflict:
>   crypto/sha256.ko
>   arch/s390/lib/crypto/sha256.ko

Thanks for reporting this.  For now the s390 one should be renamed to
sha256-s390, similar to how the other architectures' sha256 modules are named.
I'll send a patch.

Long-term, I'd like to find a clean way to consolidate the library code for each
algorithm into a single module.  So instead of e.g. libsha256.ko,
libsha256-generic.ko, and sha256-s390.ko (all of which get loaded when the
SHA-256 library is needed), we'd just have libsha256.ko.  (Or just sha256.ko,
with the old-school crypto API one renamed to sha256-cryptoapi.ko.)  A lot of
these weird build problems we've been having are caused by the unnecessary
separation into multiple modules.

- Eric

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/13] crypto: s390/sha256 - implement library instead of shash
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 17:37:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250529173702.GA3840196@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250529110526.6d2959a9.alex.williamson@redhat.com>

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 11:05:26AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:00:33 -0700
> Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> > 
> > Instead of providing crypto_shash algorithms for the arch-optimized
> > SHA-256 code, instead implement the SHA-256 library.  This is much
> > simpler, it makes the SHA-256 library functions be arch-optimized, and
> > it fixes the longstanding issue where the arch-optimized SHA-256 was
> > disabled by default.  SHA-256 still remains available through
> > crypto_shash, but individual architectures no longer need to handle it.
> 
> I can get to the following error after this patch, now merged as commit
> b9eac03edcf8 ("crypto: s390/sha256 - implement library instead of shash"):
> 
> error: the following would cause module name conflict:
>   crypto/sha256.ko
>   arch/s390/lib/crypto/sha256.ko

Thanks for reporting this.  For now the s390 one should be renamed to
sha256-s390, similar to how the other architectures' sha256 modules are named.
I'll send a patch.

Long-term, I'd like to find a clean way to consolidate the library code for each
algorithm into a single module.  So instead of e.g. libsha256.ko,
libsha256-generic.ko, and sha256-s390.ko (all of which get loaded when the
SHA-256 library is needed), we'd just have libsha256.ko.  (Or just sha256.ko,
with the old-school crypto API one renamed to sha256-cryptoapi.ko.)  A lot of
these weird build problems we've been having are caused by the unnecessary
separation into multiple modules.

- Eric

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-29 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-28 17:00 [PATCH v4 00/13] Architecture-optimized SHA-256 library API Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] crypto: sha256 - support arch-optimized lib and expose through shash Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-30  3:48   ` Herbert Xu
2025-04-30  3:48     ` Herbert Xu
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] crypto: arm/sha256 - implement library instead of shash Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] crypto: arm64/sha256 - remove obsolete chunking logic Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] crypto: arm64/sha256 - implement library instead of shash Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] crypto: mips/sha256 " Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] crypto: powerpc/sha256 " Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] crypto: riscv/sha256 " Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-08 17:45   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2025-05-08 17:45     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2025-05-08 18:06     ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-08 18:06       ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] crypto: s390/sha256 " Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-29 17:05   ` Alex Williamson
2025-05-29 17:05     ` Alex Williamson
2025-05-29 17:37     ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-05-29 17:37       ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-29 19:00       ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-29 19:00         ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-29 20:14       ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-29 20:14         ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-29 21:16         ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-29 21:16           ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-29 23:54           ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-29 23:54             ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-30  0:18             ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-30  0:18               ` Eric Biggers
2025-06-01 23:00               ` Eric Biggers
2025-06-01 23:00                 ` Eric Biggers
2025-06-02 14:45                 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-02 14:45                   ` Linus Torvalds
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] crypto: sparc - move opcodes.h into asm directory Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] crypto: sparc/sha256 - implement library instead of shash Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] crypto: x86/sha256 " Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] crypto: sha256 - remove sha256_base.h Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] crypto: lib/sha256 - improve function prototypes Eric Biggers
2025-04-28 17:00   ` Eric Biggers
2025-05-05 12:24 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] Architecture-optimized SHA-256 library API Herbert Xu
2025-05-05 12:24   ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250529173702.GA3840196@google.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.