All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: rockchip: Use standard PCIe defines
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:14:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250613201409.GA973486@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <992ab6278af59b8f2f82521bf4611f69a916bbe1.1749827015.git.geraldogabriel@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 12:05:31PM -0300, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> Current code uses custom-defined register offsets
> and bitfields for standard PCIe registers. Change
> to using standard PCIe defines.

Wrap to fill 75 columns so there's space for "git log" to add
indentation.

> @@ -40,18 +40,18 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_enable_bw_int(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  {
>  	u32 status;
>  
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  	status |= (PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LBMIE | PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LABIE);
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  }
>  
>  static void rockchip_pcie_clr_bw_int(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  {
>  	u32 status;
>  
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  	status |= (PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LBMS | PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LABS) << 16;

It looks funny to write PCI_EXP_LNKCTL with bits from PCI_EXP_LNKSTA.
I guess this is because rockchip_pcie_write() does 32-bit writes, but
PCI_EXP_LNKCTL and PCI_EXP_LNKSTA are adjacent 16-bit registers.

If the hardware supports it, adding rockchip_pcie_readw() and
rockchip_pcie_writew() for 16-bit accesses would make this read
better.

Hopefully the hardware *does* support this (it's required per spec at
least for config accesses, which would be a different path in the
hardware).  Doing the 32-bit write of PCI_EXP_LNKCTL above is
problematic because writes PCI_EXP_LNKSTA as well, and PCI_EXP_LNKSTA
includes some RW1C bits that may be unintentionally cleared.

> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  }
>  
>  static void rockchip_pcie_update_txcredit_mui(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_set_power_limit(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  	scale = 3; /* 0.001x */
>  	curr = curr / 1000; /* convert to mA */
>  	power = (curr * 3300) / 1000; /* milliwatt */
> -	while (power > PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CSPL_LIMIT) {
> +	while (power > FIELD_MAX(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL)) {
>  		if (!scale) {
>  			dev_warn(rockchip->dev, "invalid power supply\n");
>  			return;
> @@ -278,10 +278,10 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_set_power_limit(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  		power = power / 10;
>  	}
>  
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR);
> -	status |= (power << PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CSPL_SHIFT) |
> -		  (scale << PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CPLS_SHIFT);
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP);
> +	status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL, power);
> +	status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_SCL, scale);

This assumes the value you read from PCI_EXP_DEVCAP had zeroes in
these bits.  It might, but it would look safer to do:

  status &= ~(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL | PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_SCL);
  status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL, power);
  status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_SCL, scale);

> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP);
>  }

>  /**
> @@ -309,14 +309,14 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  	rockchip_pcie_set_power_limit(rockchip);
>  
>  	/* Set RC's clock architecture as common clock */
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  	status |= PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_SLC << 16;
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  
>  	/* Set RC's RCB to 128 */
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  	status |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RCB;
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  
>  	/* Enable Gen1 training */
>  	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_LINK_TRAIN_ENABLE,
> @@ -341,9 +341,9 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  		 * Enable retrain for gen2. This should be configured only after
>  		 * gen1 finished.
>  		 */
> -		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  		status |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL;
> -		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  
>  		err = readl_poll_timeout(rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_CORE_CTRL,
>  					 status, PCIE_LINK_IS_GEN2(status), 20,
> @@ -380,15 +380,15 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  
>  	/* Clear L0s from RC's link cap */
>  	if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "aspm-no-l0s")) {
> -		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP);
> -		status &= ~PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP_L0S;
> -		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP);
> +		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> +		status &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_ASPM_L0S;
> +		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
>  	}
>  
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR);
> -	status &= ~PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR_MPS_MASK;
> -	status |= PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR_MPS_256;
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL);
> +	status &= ~PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD;
> +	status |= PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD_256B;
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL);

Similar problem here; PCI_EXP_DEVCTL is only 16 bits, and writing the
adjacent PCI_EXP_DEVSTA may clear RW1C bits you didn't want to clear.

Bjorn


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: rockchip: Use standard PCIe defines
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:14:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250613201409.GA973486@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <992ab6278af59b8f2f82521bf4611f69a916bbe1.1749827015.git.geraldogabriel@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 12:05:31PM -0300, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> Current code uses custom-defined register offsets
> and bitfields for standard PCIe registers. Change
> to using standard PCIe defines.

Wrap to fill 75 columns so there's space for "git log" to add
indentation.

> @@ -40,18 +40,18 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_enable_bw_int(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  {
>  	u32 status;
>  
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  	status |= (PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LBMIE | PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LABIE);
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  }
>  
>  static void rockchip_pcie_clr_bw_int(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  {
>  	u32 status;
>  
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  	status |= (PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LBMS | PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LABS) << 16;

It looks funny to write PCI_EXP_LNKCTL with bits from PCI_EXP_LNKSTA.
I guess this is because rockchip_pcie_write() does 32-bit writes, but
PCI_EXP_LNKCTL and PCI_EXP_LNKSTA are adjacent 16-bit registers.

If the hardware supports it, adding rockchip_pcie_readw() and
rockchip_pcie_writew() for 16-bit accesses would make this read
better.

Hopefully the hardware *does* support this (it's required per spec at
least for config accesses, which would be a different path in the
hardware).  Doing the 32-bit write of PCI_EXP_LNKCTL above is
problematic because writes PCI_EXP_LNKSTA as well, and PCI_EXP_LNKSTA
includes some RW1C bits that may be unintentionally cleared.

> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  }
>  
>  static void rockchip_pcie_update_txcredit_mui(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_set_power_limit(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  	scale = 3; /* 0.001x */
>  	curr = curr / 1000; /* convert to mA */
>  	power = (curr * 3300) / 1000; /* milliwatt */
> -	while (power > PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CSPL_LIMIT) {
> +	while (power > FIELD_MAX(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL)) {
>  		if (!scale) {
>  			dev_warn(rockchip->dev, "invalid power supply\n");
>  			return;
> @@ -278,10 +278,10 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_set_power_limit(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  		power = power / 10;
>  	}
>  
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR);
> -	status |= (power << PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CSPL_SHIFT) |
> -		  (scale << PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CPLS_SHIFT);
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP);
> +	status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL, power);
> +	status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_SCL, scale);

This assumes the value you read from PCI_EXP_DEVCAP had zeroes in
these bits.  It might, but it would look safer to do:

  status &= ~(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL | PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_SCL);
  status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL, power);
  status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_SCL, scale);

> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP);
>  }

>  /**
> @@ -309,14 +309,14 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  	rockchip_pcie_set_power_limit(rockchip);
>  
>  	/* Set RC's clock architecture as common clock */
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  	status |= PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_SLC << 16;
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  
>  	/* Set RC's RCB to 128 */
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  	status |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RCB;
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  
>  	/* Enable Gen1 training */
>  	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_LINK_TRAIN_ENABLE,
> @@ -341,9 +341,9 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  		 * Enable retrain for gen2. This should be configured only after
>  		 * gen1 finished.
>  		 */
> -		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  		status |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL;
> -		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  
>  		err = readl_poll_timeout(rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_CORE_CTRL,
>  					 status, PCIE_LINK_IS_GEN2(status), 20,
> @@ -380,15 +380,15 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  
>  	/* Clear L0s from RC's link cap */
>  	if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "aspm-no-l0s")) {
> -		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP);
> -		status &= ~PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP_L0S;
> -		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP);
> +		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> +		status &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_ASPM_L0S;
> +		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
>  	}
>  
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR);
> -	status &= ~PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR_MPS_MASK;
> -	status |= PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR_MPS_256;
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL);
> +	status &= ~PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD;
> +	status |= PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD_256B;
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL);

Similar problem here; PCI_EXP_DEVCTL is only 16 bits, and writing the
adjacent PCI_EXP_DEVSTA may clear RW1C bits you didn't want to clear.

Bjorn

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: rockchip: Use standard PCIe defines
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:14:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250613201409.GA973486@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <992ab6278af59b8f2f82521bf4611f69a916bbe1.1749827015.git.geraldogabriel@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 12:05:31PM -0300, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> Current code uses custom-defined register offsets
> and bitfields for standard PCIe registers. Change
> to using standard PCIe defines.

Wrap to fill 75 columns so there's space for "git log" to add
indentation.

> @@ -40,18 +40,18 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_enable_bw_int(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  {
>  	u32 status;
>  
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  	status |= (PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LBMIE | PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_LABIE);
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  }
>  
>  static void rockchip_pcie_clr_bw_int(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  {
>  	u32 status;
>  
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  	status |= (PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LBMS | PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LABS) << 16;

It looks funny to write PCI_EXP_LNKCTL with bits from PCI_EXP_LNKSTA.
I guess this is because rockchip_pcie_write() does 32-bit writes, but
PCI_EXP_LNKCTL and PCI_EXP_LNKSTA are adjacent 16-bit registers.

If the hardware supports it, adding rockchip_pcie_readw() and
rockchip_pcie_writew() for 16-bit accesses would make this read
better.

Hopefully the hardware *does* support this (it's required per spec at
least for config accesses, which would be a different path in the
hardware).  Doing the 32-bit write of PCI_EXP_LNKCTL above is
problematic because writes PCI_EXP_LNKSTA as well, and PCI_EXP_LNKSTA
includes some RW1C bits that may be unintentionally cleared.

> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  }
>  
>  static void rockchip_pcie_update_txcredit_mui(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_set_power_limit(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  	scale = 3; /* 0.001x */
>  	curr = curr / 1000; /* convert to mA */
>  	power = (curr * 3300) / 1000; /* milliwatt */
> -	while (power > PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CSPL_LIMIT) {
> +	while (power > FIELD_MAX(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL)) {
>  		if (!scale) {
>  			dev_warn(rockchip->dev, "invalid power supply\n");
>  			return;
> @@ -278,10 +278,10 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_set_power_limit(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  		power = power / 10;
>  	}
>  
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR);
> -	status |= (power << PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CSPL_SHIFT) |
> -		  (scale << PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR_CPLS_SHIFT);
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCR);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP);
> +	status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL, power);
> +	status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_SCL, scale);

This assumes the value you read from PCI_EXP_DEVCAP had zeroes in
these bits.  It might, but it would look safer to do:

  status &= ~(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL | PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_SCL);
  status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_VAL, power);
  status |= FIELD_PREP(PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PWR_SCL, scale);

> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP);
>  }

>  /**
> @@ -309,14 +309,14 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  	rockchip_pcie_set_power_limit(rockchip);
>  
>  	/* Set RC's clock architecture as common clock */
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  	status |= PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_SLC << 16;
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  
>  	/* Set RC's RCB to 128 */
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  	status |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RCB;
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  
>  	/* Enable Gen1 training */
>  	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_LINK_TRAIN_ENABLE,
> @@ -341,9 +341,9 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  		 * Enable retrain for gen2. This should be configured only after
>  		 * gen1 finished.
>  		 */
> -		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  		status |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL;
> -		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LCS);
> +		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCTL);
>  
>  		err = readl_poll_timeout(rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_CORE_CTRL,
>  					 status, PCIE_LINK_IS_GEN2(status), 20,
> @@ -380,15 +380,15 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>  
>  	/* Clear L0s from RC's link cap */
>  	if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "aspm-no-l0s")) {
> -		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP);
> -		status &= ~PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP_L0S;
> -		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_LINK_CAP);
> +		status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> +		status &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_ASPM_L0S;
> +		rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
>  	}
>  
> -	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR);
> -	status &= ~PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR_MPS_MASK;
> -	status |= PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR_MPS_256;
> -	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_DCSR);
> +	status = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL);
> +	status &= ~PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD;
> +	status |= PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_PAYLOAD_256B;
> +	rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, status, PCIE_RC_CONFIG_CR + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL);

Similar problem here; PCI_EXP_DEVCTL is only 16 bits, and writing the
adjacent PCI_EXP_DEVSTA may clear RW1C bits you didn't want to clear.

Bjorn

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-13 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-13 15:05 [RESEND RFC PATCH v4 0/5] PCI: rockchip: Improve driver quality Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:05 ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:05 ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:05 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: rockchip: Use standard PCIe defines Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:05   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:05   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 20:14   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2025-06-13 20:14     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-13 20:14     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-13 20:26     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 20:26       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 20:26       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 20:50       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-13 20:50         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-13 20:50         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-13 21:01         ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 21:01           ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 21:01           ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-14  2:31           ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-14  2:31             ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-14  2:31             ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-14  1:38     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-14  1:38       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-14  1:38       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:05 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v4 2/5] PCI: rockchip: Drop unused custom registers and bitfields Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:05   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:05   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:06 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: rockchip: Set Target Link Speed before retraining Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:06   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:06   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 20:15   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-13 20:15     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-13 20:15     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-13 20:27     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 20:27       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 20:27       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:06 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v4 4/5] phy: rockchip-pcie: Enable all four lanes Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:06   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:06   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:06 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v4 5/5] phy: rockchip-pcie: Adjust read mask and write Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:06   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 15:06   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 20:20   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-13 20:20     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-13 20:20     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-13 20:32     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 20:32       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 20:32       ` Geraldo Nascimento

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250613201409.GA973486@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=geraldogabriel@gmail.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.