* + xarray-add-a-bug_on-to-ensure-caller-is-not-sibling.patch added to mm-unstable branch
@ 2025-06-10 21:11 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2025-06-10 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, ziy, willy, ryan.roberts, david, anshuman.khandual,
aneesh.kumar, dev.jain, akpm
The patch titled
Subject: xarray: add a BUG_ON() to ensure caller is not sibling
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch. Its filename is
xarray-add-a-bug_on-to-ensure-caller-is-not-sibling.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/xarray-add-a-bug_on-to-ensure-caller-is-not-sibling.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Subject: xarray: add a BUG_ON() to ensure caller is not sibling
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 09:45:33 +0530
Suppose xas is pointing somewhere near the end of the multi-entry batch.
Then it may happen that the computed slot already falls beyond the batch,
thus breaking the loop due to !xa_is_sibling(), and computing the wrong
order.
For example, suppose we have a shift-6 node having an order-9 entry => 8 -
1 = 7 siblings, so assume the slots are at offset 0 till 7 in this node.
If xas->xa_offset is 6, then the code will compute order as 1 +
xas->xa_node->shift = 7. Therefore, the order computation must start from
the beginning of the multi-slot entries, that is, the non-sibling entry.
Thus ensure that the caller is aware of this by triggering a BUG when the
entry is a sibling entry. Note that this BUG_ON() is only active while
running selftests, so there is no overhead in a running kernel.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250604041533.91198-1-dev.jain@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
lib/xarray.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/lib/xarray.c~xarray-add-a-bug_on-to-ensure-caller-is-not-sibling
+++ a/lib/xarray.c
@@ -1910,6 +1910,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xa_store_range);
* @xas: XArray operation state.
*
* Called after xas_load, the xas should not be in an error state.
+ * The xas should not be pointing to a sibling entry.
*
* Return: A number between 0 and 63 indicating the order of the entry.
*/
@@ -1920,6 +1921,8 @@ int xas_get_order(struct xa_state *xas)
if (!xas->xa_node)
return 0;
+ XA_NODE_BUG_ON(xas->xa_node, xa_is_sibling(xa_entry(xas->xa,
+ xas->xa_node, xas->xa_offset)));
for (;;) {
unsigned int slot = xas->xa_offset + (1 << order);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from dev.jain@arm.com are
xarray-add-a-bug_on-to-ensure-caller-is-not-sibling.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-06-10 21:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-10 21:11 + xarray-add-a-bug_on-to-ensure-caller-is-not-sibling.patch added to mm-unstable branch Andrew Morton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.