From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 05:02:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250618112251-e884ef1d31b4675d@stable.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250617172613.GA19542@redhat.com>
[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: f90fff1e152dedf52b932240ebbd670d83330eca
Status in newer kernel trees:
6.15.y | Present (different SHA1: d65f6c68f7b1)
6.12.y | Present (different SHA1: 18a3e65f32ed)
6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: 8db5813e9ad7)
6.1.y | Present (different SHA1: 61fa08967f27)
5.15.y | Present (different SHA1: f6e90a3258e0)
5.10.y | Present (different SHA1: 1c179c7c3b82)
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1: f90fff1e152de ! 1: 933e5cbcf266c posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()
@@ Metadata
Author: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
## Commit message ##
- posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()
+ FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
+
+ On 06/17, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
+ >
+ > The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
+
+ Please see the attached patch for 5.4.y
+
+ Oleg.
+
+ From a3dbb5447bc9a8f9c04ffa5381b0a0bd77b1bdd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+ From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
+ Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 19:15:50 +0200
+ Subject: [PATCH 5.4.y] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between
+ handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()
+ MIME-Version: 1.0
+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+ commit f90fff1e152dedf52b932240ebbd670d83330eca upstream.
If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
@@ kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c: void run_posix_cpu_timers(void)
+ return;
+
/*
- * If the actual expiry is deferred to task work context and the
- * work is already scheduled there is no point to do anything here.
+ * The fast path checks that there are no expired thread or thread
+ * group timers. If that's so, just return.
---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-5.4.y | Success | Success |
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-19 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-17 14:47 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree gregkh
2025-06-17 17:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-06-19 9:02 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250618112251-e884ef1d31b4675d@stable.kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.