From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
zide.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] Support vector and more extended registers in perf
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 19:34:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250617173420.GA1613376@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <893f1888-b8cb-4976-a0d6-606460438d73@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:23:10AM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 2025-06-17 10:29 a.m., Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 09:52:12AM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote:
> >
> >> OK. So the sample_simd_reg_words actually has another meaning now.
> >
> > Well, any simd field being non-zero means userspace knows about it. Sort
> > of an implicit flag.
>
> Yes, but the tool probably wouldn't to touch any simd fields if user
> doesn't ask for simd registers
Trivial enough to have the tool unconditionally write a simd_words size
if the attr thing is big enough. But sure, whatever :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-13 13:49 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Support vector and more extended registers in perf kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handler kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] perf/x86: Setup the regs data kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi kan.liang
2025-06-13 14:39 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 14:54 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-13 15:19 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] perf: Move has_extended_regs() to header file kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] perf/x86: Support XMM register for non-PEBS and REGS_USER kan.liang
2025-06-13 15:15 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 17:51 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-13 15:34 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 18:14 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] perf: Support extension of sample_regs kan.liang
2025-06-17 8:00 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-17 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 9:49 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-17 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 12:14 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-17 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 14:24 ` Mark Rutland
2025-06-17 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 14:55 ` Mark Rutland
2025-06-17 19:00 ` Mark Brown
2025-06-17 20:32 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-18 10:10 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 13:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-18 13:52 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 14:30 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-18 14:47 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-18 15:24 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 14:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-18 15:22 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] perf/x86: Add YMMH in extended regs kan.liang
2025-06-13 15:48 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] perf/x86: Add APX " kan.liang
2025-06-13 16:02 ` Dave Hansen
2025-06-13 17:17 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-17 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] perf/x86: Add OPMASK " kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] perf/x86: Add ZMM " kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] perf/x86: Add SSP " kan.liang
2025-06-13 13:49 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] perf/x86/intel: Support extended registers kan.liang
2025-06-17 7:50 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] Support vector and more extended registers in perf Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-17 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 13:52 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-17 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-17 15:23 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-17 17:34 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-06-18 0:57 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-18 10:47 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-18 12:28 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-18 13:15 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-19 0:41 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-19 11:11 ` Liang, Kan
2025-06-19 12:26 ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-19 13:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-06-19 14:27 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250617173420.GA1613376@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.