From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: oleg@redhat.com,bsevens@google.com,torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 16:47:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025061744-precinct-rubble-45c9@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.4.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x f90fff1e152dedf52b932240ebbd670d83330eca
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025061744-precinct-rubble-45c9@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.4.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From f90fff1e152dedf52b932240ebbd670d83330eca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 19:26:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()
and posix_cpu_timer_del()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
or debugger right after unlock_task_sighand().
If a concurrent posix_cpu_timer_del() runs at that moment, it won't be
able to detect timer->it.cpu.firing != 0: cpu_timer_task_rcu() and/or
lock_task_sighand() will fail.
Add the tsk->exit_state check into run_posix_cpu_timers() to fix this.
This fix is not needed if CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK=y, because
exit_task_work() is called before exit_notify(). But the check still
makes sense, task_work_add(&tsk->posix_cputimers_work.work) will fail
anyway in this case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Benoît Sevens <bsevens@google.com>
Fixes: 0bdd2ed4138e ("sched: run_posix_cpu_timers: Don't check ->exit_state, use lock_task_sighand()")
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 50e8d04ab661..2e5b89d7d866 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -1405,6 +1405,15 @@ void run_posix_cpu_timers(void)
lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+ /*
+ * Ensure that release_task(tsk) can't happen while
+ * handle_posix_cpu_timers() is running. Otherwise, a concurrent
+ * posix_cpu_timer_del() may fail to lock_task_sighand(tsk) and
+ * miss timer->it.cpu.firing != 0.
+ */
+ if (tsk->exit_state)
+ return;
+
/*
* If the actual expiry is deferred to task work context and the
* work is already scheduled there is no point to do anything here.
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-17 14:47 gregkh [this message]
2025-06-17 17:26 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree Oleg Nesterov
2025-06-19 9:02 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025061744-precinct-rubble-45c9@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bsevens@google.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.