Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm: Rename __thp_get_unmapped_area to mm_get_unmapped_area_aligned

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>]

On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 01:20:55PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 09:14:28AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Also, probably 'aligned' is not the right name. This new function
> > should be called by VMA owners that know they have pgoff aligned high
> > order folios/pfns inside their mapping. The 'align' argument is the
> > max order of their pgoff aligned folio/pfns.
> >
> > The purpose of the function is to adjust the resulting area to
> > optimize for the high order folios that are present while following
> > the uAPI rules for mmap.
> >
> > Maybe call it something like _order and document it like the above?
> 
> Right, if it were made clear this is explicitly related to higher order
> folios that would go a long way to making the generalisation more
> acceptable.
> 
> But we definitely need to have it not filter errors if it's generic.
> 
> >
> >
> > > I also am not okay to export it for no reason.
> >
> > The next patches are the reason.
> 
> Regardless exporting it like this raises the bar for quality here.

Yes, it is also possible we have the wrong op, I know
get_unmapped_area() pre-exists, but if we are really cleaning this
stuff then something like get_max_pte_order() is probably a saner op.

It would return the size of the biggest pgoff aligned folio/pfn within
the file. Then the core code would do the special logic without
exporting this function.

Jason